Tan Haining, Liu Yuquan, Li Guangpeng, Yu LingJia, Yang Yong, Lo Yuanshun, Bin Zhu, Li Xiang
Department of Orthopaedics, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, Beijing, China.
Division of Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, China Medical University Beigang Hospital, China Medical University, Yunlin, Taiwan.
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 25;15(7):e087863. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087863.
Unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) technique and uniportal endoscopic (UE) technique have both been used to treat lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) with satisfactory outcomes. Although previous studies have reported no difference in clinical outcomes between UBE and UE techniques, the evidence was weak due to the lack of a prospective design. Therefore, the present prospective study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of UBE and UE for treating patients with LSS.
This single-centre, prospective, non-randomised cohort trial is designed to compare the efficacy and safety of UBE and UE in treating patients with LSS. We will include 120 participants (60 per group) with single-level or double-level LSS. The primary outcome will be determined using the Oswestry Disability Index at the 12-month postoperative follow-up between the two groups. Secondary outcomes will include the following: visual analogue scale scores for lower back and leg pain, Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, modified MacNab criteria, Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, operation time, blood loss and duration of postoperative hospital stay. Radiographic outcomes will include the enlargement ratio of the dural sac, bony decompression range and preservation rate of the facet joint measured on postoperative radiological data. Laboratory outcomes will include postoperative creatine kinase level and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Adverse events will be recorded to assess safety. Participants will be assessed by a blinded assessor preoperatively and postoperatively at 3 days, 2 weeks, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months.
This study received approval from the Institutional Review Board of Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University (2022-P2-336-02). All participants will provide informed consent prior to enrolment, and the study will be conducted in strict accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Study results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and presentations at academic conferences.
ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06365229) and Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200066192).
单侧双通道内镜(UBE)技术和单通道内镜(UE)技术均已用于治疗腰椎管狭窄症(LSS),且疗效满意。尽管先前的研究报告称UBE和UE技术在临床疗效上无差异,但由于缺乏前瞻性设计,证据并不充分。因此,本前瞻性研究旨在比较UBE和UE治疗LSS患者的疗效和安全性。
本单中心、前瞻性、非随机队列试验旨在比较UBE和UE治疗LSS患者的疗效和安全性。我们将纳入120例单节段或双节段LSS患者(每组60例)。主要结局将通过两组术后12个月随访时的Oswestry功能障碍指数来确定。次要结局将包括以下内容:下背部和腿部疼痛的视觉模拟量表评分、日本骨科协会评分、改良MacNab标准、医学结局研究简明健康调查36项量表、手术时间、失血量和术后住院时间。影像学结局将包括根据术后放射学数据测量的硬膜囊扩大率、骨性减压范围和小关节保留率。实验室结局将包括术后肌酸激酶水平和红细胞沉降率。记录不良事件以评估安全性。术前以及术后3天、2周、1、3、6和12个月将由一名盲法评估者对参与者进行评估。
本研究获得首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院伦理委员会批准(2022-P2-336-02)。所有参与者在入组前将提供知情同意书,研究将严格按照《赫尔辛基宣言》进行。研究结果将通过同行评审出版物和在学术会议上的报告进行传播。
ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT06365229)和中国临床试验注册中心(ChiCTR2200066192)。