Suppr超能文献

诊断标准对痴呆症患病率的影响——来自瑞典哥德堡的一项基于人群的研究。

The Effect of Diagnostic Criteria on Dementia Prevalence - A Population-Based Study From Gothenburg, Sweden.

机构信息

Neuropsychiatric Epidemiology Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry (HW, JN, TRS, SK, IS), Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden; Centre for Ageing and Health (AGECAP) at the University of Gothenburg (HW, JN, TRS, SK, IS), Sweden.

Neuropsychiatric Epidemiology Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry (HW, JN, TRS, SK, IS), Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden; Centre for Ageing and Health (AGECAP) at the University of Gothenburg (HW, JN, TRS, SK, IS), Sweden; Region Västra Götaland (JN, SK, IS), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Psychiatry, Cognition and Old Age Psychiatry Clinic, Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2024 Feb;32(2):230-243. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2023.08.018. Epub 2023 Sep 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine how the use of different diagnostic criteria (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders third revised, fourth, and fifth editions [DSM-III-R, DSM-IV, and DSM-5], and the 10th and 11th editions of the International Classification of Diseases [ICD-10 and ICD-11] influences the reported prevalence of dementia.

METHODS

Two cross-sectional population-based studies of systematically selected 85-year-olds in Gothenburg, Sweden, (N = 774), were examined in comprehensive health examinations including comprehensive neurocognitive examinations. Five algorithms based on the diagnostic criteria in the DSM-III-R, DSM-IV, DSM-5, ICD-10, and ICD-11 were created, including 105 different variables that were operationalized in different ways to match the criteria of each classification system.

RESULTS

ICD-11 yielded the highest prevalence of dementia (36.4%), followed by DSM-5 (32.9%), DSM-IV (30.7%), the clinical consensus DSM-III-R diagnosis (26.7%), DSM-III-R (21.4%), and ICD-10 (20.5%). The agreement between the DSM-5 and the ICD-11 was κ = 0.9. All other kappa values ranged between 0.6 and 0.9.

CONCLUSIONS

The choice of diagnostic criteria has a large effect on the estimated prevalence of dementia. We found that the recent editions, the DSM-5 and ICD-11, gave a higher prevalence of dementia than older editions. We also show that the attempts to harmonize DSM and ICD have in part been successful, however, there are still differences between the systems.

摘要

目的

研究使用不同诊断标准(《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本、第四版和第五版[DSM-III-R、DSM-IV 和 DSM-5],以及《国际疾病分类》第十版和第十一版[ICD-10 和 ICD-11])如何影响痴呆的报告患病率。

方法

对瑞典哥德堡的两项基于人群的 85 岁老年人横断面研究(N=774)进行了检查,这些研究在全面健康检查中包括全面的神经认知检查。根据 DSM-III-R、DSM-IV、DSM-5、ICD-10 和 ICD-11 的诊断标准制定了五个算法,包括 105 个不同的变量,这些变量以不同的方式操作以匹配每个分类系统的标准。

结果

ICD-11 得出的痴呆患病率最高(36.4%),其次是 DSM-5(32.9%)、DSM-IV(30.7%)、临床共识 DSM-III-R 诊断(26.7%)、DSM-III-R(21.4%)和 ICD-10(20.5%)。DSM-5 和 ICD-11 之间的一致性为κ=0.9。其他所有κ值在 0.6 和 0.9 之间。

结论

诊断标准的选择对痴呆估计患病率有很大影响。我们发现,最近的版本 DSM-5 和 ICD-11 比旧版本给出了更高的痴呆患病率。我们还表明,DSM 和 ICD 之间的协调尝试在一定程度上取得了成功,但两个系统之间仍然存在差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验