• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Voluntary Self-Exclusion and Contingency Management for the Treatment of Problematic and Harmful Gambling in the UK: An Exploratory Study.英国针对问题性和有害赌博治疗的自愿自我排除与应急管理:一项探索性研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Oct 4;11(19):2682. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11192682.
2
Effectiveness of a voluntary casino self-exclusion online self-management program.一项自愿性赌场自我排除在线自我管理计划的有效性。
Internet Interv. 2020 Dec 1;23:100354. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2020.100354. eCollection 2021 Mar.
3
The Efficacy of Voluntary Self-Exclusions in Reducing Gambling Among a Real-World Sample of British Online Casino Players.自愿性自我排除在减少英国在线赌场玩家实际样本中的赌博行为的效果。
J Gambl Stud. 2023 Dec;39(4):1833-1848. doi: 10.1007/s10899-023-10198-y. Epub 2023 Mar 25.
4
Gambling treatment service providers' views about contingency management: a thematic analysis.赌博治疗服务提供者对Contingency Management 的看法:主题分析。
Harm Reduct J. 2022 Feb 25;19(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12954-022-00600-0.
5
Understanding Online Voluntary Self-Exclusion in Gambling: An Empirical Study Using Account-Based Behavioral Tracking Data.理解赌博中的在线自愿自我排除:基于账户的行为跟踪数据的实证研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 19;18(4):2000. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18042000.
6
Differential Effects of Formal and Informal Gambling on Symptoms of Problem Gambling During Voluntary Self-Exclusion.自愿性自我排除期间,正式和非正式赌博对问题赌博症状的影响差异。
J Gambl Stud. 2018 Sep;34(3):1013-1031. doi: 10.1007/s10899-018-9743-5.
7
Client Views of Contingency Management in Gambling Treatment: A Thematic Analysis.患者对赌博治疗中权变管理的看法:主题分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 19;19(24):17101. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192417101.
8
Efficacy of a Voluntary Self-exclusion Reinstatement Tutorial for Problem Gamblers.自愿性自我排除复归教程对问题赌徒的效果。
J Gambl Stud. 2021 Dec;37(4):1245-1262. doi: 10.1007/s10899-021-09998-x. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
9
Multi-operator Self-exclusion as a Harm Reduction Measure in Problem Gambling: Retrospective Clinical Study on Gambling Relapse Despite Self-exclusion.多运营商自我排除作为问题赌博中的一种减少伤害措施:关于尽管进行了自我排除仍出现赌博复发的回顾性临床研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2022 Aug 19;9(8):e37837. doi: 10.2196/37837.
10
Pareto distributions in online casino gambling: Sensitivity to timeframe and associations with self exclusion.在线博彩中的帕累托分布:对时间框架的敏感性及与自我排除的关联。
Addict Behav. 2021 Sep;120:106968. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106968. Epub 2021 Apr 29.

本文引用的文献

1
The Efficacy of Voluntary Self-Exclusions in Reducing Gambling Among a Real-World Sample of British Online Casino Players.自愿性自我排除在减少英国在线赌场玩家实际样本中的赌博行为的效果。
J Gambl Stud. 2023 Dec;39(4):1833-1848. doi: 10.1007/s10899-023-10198-y. Epub 2023 Mar 25.
2
Client Views of Contingency Management in Gambling Treatment: A Thematic Analysis.患者对赌博治疗中权变管理的看法:主题分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 19;19(24):17101. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192417101.
3
Self-exclusion from gambling: A toothless tiger?自我禁赌:一只没有牙齿的老虎?
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Sep 23;13:992309. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.992309. eCollection 2022.
4
Predicting self-exclusion among online gamblers: An empirical real-world study.预测网络赌徒的自我排除行为:一项实证的真实世界研究。
J Gambl Stud. 2023 Mar;39(1):447-465. doi: 10.1007/s10899-022-10149-z. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
5
Gambling treatment service providers' views about contingency management: a thematic analysis.赌博治疗服务提供者对Contingency Management 的看法:主题分析。
Harm Reduct J. 2022 Feb 25;19(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12954-022-00600-0.
6
Analyzing Consumer Protection for Gamblers Across Different Online Gambling Operators: A Replication Study.分析不同在线赌博运营商对赌徒的消费者保护:一项复制研究。
Int J Ment Health Addict. 2021 Nov 9:1-16. doi: 10.1007/s11469-021-00695-9.
7
Pareto distributions in online casino gambling: Sensitivity to timeframe and associations with self exclusion.在线博彩中的帕累托分布:对时间框架的敏感性及与自我排除的关联。
Addict Behav. 2021 Sep;120:106968. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106968. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
8
Understanding Online Voluntary Self-Exclusion in Gambling: An Empirical Study Using Account-Based Behavioral Tracking Data.理解赌博中的在线自愿自我排除:基于账户的行为跟踪数据的实证研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 19;18(4):2000. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18042000.
9
Gambling Despite Nationwide Self-Exclusion-A Survey in Online Gamblers in Sweden.尽管有全国性自我禁赌措施仍参与赌博——瑞典在线赌博者调查
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Dec 2;11:599967. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.599967. eCollection 2020.
10
Gambling Harm as a Global Public Health Concern: A Mixed Method Investigation of Trends in Wales.赌博危害作为全球公共卫生关注点:威尔士趋势的混合方法研究。
Front Public Health. 2020 Jul 22;8:320. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00320. eCollection 2020.

英国针对问题性和有害赌博治疗的自愿自我排除与应急管理:一项探索性研究。

Voluntary Self-Exclusion and Contingency Management for the Treatment of Problematic and Harmful Gambling in the UK: An Exploratory Study.

作者信息

Zolkwer Morgan B, Dymond Simon, Singer Bryan F

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RH, UK.

Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London WC1N 1EH, UK.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Oct 4;11(19):2682. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11192682.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare11192682
PMID:37830719
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10573067/
Abstract

Research into self-directed methods for reducing problematic and harmful gambling is still in its infancy. One strategy that individuals use to prevent gambling involves voluntary self-exclusion (VSE) programs. For example, VSE programs can make it challenging to access betting sites or enable banks to block gambling-related transactions. Although individual VSEs can be helpful when used alone, it is unclear whether their efficacy is enhanced when combined. Furthermore, it is unknown how VSE compliance can be improved. We propose that contingency management (CM), an evidence-based strategy to incentivise abstinence, could encourage continued VSE use, promoting long-lasting recovery from problematic or harmful gambling. Here, we conducted exploratory analyses on VSE use and CM for gambling in two populations (members of the UK general population recruited and students). Participants responded favourably regarding combined VSE use. They felt that providing vouchers exchangeable for goods/services could incentivise gambling abstinence during VSE. However, some were concerned about people potentially "gaming" the system. Participants believed supplementing VSE and CM with social support could encourage abstinence. These attitudes, and recent research on treatment providers' opinions on CM for gambling, suggest that experimental evidence should be sought to determine the efficacy of combined VSE use and CM for gambling.

摘要

针对减少问题性和有害赌博的自我导向方法的研究仍处于起步阶段。个人用于预防赌博的一种策略涉及自愿自我排除(VSE)计划。例如,VSE计划可以使访问博彩网站变得具有挑战性,或者使银行能够阻止与赌博相关的交易。虽然单独使用个人VSE可能会有所帮助,但尚不清楚将它们结合使用时其效果是否会增强。此外,尚不清楚如何提高VSE的依从性。我们提出,应急管理(CM)作为一种基于证据的激励戒赌的策略,可以鼓励持续使用VSE,促进从问题性或有害赌博中实现长期康复。在此,我们对两个人群(招募的英国普通人群成员和学生)中VSE的使用和用于赌博的CM进行了探索性分析。参与者对联合使用VSE反应良好。他们认为提供可兑换商品/服务的代金券可以在VSE期间激励戒赌。然而,一些人担心人们可能会“钻系统的空子”。参与者认为用社会支持补充VSE和CM可以鼓励戒赌。这些态度,以及最近关于治疗提供者对用于赌博的CM的看法的研究,表明应该寻求实验证据来确定联合使用VSE和CM对赌博的疗效。