Gorrino Irene, Canessa Nicola, Mattavelli Giulia
IUSS Cognitive Neuroscience (ICoN) Center, Scuola Universitaria Superiore IUSS, Pavia, Italy.
Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory of Pavia Institute, Pavia, Italy.
Front Behav Neurosci. 2023 Sep 28;17:1234837. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1234837. eCollection 2023.
Previous neuroimaging evidence highlighted the role of the insular and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) in conflict monitoring and decision-making, thus supporting the translational implications of targeting these regions in neuro-stimulation treatments for clinical purposes. Recent advancements of targeting and modeling procedures for high-definition tDCS (HD-tDCS) provided methodological support for the stimulation of otherwise challenging targets, and a previous study confirmed that cathodal HD-tDCS of the dACC modulates executive control and decision-making metrics in healthy individuals. On the other hand, evidence on the effect of stimulating the insula is still needed.
We used a modeling/targeting procedure to investigate the effect of stimulating the posterior insula on Flanker and gambling tasks assessing, respectively, executive control and both loss and risk aversion in decision-making. HD-tDCS was applied through 6 small electrodes delivering anodal, cathodal or sham stimulation for 20 min in a within-subject offline design with three separate sessions.
Bayesian statistical analyses on Flanker conflict effect, as well as loss and risk aversion, provided moderate evidence for the null model (i.e., absence of HD-tDCS modulation).
These findings suggest that further research on the effect of HD-tDCS on different regions is required to define reliable targets for clinical applications. While modeling and targeting procedures for neuromodulation in clinical research could lead to innovative protocols for stand-alone treatment, or possibly in combination with cognitive training, assessing the effectiveness of insula stimulation might require sensitive metrics other than those investigated here.
先前的神经影像学证据强调了脑岛和背侧前扣带回皮质(dACC)在冲突监测和决策中的作用,从而支持了在神经刺激治疗中针对这些区域以达到临床目的的转化意义。高清晰度经颅直流电刺激(HD-tDCS)靶向和建模程序的最新进展为刺激原本具有挑战性的靶点提供了方法学支持,并且先前的一项研究证实,dACC的阴极HD-tDCS可调节健康个体的执行控制和决策指标。另一方面,仍需要有关刺激脑岛效果的证据。
我们使用了一种建模/靶向程序来研究刺激脑岛后部对分别评估执行控制以及决策中的损失和风险规避的侧翼任务和赌博任务的影响。HD-tDCS通过6个小电极施加,在受试者内离线设计中进行阳极、阴极或假刺激20分钟,共三个独立的疗程。
对侧翼冲突效应以及损失和风险规避的贝叶斯统计分析为零模型(即不存在HD-tDCS调制)提供了适度的证据。
这些发现表明,需要对HD-tDCS对不同区域的影响进行进一步研究,以确定临床应用的可靠靶点。虽然临床研究中神经调节的建模和靶向程序可能会产生用于单独治疗或可能与认知训练相结合的创新方案,但评估脑岛刺激的有效性可能需要除本文研究之外的敏感指标。