• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项比较长脉冲755纳米激光和532纳米皮秒激光去除皮赘疗效的颈部劈开式病例对照研究。

A Pilot Split-Neck Case Study to Compare the Efficacy of the Long-Pulsed 755 nm Laser and the 532 nm Picosecond Laser for Acrochordon Removal.

作者信息

Park Jong Heon, Jeong Jae Yeong, Ryu Hwa Jung, Kim Il-Hwan

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, Korea.

出版信息

Ann Dermatol. 2023 May;35(Suppl 1):S67-S70. doi: 10.5021/ad.20.291.

DOI:10.5021/ad.20.291
PMID:37853869
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10608399/
Abstract

Cutaneous papillomas or acrochorda usually appear after the 4th decade of life in areas with skin folds. Conventional methods of removal are associated with bleeding problems, pain and prolonged sequelae. Thus, acrochorda removal with lasers has gained attention. In this study, we compared the efficacy of two popular laser types with different wavelengths and pulse widths for removal of skin tags. A 60-year-old Korean male noticed skin tags on his neck bilaterally. All tags were treated in a single session, on one side with a picosecond (ps)-domain 532 nm Nd:YAG laser and on the contralateral side with a long-pulsed (LP) 755 nm alexandrite laser. The endpoint for the ps-532 laser was immediate whitening, while that for the LP and quasi-LP (QLP) 755 lasers were visible changes on the surface of the lesion. Antibiotic ointment was applied, dressing was done and clinical photographs were taken. Both lasers effectively removed the skin tags at all settings in a single session without bleeding and with minimal discomfort. Crust formation occurred on both sides with natural shedding within 1 to 2 weeks. Transient erythema lasted longer in the tags treated with the ps-532 laser. At the 5th month of follow-up, residual lesions were detected on the field treated with the ps-532 laser. No persistent side effects such as scarring or postinflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) were observed. In conclusion, both the ps-532 nm Nd:YAG and the 755 nm alexandrite lasers ensured safe and effective removal of skin tags in a single session without adverse sequelae.

摘要

皮肤乳头状瘤或皮赘通常在40岁以后出现在皮肤褶皱部位。传统的去除方法会带来出血问题、疼痛和长期后遗症。因此,激光去除皮赘受到了关注。在本研究中,我们比较了两种不同波长和脉宽的常用激光去除皮肤赘生物的疗效。一名60岁的韩国男性双侧颈部出现皮肤赘生物。所有赘生物均在一次治疗中处理,一侧使用皮秒(ps)波段532 nm Nd:YAG激光,对侧使用长脉冲(LP)755 nm翠绿宝石激光。ps-532激光的终点是即时变白,而LP和准LP(QLP)755激光的终点是病变表面可见的变化。涂抹抗生素软膏,进行包扎并拍摄临床照片。两种激光在所有设置下均能在一次治疗中有效去除皮肤赘生物,无出血且不适最小。两侧均形成结痂,并在1至2周内自然脱落。ps-532激光治疗的赘生物处短暂红斑持续时间更长。在随访的第5个月,在ps-532激光治疗区域检测到残留病变。未观察到诸如瘢痕形成或炎症后色素沉着(PIH)等持续性副作用。总之,ps-532 nm Nd:YAG激光和755 nm翠绿宝石激光均能在一次治疗中安全有效地去除皮肤赘生物,且无不良后遗症。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26a/10608399/fb5fe901f1ba/ad-35-S67-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26a/10608399/6d9db2655227/ad-35-S67-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26a/10608399/895b7e6eeb84/ad-35-S67-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26a/10608399/db123b0c97ed/ad-35-S67-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26a/10608399/fb5fe901f1ba/ad-35-S67-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26a/10608399/6d9db2655227/ad-35-S67-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26a/10608399/895b7e6eeb84/ad-35-S67-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26a/10608399/db123b0c97ed/ad-35-S67-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26a/10608399/fb5fe901f1ba/ad-35-S67-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
A Pilot Split-Neck Case Study to Compare the Efficacy of the Long-Pulsed 755 nm Laser and the 532 nm Picosecond Laser for Acrochordon Removal.一项比较长脉冲755纳米激光和532纳米皮秒激光去除皮赘疗效的颈部劈开式病例对照研究。
Ann Dermatol. 2023 May;35(Suppl 1):S67-S70. doi: 10.5021/ad.20.291.
2
Treatment of pigmentary disorders in patients with skin of color with a novel 755 nm picosecond, Q-switched ruby, and Q-switched Nd:YAG nanosecond lasers: A retrospective photographic review.用新型755纳米皮秒、调Q红宝石和调Q钕:钇铝石榴石纳秒激光治疗有色人种患者色素沉着性疾病:一项回顾性照片评估。
Lasers Surg Med. 2016 Feb;48(2):181-7. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22454.
3
A side-by-side comparative study of 1064 nm Nd:YAG, 810 nm diode and 755 nm alexandrite lasers for treatment of 0.3-3 mm leg veins.1064纳米钕钇铝石榴石激光、810纳米二极管激光和755纳米翠绿宝石激光治疗0.3 - 3毫米腿部静脉的并列比较研究
Dermatol Surg. 2002 Mar;28(3):224-30. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2002.01162.x.
4
Comparison of long-pulsed alexandrite and Nd:YAG lasers, individually and in combination, for leg hair reduction: an assessor-blinded, randomized trial with 18 months of follow-up.长脉冲翠绿宝石激光与Nd:YAG激光单独及联合用于腿部脱毛的比较:一项设盲评估的随机试验,随访18个月
Arch Dermatol. 2008 Oct;144(10):1323-7. doi: 10.1001/archderm.144.10.1323.
5
A single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial comparing efficacy between low-fluence alexandrite 755-nm picosecond laser and low-fluence neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) 1064-nm picosecond laser for the treatment of ultraviolet B-induced hyperpigmentation.一项单盲、随机、对照临床试验比较了低能量亚历山大石 755nm 皮秒激光和低能量掺钕钇铝石榴石(Nd:YAG)1064nm 皮秒激光治疗紫外线 B 诱导的色素沉着的疗效。
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022 Mar;21(3):1036-1044. doi: 10.1111/jocd.14591. Epub 2021 Nov 13.
6
Split-face comparison of the picosecond 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser using a microlens array and the quasi-long-pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser for treatment of photoaging facial wrinkles and pores in Asians.微透镜阵列皮秒 1064nmNd:YAG 激光与准长脉冲 1064nmNd:YAG 激光治疗亚洲人光老化面部皱纹和毛孔的对比研究
Lasers Med Sci. 2020 Jun;35(4):949-956. doi: 10.1007/s10103-019-02906-1. Epub 2019 Nov 16.
7
Split lesion randomized comparative study between long pulsed Nd:YAG laser 532 and 1,064 nm in treatment of facial port-wine stain.长脉冲532nm和1064nm Nd:YAG激光治疗面部葡萄酒色斑的分割病变随机对照研究
Lasers Surg Med. 2016 Nov;48(9):852-858. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22584. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
8
A retrospective analysis on the management of pigmented lesions using a picosecond 755-nm alexandrite laser in Asians.一项关于在亚洲人身上使用皮秒755纳米翠绿宝石激光治疗色素性病变的回顾性分析。
Lasers Surg Med. 2016 Jan;48(1):23-9. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22443. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
9
Laser removal of tattoos.激光去除纹身
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2001;2(1):21-5. doi: 10.2165/00128071-200102010-00004.
10
A comparative study with a 755 nm picosecond Alexandrite laser with a diffractive lens array and a 532 nm/1064 nm Nd:YAG with a holographic optic.一项使用带有衍射透镜阵列的755纳米皮秒翠绿宝石激光与使用全息光学元件的532纳米/1064纳米钕:钇铝石榴石激光的对比研究。
Lasers Surg Med. 2018 Jan;50(1):37-44. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22752. Epub 2017 Nov 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Evolution of the Picosecond Laser: A Review of Literature.皮秒激光的发展历程:文献综述
Dermatol Surg. 2019 Feb;45(2):183-194. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001697.
2
Picosecond laser with specialized optic for facial rejuvenation using a compressed treatment interval.采用压缩治疗间隔的用于面部年轻化的配备特殊光学装置的皮秒激光。
Lasers Surg Med. 2016 Oct;48(8):723-726. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22551. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
3
Skin tags: a useful clinical sign for insulin resistance?皮肤赘生物:胰岛素抵抗的一个有用临床体征?
Eur J Dermatol. 2012 Jan-Feb;22(1):5-6. doi: 10.1684/ejd.2011.1588.
4
The metabolic profile in patients with skin tags.皮肤赘生物患者的代谢特征。
Clin Exp Med. 2010 Sep;10(3):193-7. doi: 10.1007/s10238-009-0086-5. Epub 2009 Dec 24.
5
Standard guidelines of care: CO2 laser for removal of benign skin lesions and resurfacing.标准护理指南:使用二氧化碳激光去除良性皮肤病变及进行皮肤表面重塑。
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2008 Jan;74 Suppl:S61-7.
6
Friction induced skin tags.摩擦引起的皮赘。
Dermatol Online J. 2008 Mar 15;14(3):18.
7
Common benign skin tumors.常见的良性皮肤肿瘤。
Am Fam Physician. 2003 Feb 15;67(4):729-38.
8
Residual thermal damage resulting from pulsed and scanned resurfacing lasers.
Dermatol Surg. 1999 Oct;25(10):739-44. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.1999.99024.x.