Zaborowska Magdalena, Wyszkowska Jadwiga, Borowik Agata, Kucharski Jan
Department of Soil Science and Microbiology, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Plac Łódzki 3, 10-727 Olsztyn, Poland.
Materials (Basel). 2023 Sep 29;16(19):6500. doi: 10.3390/ma16196500.
Negative public sentiment built up around bisphenol A (BPA) follows growing awareness of the frequency of this chemical compound in the environment. The increase in air, water, and soil contamination by BPA has also generated the need to replace it with less toxic analogs, such as Bisphenol F (BPF) and Bisphenol S (BPS). However, due to the structural similarity of BPF and BPS to BPA, questions arise about the safety of their usage. The toxicity of BPA, BPF, and BPS towards humans and animals has been fairly well understood. The biodegradability potential of microorganisms towards each of these bisphenols is also widely recognized. However, the scale of their inhibitory pressure on soil microbiomes and soil enzyme activity has not been estimated. These parameters are extremely important in determining soil health, which in turn also influences plant growth and development. Therefore, in this manuscript, knowledge has been expanded and systematized regarding the differences in toxicity between BPA and its two analogs. In the context of the synthetic characterization of the effects of bisphenol permeation into the environment, the toxic impact of BPA, BPF, and BPS on the microbiological and biochemical parameters of soils was traced. The response of cultivated plants to their influence was also analyzed.
随着人们对环境中双酚A（BPA）这种化合物出现频率的认识不断提高，围绕它的负面公众情绪逐渐积累。双酚A对空气、水和土壤的污染日益增加，这也催生了用毒性较小的类似物（如双酚F（BPF）和双酚S（BPS））来替代它的需求。然而，由于BPF和BPS在结构上与BPA相似，它们使用的安全性引发了疑问。双酚A、BPF和BPS对人和动物的毒性已得到相当充分的了解。微生物对这些双酚各自的生物降解潜力也得到广泛认可。然而，它们对土壤微生物群落和土壤酶活性的抑制压力程度尚未得到评估。这些参数在确定土壤健康方面极为重要，而土壤健康反过来又会影响植物的生长和发育。因此，在本论文中，关于双酚A与其两种类似物之间毒性差异的知识得到了扩展和系统化。在双酚渗透到环境中的影响的综合表征背景下，追踪了双酚A、BPF和BPS对土壤微生物和生化参数的毒性影响。还分析了栽培植物对它们影响的反应。
