Cognitive Science HUB, University of Vienna, Austria; European Centre for Environment & Human Health, University of Exeter, UK.
Institute for Housing and Urban Research, Uppsala University, Sweden; Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Sweden.
Environ Int. 2023 Nov;181:108234. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2023.108234. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
Nature-based solutions including urban forests and wetlands can help communities cope better with climate change and other environmental stressors by enhancing social-ecological resilience. Natural ecosystems, settings, elements and affordances can also help individuals become more personally resilient to a variety of stressors, although the mechanisms underpinning individual-level nature-based resilience, and their relations to social-ecological resilience, are not well articulated. We propose 'nature-based biopsychosocial resilience theory' (NBRT) to address these gaps. Our framework begins by suggesting that individual-level resilience can refer to both: a) a person's set of adaptive resources; and b) the processes by which these resources are deployed. Drawing on existing nature-health perspectives, we argue that nature contact can support individuals build and maintain biological, psychological, and social (i.e. biopsychosocial) resilience-related resources. Together with nature-based social-ecological resilience, these biopsychosocial resilience resources can: i) reduce the risk of various stressors (preventive resilience); ii) enhance adaptive reactions to stressful circumstances (response resilience), and/or iii) facilitate more rapid and/or complete recovery from stress (recovery resilience). Reference to these three resilience processes supports integration across more familiar pathways involving harm reduction, capacity building, and restoration. Evidence in support of the theory, potential interventions to promote nature-based biopsychosocial resilience, and issues that require further consideration are discussed.
基于自然的解决方案,包括城市森林和湿地,可以通过增强社会生态弹性,帮助社区更好地应对气候变化和其他环境压力。自然生态系统、环境、元素和可提供性也可以帮助个人对各种压力源更具个体弹性,尽管支撑个体层面基于自然的弹性的机制及其与社会生态弹性的关系尚未得到很好的阐述。我们提出“基于自然的生物心理社会弹性理论”(NBRT)来解决这些差距。我们的框架首先表明,个体层面的弹性可以指:a)一个人的一套适应资源;b)这些资源被部署的过程。借鉴现有的自然健康观点,我们认为与自然接触可以支持个人建立和维持与生物、心理和社会(即生物心理社会)弹性相关的资源。与基于自然的社会生态弹性一起,这些生物心理社会弹性资源可以:i)降低各种压力源的风险(预防弹性);ii)增强对压力环境的适应性反应(反应弹性),和/或 iii)促进从压力中更快和/或更完全地恢复(恢复弹性)。对这三个弹性过程的提及支持了更熟悉的涉及减少伤害、能力建设和恢复的途径的整合。讨论了支持该理论的证据、促进基于自然的生物心理社会弹性的潜在干预措施以及需要进一步考虑的问题。