• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

促进青少年交通安全:驾驶随机对照试验。

Promoting transportation safety in adolescence: the drivingly randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Centre for Applied Developmental Psychology, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Penn Injury Science Center, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, USA.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2023 Oct 17;23(1):2020. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16801-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-023-16801-6
PMID:37848929
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10580546/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The impact of young drivers' motor vehicle crashes (MVC) is substantial, with young drivers constituting only 14% of the US population, but contributing to 30% of all fatal and nonfatal injuries due to MVCs and 35% ($25 billion) of the all medical and lost productivity costs. The current best-practice policy approach, Graduated Driver Licensing (GDL) programs, are effective primarily by delaying licensure and restricting crash opportunity. There is a critical need for interventions that target families to complement GDL. Consequently, we will determine if a comprehensive parent-teen intervention, the Drivingly Program, reduces teens' risk for a police-reported MVC in the first 12 months of licensure. Drivingly is based on strong preliminary data and targets multiple risk and protective factors by delivering intervention content to teens, and their parents, at the learner and early independent licensing phases.

METHODS

Eligible participants are aged 16-17.33 years of age, have a learner's permit in Pennsylvania, have practiced no more than 10 h, and have at least one parent/caregiver supervising. Participants are recruited from the general community and through the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia's Recruitment Enhancement Core. Teen-parent dyads are randomized 1:1 to Drivingly or usual practice control group. Drivingly participants receive access to an online curriculum which has 16 lessons for parents and 13 for teens and an online logbook; website usage is tracked. Parents receive two, brief, psychoeducational sessions with a trained health coach and teens receive an on-road driving intervention and feedback session after 4.5 months in the study and access to DriverZed, the AAA Foundation's online hazard training program. Teens complete surveys at baseline, 3 months post-baseline, at licensure, 3months post-licensure, 6 months post-licensure, and 12 months post-licensure. Parents complete surveys at baseline, 3 months post-baseline, and at teen licensure. The primary end-point is police-reported MVCs within the first 12 months of licensure; crash data are provided by the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation.

DISCUSSION

Most evaluations of teen driver safety programs have significant methodological limitations including lack of random assignment, insufficient statistical power, and reliance on self-reported MVCs instead of police reports. Results will identify pragmatic and sustainable solutions for MVC prevention in adolescence.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov # NCT03639753.

摘要

背景

年轻驾驶员发生机动车碰撞(MVC)的影响巨大,尽管年轻驾驶员仅占美国总人口的 14%,但他们却导致了 30%的 MVC 导致的所有致命和非致命伤害,以及 35%(250 亿美元)的所有医疗和生产力损失。目前最好的实践政策方法是分级驾驶执照(GDL)计划,其主要通过延迟许可和限制碰撞机会来发挥作用。因此,我们将确定一项全面的家长-青少年干预措施,即 Drivingly 计划,是否可以降低青少年在获得执照后的 12 个月内发生警方报告的 MVC 的风险。Drivingly 计划基于强有力的初步数据,通过向青少年及其父母在学习阶段和早期独立驾驶阶段提供干预内容,针对多个风险和保护因素进行干预。

方法

合格的参与者年龄在 16-17.33 岁之间,在宾夕法尼亚州拥有学习许可证,实际练习时间不超过 10 小时,至少有一位父母/照顾者监督。参与者从普通社区和费城儿童医院的增强招募核心招募。青少年-父母对子随机分为 Drivingly 组或常规实践对照组,每组 1:1。Drivingly 组参与者可以访问在线课程,其中包括 16 节针对父母的课程和 13 节针对青少年的课程以及在线日志;网站使用情况被跟踪。父母接受两次简短的心理教育课程,由训练有素的健康教练进行指导,青少年在研究进行 4.5 个月后接受一次路考驾驶干预和反馈,并可以访问 AAA 基金会的在线危险培训计划 DriverZed。青少年在基线、基线后 3 个月、获得执照时、获得执照后 3 个月、获得执照后 6 个月和获得执照后 12 个月进行调查。父母在基线、基线后 3 个月和青少年获得执照时进行调查。主要终点是在获得执照后的 12 个月内警方报告的 MVC;碰撞数据由宾夕法尼亚州交通部提供。

讨论

大多数青少年驾驶员安全计划的评估都存在重大方法学限制,包括缺乏随机分组、统计能力不足以及依赖自我报告的 MVC 而不是警方报告。研究结果将确定青少年期 MVC 预防的实用和可持续解决方案。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov # NCT03639753。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a25f/10580546/ef347997d28c/12889_2023_16801_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a25f/10580546/ef347997d28c/12889_2023_16801_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a25f/10580546/ef347997d28c/12889_2023_16801_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Promoting transportation safety in adolescence: the drivingly randomized controlled trial.促进青少年交通安全:驾驶随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Oct 17;23(1):2020. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16801-6.
2
Characteristics of Single Vehicle Crashes with a Teen Driver in South Carolina, 2005-2008.2005-2008 年南卡罗来纳州青少年驾驶员单车事故特征分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Jan;122:325-331. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.08.002. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
3
Spatial variation in teens' crash rate reduction following the implementation of a graduated driver licensing program in Michigan.密歇根州实施分级驾照制度后青少年事故率降低的空间变化。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Apr;125:20-28. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.01.023. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
4
Driving errors of learner teens: frequency, nature and their association with practice.青少年学习者的驾驶错误:频率、性质及其与练习的关联。
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Nov;72:433-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.07.033. Epub 2014 Sep 1.
5
Attitudes of teenagers and their parents to Pennsylvania's graduated driver licensing system.青少年及其父母对宾夕法尼亚州分级驾照许可制度的态度。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2008;9(3):217-23. doi: 10.1080/15389580802005660.
6
TeenDrivingPlan effectiveness: the effect of quantity and diversity of supervised practice on teens' driving performance.青少年驾驶计划的有效性:监督练习的数量和多样性对青少年驾驶表现的影响。
J Adolesc Health. 2014 Nov;55(5):620-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.04.010. Epub 2014 Jun 9.
7
An evaluation of the effect of Ohio's graduated driver licensing law on motor vehicle crashes and crash outcomes involving drivers 16 to 20 years of age.对俄亥俄州分级驾驶员执照法对涉及16至20岁驾驶员的机动车碰撞事故及碰撞后果的影响进行评估。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2017 May 19;18(4):344-350. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2016.1209493. Epub 2016 Sep 2.
8
The effect of the learner license Graduated Driver Licensing components on teen drivers' crashes.学习驾照的驾龄限制成分对青少年司机事故的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Oct;59:327-36. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.06.001. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
9
Young driver crash rates by licensing age, driving experience, and license phase.年轻驾驶员的事故率与驾照年龄、驾龄和驾照阶段有关。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Jul;80:243-50. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.04.019. Epub 2015 May 20.
10
Parental influence on adolescent compliance with graduated driver licensing conditions and crashes as a restricted licensed driver: New Zealand drivers study.父母对青少年遵守驾考分级制条件和作为受限驾照驾驶员发生事故的影响:新西兰驾驶员研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Aug;69:30-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.06.034. Epub 2013 Jul 12.

引用本文的文献

1
The effectiveness of behavioural interventions on young, novice drivers' motor vehicle crash risk: A systematic review.行为干预对年轻新手驾驶员机动车碰撞风险的有效性:一项系统综述。
J Transp Health. 2025 Aug;43. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2025.102045. Epub 2025 May 7.
2
Predicting Young Drivers' Time-to-Licensure from Sociodemographic Characteristics and Quality of Adult-Supervised Practice.根据社会人口学特征和成人监督下的练习质量预测年轻驾驶员获得驾照的时间。
Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2025 Oct;114:1268-1277. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2025.07.032. Epub 2025 Jul 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Learning to drive: A reconceptualization.学习驾驶:一种重新概念化
Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2019 Apr;62:316-326. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2019.01.010. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
2
Talking with teens about traffic safety: Initial feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of a parent-targeted intervention for primary care settings.与青少年谈论交通安全:在初级保健环境中针对父母的干预措施的初步可行性、可接受性和效果。
J Safety Res. 2018 Sep;66:113-120. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2018.06.008. Epub 2018 Jun 23.
3
Can Adolescent Drivers' Motor Vehicle Crash Risk Be Reduced by Pre-Licensure Intervention?
青少年驾驶员的机动车事故风险能否通过驾前干预降低?
J Adolesc Health. 2018 Mar;62(3):341-348. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.09.015. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
4
History and current status of state graduated driver licensing (GDL) laws in the United States.美国分级驾照(GDL)法规的历史与现状
J Safety Res. 2016 Feb;56:9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2015.11.006. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
5
Effectiveness of Parent-Focused Interventions to Increase Teen Driver Safety: A Critical Review.以父母为中心的干预措施对提高青少年驾驶员安全性的有效性:一项批判性综述。
J Adolesc Health. 2015 Jul;57(1 Suppl):S6-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.01.003.
6
A Review of Hazard Anticipation Training Programs for Young Drivers.年轻驾驶员危险预判培训项目综述
J Adolesc Health. 2015 Jul;57(1 Suppl):S15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.02.013.
7
Driving errors of learner teens: frequency, nature and their association with practice.青少年学习者的驾驶错误:频率、性质及其与练习的关联。
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Nov;72:433-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.07.033. Epub 2014 Sep 1.
8
Crash and traffic violation rates before and after licensure for novice California drivers subject to different driver licensing requirements.新手加州驾驶员在遵守不同驾照要求前后的撞车和违章率。
J Safety Res. 2014 Sep;50:125-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2014.05.005. Epub 2014 Jun 14.
9
Effect of the teen driving plan on the driving performance of teenagers before licensure: a randomized clinical trial.青少年驾驶计划对青少年领证前驾驶表现的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Pediatr. 2014 Aug;168(8):764-71. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.252.
10
Increasing safe teenaged driving: time to integrate the growing evidence base.提高青少年安全驾驶水平:是时候整合不断增长的证据基础了。
JAMA Pediatr. 2014 Aug;168(8):703-4. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.582.