Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Memory and Alzheimer's Disease Institute, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
Brain Institute, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2023 Oct 13;15(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s13195-023-01314-6.
BACKGROUND: Development of in vivo biomarkers has shifted the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) from the later dementia stages of disease towards the earlier stages and has introduced the potential for pre-symptomatic diagnosis. The International Working Group recommends that AD diagnosis is restricted in the clinical setting to people with specific AD phenotypes and supportive biomarker findings. MAIN BODY: In this review, we discuss the phenotypic presentation and use of biomarkers for the early diagnosis of typical and atypical AD and describe how this can support clinical decision making, benefit patient communication, and improve the patient journey. Early diagnosis is essential to optimize the benefits of available and emerging treatments. As atypical presentations of AD often mimic other dementias, differential diagnosis can be challenging and can be facilitated using AD biomarkers. However, AD biomarkers alone are not sufficient to confidently diagnose AD or predict disease progression and should be supplementary to clinical assessment to help inform the diagnosis of AD. CONCLUSIONS: Use of AD biomarkers with incorporation of atypical AD phenotypes into diagnostic criteria will allow earlier diagnosis of patients with atypical clinical presentations that otherwise would have been misdiagnosed and treated inappropriately. Early diagnosis is essential to guide informed discussion, appropriate care and support, and individualized treatment. It is hoped that disease-modifying treatments will impact the underlying AD pathology; thus, determining the patient's AD phenotype will be a critical factor in guiding the therapeutic approach and the assessment of the effects of interventions.
背景:体内生物标志物的发展将阿尔茨海默病(AD)的诊断从疾病的后期痴呆阶段转移到早期阶段,并引入了进行症状前诊断的可能性。国际工作组建议,在临床环境中,AD 的诊断仅限于具有特定 AD 表型和支持性生物标志物发现的患者。
主要内容:在这篇综述中,我们讨论了用于典型和非典型 AD 的早期诊断的表型表现和生物标志物的使用,并描述了这如何支持临床决策、有利于患者沟通和改善患者就医体验。早期诊断对于优化现有和新兴治疗方法的益处至关重要。由于 AD 的非典型表现通常类似于其他痴呆症,因此鉴别诊断具有挑战性,可以使用 AD 生物标志物来辅助诊断。然而,AD 生物标志物本身不足以明确诊断 AD 或预测疾病进展,应作为临床评估的补充,以帮助 AD 的诊断。
结论:使用 AD 生物标志物并将非典型 AD 表型纳入诊断标准,将允许对具有非典型临床表现的患者进行更早的诊断,否则这些患者可能会被误诊和不恰当地治疗。早期诊断对于指导知情讨论、提供适当的护理和支持以及进行个体化治疗至关重要。人们希望疾病修饰治疗会影响潜在的 AD 病理;因此,确定患者的 AD 表型将成为指导治疗方法和评估干预效果的关键因素。
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2023-10-13
CNS Spectr. 2017-2-15
J Intern Med. 2014-3
Rev Neurol (Paris). 2013-9-6
J Alzheimers Dis. 2018
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025-7-26
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2025-8-22
Int J Mol Sci. 2025-8-1
Nat Commun. 2025-8-11
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2025-7-30
Int J Mol Sci. 2025-7-10
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2023-3-20
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2022-6-13
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2022-5-4
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2022-4-27