• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

妇科癌症化疗患者报告结局和医生报告结局的前瞻性分析。

Prospective analysis of patient-reported outcomes and physician-reported outcomes with gynecologic cancer chemotherapy.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.

Pathophysiology and Bioregulation, St. Marianna University Graduate School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.

出版信息

J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2024 Jan;50(1):75-85. doi: 10.1111/jog.15811. Epub 2023 Oct 18.

DOI:10.1111/jog.15811
PMID:37852304
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Gynecologic cancer chemotherapy impacts the quality of life (QOL) of patients, with lasting adverse events that may require treatment adjustments or discontinuation. Consequently, real-time symptom monitoring before outpatient visits has resulted in improved QOL for patients and extended survival times. This study investigated whether there are differences between electronic patient-reported outcomes (e-PRO-CTCAE) and physician-assessed outcomes (NCI-CTCAE) evaluated in an outpatient setting in gynecologic cancer chemotherapy.

METHODS

The study was conducted on 50 patients who received their first chemotherapy treatment at St. Marianna University Hospital Obstetrics and Gynecology from July 1, 2021 to December 31, 2022. PRO-CTCAE and NCI-CTCAE were evaluated at each instance of chemotherapy and 2 weeks after. The PRO-CTCAE was additionally collected weekly using e-PRO.

RESULTS

The values for "Joint Pain," "Nausea," "Taste Disturbance," "Constipation," "Insomnia," "Fatigue," "Limb Edema," and "Concentration Impairment" were consistently higher in PRO-CTCAE than in NCI-CTCAE, indicating that physicians underestimated the severity of adverse events. In contrast, there was no significant difference in "Peripheral Neuropathy," demonstrating that physicians had a good understanding of this condition in patients. The weekly responses obtained from e-PRO revealed that symptom exacerbations peaked outside of clinic visits.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated physicians tend to underestimate most adverse events. Moreover, the responses using e-PRO revealed peak symptom deterioration occurred outside of outpatient visits. This suggested that e-PRO and actions taken in response to them can improve patients' QOL.

摘要

目的

妇科癌症化疗会影响患者的生活质量(QOL),且会产生持久的不良反应,这可能需要调整或停止治疗。因此,在门诊就诊前进行实时症状监测,可改善患者的 QOL 并延长生存时间。本研究旨在探讨妇科癌症化疗门诊环境中电子患者报告结局(e-PRO-CTCAE)和医生评估结局(NCI-CTCAE)是否存在差异。

方法

该研究纳入了 2021 年 7 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日在圣玛丽安娜大学医院妇产科接受首次化疗的 50 例患者。在每次化疗时和化疗后 2 周评估 PRO-CTCAE 和 NCI-CTCAE。此外,每周还通过 e-PRO 额外收集 PRO-CTCAE。

结果

与 NCI-CTCAE 相比,PRO-CTCAE 中的“关节痛”、“恶心”、“味觉障碍”、“便秘”、“失眠”、“乏力”、“肢体水肿”和“注意力障碍”的评分更高,表明医生低估了不良反应的严重程度。相比之下,“周围神经病变”的评分无显著差异,表明医生对患者的这种情况有较好的了解。e-PRO 每周的应答显示,症状恶化在就诊之外的时间达到峰值。

结论

本研究表明,医生往往会低估大多数不良反应。此外,e-PRO 的应答结果显示,就诊之外的时间症状恶化达到峰值。这表明 e-PRO 及其应对措施可改善患者的 QOL。

相似文献

1
Prospective analysis of patient-reported outcomes and physician-reported outcomes with gynecologic cancer chemotherapy.妇科癌症化疗患者报告结局和医生报告结局的前瞻性分析。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2024 Jan;50(1):75-85. doi: 10.1111/jog.15811. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
2
Comparison of Patient- and Practitioner-Reported Toxic Effects Associated With Chemoradiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer.头颈部癌放化疗相关的患者报告与从业者报告的毒性效应比较。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Jun 1;142(6):517-23. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2016.0656.
3
Surveillance of Symptom Burden Using the Patient-Reported Outcome Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events in Patients With Various Types of Cancers During Chemoradiation Therapy: Real-World Study.在放化疗期间,使用患者报告的不良事件通用术语标准的患者报告结局版本对各种癌症患者的症状负担进行监测:真实世界研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Mar 8;9:e44105. doi: 10.2196/44105.
4
Feasibility of Patient Reporting of Symptomatic Adverse Events via the Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) in a Chemoradiotherapy Cooperative Group Multicenter Clinical Trial.在一项放化疗协作组多中心临床试验中,通过患者报告的不良事件通用术语标准(PRO-CTCAE)让患者报告症状性不良事件的可行性。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Jun 1;98(2):409-418. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.02.002. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
5
Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy-patient-reported outcomes compared with NCI-CTCAE grade.化疗诱导性周围神经病-患者报告结局与 NCI-CTCAE 分级比较。
Support Care Cancer. 2019 Dec;27(12):4771-4777. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04781-6. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
6
Acceptability of Routine Evaluations Using Patient-Reported Outcomes of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events and Other Patient-Reported Symptom Outcome Tools in Cancer Outpatients: Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Experience.在癌症门诊患者中使用通用不良事件术语标准和其他患者报告症状结局工具进行常规评估的可接受性:玛格丽特公主癌症中心的经验。
Oncologist. 2019 Nov;24(11):e1219-e1227. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0830. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
7
Evaluation of different recall periods for the US National Cancer Institute's PRO-CTCAE.对美国国立癌症研究所的PRO-CTCAE不同召回期的评估。
Clin Trials. 2017 Jun;14(3):255-263. doi: 10.1177/1740774517698645. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
8
Developing tumor-specific PRO-CTCAE item sets: analysis of a cross-sectional survey in three German outpatient cancer centers.开发针对肿瘤的 PRO-CTCAE 项目集:在三家德国门诊癌症中心的横断面调查分析。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Jul 5;23(1):629. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11115-7.
9
Evaluating the use of the EORTC patient-reported outcome measures for improving inter-rater reliability of CTCAE ratings in a mixed population of cancer patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.评估 EORTC 患者报告结局测量在混合癌症患者人群中提高 CTCAE 评分的观察者间可靠性的应用:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Oct 13;21(1):849. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04745-w.
10
Patient reported outcomes in evaluation of chemotherapy toxicity in women with gynecologic malignancies: A pilot study.妇科恶性肿瘤患者化疗毒性评估中的患者报告结局:一项初步研究。
Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Sep;150(3):487-493. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.07.008. Epub 2018 Jul 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-Reported Outcomes in Phase 3 Clinical Trials for Blood Cancers: A Systematic Review.血液癌三期临床试验中的病患报告结局:系统性回顾。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2414425. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.14425.