• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《专家结果与障碍分析量表芬兰语版:心理测量学特性评估》

Finnish Version of the Specialist Outcomes and Barriers Analysis Scale: Evaluation of Psychometric Properties.

机构信息

Author Affiliations: PhD student (Ms Wright), Professor (Dr Kvist), University lecturer (Dr Jokiniemi), Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health Sciences; and Research Manager (Dr Mikkonen), Department of Technical Physics, Faculty of Science and Forestry, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio.

出版信息

Clin Nurse Spec. 2023;37(6):281-290. doi: 10.1097/NUR.0000000000000779.

DOI:10.1097/NUR.0000000000000779
PMID:37870514
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10886455/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Finnish version of the Specialist Outcomes and Barriers Analysis Scale.

DESIGN

This was a cross-sectional survey study.

METHODS

Cultural adaptation of the translation and content validity of the translated instrument were assessed by expert panelists (n = 5) using the content validity index. The construct validity was assessed with principal component analysis using the survey data of Finnish registered nurses (n = 60). Scale reliability was assessed with Cronbach's α values. All study phases were conducted in 2021.

RESULTS

The items (n = 59) of the scale were critically evaluated by the experts. The full-scale content validity was revealed as excellent (0.92). In terms of construct validity, the scale was analyzed separately for outcomes and barriers. The outcomes section revealed a 5-component structure with an overall Cronbach's α coefficient of .96, and the barriers section, a 2-component structure with an overall Cronbach's α coefficient of .82, indicating adequate reliability of the scale.

CONCLUSION

The Finnish version of the scale showed excellent content and construct validity. The Cronbach's α values represented adequate reliability of the Specialist Outcomes and Barriers Analysis scale when measuring nurses' perceived practice outcomes and barriers in the Finnish context.

摘要

目的

评估芬兰版专家成果与障碍分析量表的心理测量学特性。

设计

这是一项横断面调查研究。

方法

通过专家小组(n=5)使用内容效度指数评估翻译的文化适应性和翻译工具的内容效度。使用芬兰注册护士的调查数据(n=60)进行主成分分析评估结构效度。使用 Cronbach's α 值评估量表的可靠性。所有研究阶段均于 2021 年进行。

结果

量表的项目(n=59)经专家严格评估。全量表内容效度显示为优秀(0.92)。在结构效度方面,量表分别对成果和障碍进行分析。成果部分呈现出 5 个组成部分的结构,总体 Cronbach's α 系数为.96,障碍部分呈现出 2 个组成部分的结构,总体 Cronbach's α 系数为.82,表明该量表具有足够的可靠性。

结论

量表的芬兰版本显示出优秀的内容和结构效度。在芬兰背景下测量护士感知的实践成果和障碍时,Cronbach's α 值代表了专家成果与障碍分析量表的可靠性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b6b/10886455/561076acfbb1/cns-37-281-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b6b/10886455/f69c95020da4/cns-37-281-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b6b/10886455/561076acfbb1/cns-37-281-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b6b/10886455/f69c95020da4/cns-37-281-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b6b/10886455/561076acfbb1/cns-37-281-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Finnish Version of the Specialist Outcomes and Barriers Analysis Scale: Evaluation of Psychometric Properties.《专家结果与障碍分析量表芬兰语版:心理测量学特性评估》
Clin Nurse Spec. 2023;37(6):281-290. doi: 10.1097/NUR.0000000000000779.
2
Reliability and Validity of The Finnish Version of The Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire among Surgically Treated Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Patients.《芬兰版波士顿腕管综合征问卷在手术治疗腕管综合征患者中的信度和效度》。
Scand J Surg. 2020 Dec;109(4):343-350. doi: 10.1177/1457496919851607. Epub 2019 May 27.
3
Reliability and validity of the Finnish version of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS).芬兰语版下肢功能量表(LEFS)的信度和效度
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Jun;39(12):1228-1234. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1193230. Epub 2016 Jul 6.
4
Development and validation of Nurses' Moral Courage Scale.护士道德勇气量表的编制与验证。
Nurs Ethics. 2019 Nov-Dec;26(7-8):2438-2455. doi: 10.1177/0969733018791325. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
5
Psychometric assessment of the Chinese version of the Problems and Needs in Palliative Care questionnaire-short version in advanced cancer patients.中文版晚期癌症患者舒缓护理问题和需求问卷简表的心理计量学评估。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Aug 6;18(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0450-5.
6
Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Cultural Competence Scale in Clinical Nurses.临床护士文化能力量表波斯语版本的心理测量学特性
Nurs Open. 2022 Mar;9(2):1218-1227. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1163. Epub 2021 Dec 18.
7
Professional autonomy among Registered Nurses-Validation of the translation of the Dempster Practice Behaviour Scale and survey results.注册护士的专业自主性——Dempster 实践行为量表的翻译验证及调查结果。
Nurs Open. 2024 May;11(5):e2185. doi: 10.1002/nop2.2185.
8
Chinese version of the clinical supervision self-assessment tool: Assessment of reliability and validity.临床督导自我评估工具中文版:信效度评估
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Mar;98:104734. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104734. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
9
Psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Pulmonary Rehabilitation Adapted Index of Self-Efficacy (PRAISE) for individuals with COPD.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者适用的韩语版肺康复自我效能适应性指数(PRAISE)的心理测量特性。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017 Aug 29;12:2611-2620. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S142488. eCollection 2017.
10
Cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the nurse-specific end-of-life professional caregiver survey: a cross-sectional study.护士特定临终专业照护者量表中文版的文化调适与心理计量学评估:一项横断面研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Feb 16;20(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00725-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Advanced practice role delineation within Finland: A comparative descriptive study.芬兰高级实践角色界定:一项比较描述性研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2022 Jun;78(6):1665-1675. doi: 10.1111/jan.15074. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
2
The association between advanced practice nursing roles and outcomes in adults following cardiac surgery: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.成人心脏手术后高级实践护理角色与结局的相关性:随机对照试验的系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Oct;122:104028. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.104028. Epub 2021 Jul 3.
3
Core competencies of clinical nurse specialists: A comparison across three Nordic countries.
临床护理专家的核心能力:三个北欧国家的比较。
J Clin Nurs. 2021 Dec;30(23-24):3601-3610. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15882. Epub 2021 Jun 6.
4
Stoma formation as a palliative procedure: the role of the clinical nurse specialist in maintaining quality of life.造口形成作为一种姑息治疗手段:临床护理专家在维持生活质量方面的作用。
Br J Nurs. 2021 Mar 25;30(6):S4-S10. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2021.30.6.S4.
5
Patient experiences of alcohol specialist nurse interventions in a general hospital, and onwards care pathways.患者在综合医院接受酒精专科护士干预及后续护理途径的体验。
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Apr;77(4):1945-1955. doi: 10.1111/jan.14777. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
6
United States: Health System Review.美国:医疗体系评价。
Health Syst Transit. 2020 Dec;22(4):1-441.
7
Strategies for reducing hospital nurse turnover in South Korea: Nurses' perceptions and suggestions.韩国降低医院护士离职率的策略:护士的看法与建议。
J Nurs Manag. 2021 Jul;29(5):1256-1262. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13264. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
8
The relationship between job satisfaction and turnover intention among nurses in Axum comprehensive and specialized hospital Tigray, Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚提格雷州阿克苏姆综合专科医院护士工作满意度与离职意愿之间的关系。
BMC Nurs. 2020 Aug 18;19:79. doi: 10.1186/s12912-020-00468-0. eCollection 2020.
9
Evidence-informed policymaking: Modelling nurses' career pathway from registered nurse to advanced practice nurse.循证决策:构建护士从注册护士到高级实践护士的职业发展路径模型
Int J Nurs Pract. 2020 Feb;26(1):e12777. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12777. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
10
Does the Diabetes Specialist Nursing workforce impact the experiences and outcomes of people with diabetes? A hermeneutic review of the evidence.糖尿病专科护理人员队伍是否会影响糖尿病患者的体验和结果?对证据的诠释性回顾。
Hum Resour Health. 2019 Aug 7;17(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12960-019-0401-5.