• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

西班牙背景下产科暴力量表心理测量学特性的文化调适、效度验证与评估

Cultural Adaptation, Validation and Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of an Obstetric Violence Scale in the Spanish Context.

作者信息

González-de la Torre Héctor, González-Artero Paula Nikola, Muñoz de León-Ortega Daniel, Lancha-de la Cruz María Reyes, Verdú-Soriano José

机构信息

Department of Nursing, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Edificio Ciencias de la Salud, C/Blas Cabrera Felipe s/n, CP 35016 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.

Research Support Unit of Insular Maternal and Child University Hospital Complex of Gran Canaria, Canary Health Service, Avda Marítima del Sur s/n, CP 35016 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.

出版信息

Nurs Rep. 2023 Oct 3;13(4):1368-1387. doi: 10.3390/nursrep13040115.

DOI:10.3390/nursrep13040115
PMID:37873822
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10594477/
Abstract

Obstetric violence refers to dehumanized or derogative treatment of women in their pregnancy, childbirth or postpartum periods and may be manifested in different ways. Currently, there is no tool validated in Spain to measure women's perception of obstetric violence. The objective of this study was to carry out the cultural adaptation and validation of an existing 14-item obstetric violence scale in the Spanish context and to evaluate its psychometric properties. The research was conducted in two phases: first, a methodological study designed to evaluate content validity, through assessments by eight experts (calculating the Aiken V coefficient) and face validity in a sample of 20 women; second, a cross-sectional study to evaluate construct validity (through confirmatory factor analysis and Rasch analysis), divergent validity against a scale of birth satisfaction, known-groups validity and, finally, reliability. In Phase 1, Aiken V values higher than 0.71 were obtained for all items. Phase 2 was conducted on a sample of 256 women and the fit values for the unidimensional model were RMSEA: 0.070 (95% CI: 0.059-0.105) and GFI: 0.982 (95% CI: 0.823-0.990). The Rasch analysis indicated poor performance of item 2, which was removed. The Omega and Cronbach's Alpha coefficients were 0.863 and 0.860, respectively. A final 13-item version of the Obstetric Violence Scale was produced, with a total score ranging from 0 (no obstetric violence perception) to 52 (maximum obstetric violence perception). The Obstetric Violence Scale is a reliable and useful tool to measure women's perception of obstetric violence. This study was not registered.

摘要

产科暴力是指在女性怀孕、分娩或产后期间对其进行的非人性化或贬低性对待,可能有不同的表现形式。目前,西班牙尚无经过验证的工具来衡量女性对产科暴力的感知。本研究的目的是在西班牙背景下对现有的14项产科暴力量表进行文化调适和验证,并评估其心理测量特性。该研究分两个阶段进行:第一阶段,进行一项方法学研究,旨在通过8位专家的评估(计算艾肯V系数)来评估内容效度,并在20名女性样本中评估表面效度;第二阶段,进行一项横断面研究,以评估结构效度(通过验证性因素分析和拉施分析)、与分娩满意度量表的区分效度、已知群体效度,最后评估信度。在第一阶段,所有项目的艾肯V值均高于0.71。第二阶段在256名女性样本上进行,单维模型的拟合值为:RMSEA:0.070(95%CI:0.059 - 0.105)和GFI:0.982(95%CI:0.823 - 0.990)。拉施分析表明第2项表现不佳,将其删除。欧米伽系数和克朗巴哈α系数分别为0.863和0.860。最终生成了一个13项的产科暴力量表版本,总分范围从0(无产科暴力感知)到52(最大产科暴力感知)。产科暴力量表是衡量女性对产科暴力感知的可靠且有用的工具。本研究未进行注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa05/10594477/365a96ece478/nursrep-13-00115-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa05/10594477/447f560b5902/nursrep-13-00115-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa05/10594477/365a96ece478/nursrep-13-00115-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa05/10594477/447f560b5902/nursrep-13-00115-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa05/10594477/365a96ece478/nursrep-13-00115-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Cultural Adaptation, Validation and Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of an Obstetric Violence Scale in the Spanish Context.西班牙背景下产科暴力量表心理测量学特性的文化调适、效度验证与评估
Nurs Rep. 2023 Oct 3;13(4):1368-1387. doi: 10.3390/nursrep13040115.
2
Cultural adaptation, validation and evaluation of the psychometric properties of Childbirth Experience Questionnaire version 2.0 in the Spanish context.文化调适、验证及评估西班牙文版生育经验问卷 2.0 的心理计量特性。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Mar 19;24(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06400-7.
3
The Spanish version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ-E): reliability and validity assessment.《分娩体验问卷》西班牙语版(CEQ-E):信度与效度评估
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Nov 24;16(1):372. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1100-z.
4
Validation and Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Version of the Fear of Childbirth Questionnaire (CFQ-e).《分娩恐惧问卷》西班牙语版(CFQ-e)的效度及心理测量特性
J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 26;11(7):1843. doi: 10.3390/jcm11071843.
5
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Portuguese Version of the Multidimensional Scale of Dating Violence 2.0 in Young University Students.《多维约会暴力量表2.0葡萄牙语版本在青年大学生中的跨文化适应与验证》
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Mar 30;12(7):759. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12070759.
6
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Perceptions of Empowerment in Midwifery Scale in the Spanish Context (PEMS-e).《西班牙背景下助产士赋权认知量表(PEMS-e)的跨文化适应与验证》
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 May 18;11(10):1464. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11101464.
7
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the psychometric properties of the Quality from the Patient's Perspective I Questionnaire translated into Spanish.《患者视角下的质量问卷 I》翻译成西班牙语后的跨文化适应及其心理测量特性的验证。
Midwifery. 2017 Dec;55:75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.09.005. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
8
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the postpartum depression literacy scale.产后抑郁知识量表中文版的跨文化适应及心理测量特性
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 9;13:966770. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.966770. eCollection 2022.
9
Structural and construct validity of the Quality of Life Scale among Canadian women with histories of intimate partner violence.加拿大有亲密伴侣暴力史的女性生活质量量表的结构和建构有效性。
Womens Health (Lond). 2022 Jan-Dec;18:17455057221125574. doi: 10.1177/17455057221125574.
10
Short version of the Multidimensional Scale of Dating Violence (MSDV 2.0) in Spanish-language: Instrument development and psychometric evaluation.西班牙语版约会暴力多维量表(MSDV 2.0)简版:工具开发与心理测量评估
J Adv Nurs. 2023 Apr;79(4):1610-1631. doi: 10.1111/jan.15300. Epub 2022 May 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Qualitative Study of Maternity Healthcare Vulnerability Based on Women's Experiences in Different Sociocultural Context.基于不同社会文化背景下女性经历的孕产妇保健脆弱性定性研究
Nurs Rep. 2025 Mar 18;15(3):105. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15030105.
2
Psychometric Evaluation of Women's Knowledge of Healthcare Rights and Perception of Resource Scarcity during Maternity.女性在孕期对医疗保健权利的认知及资源稀缺感知的心理测量评估
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Oct 15;12(20):2045. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12202045.
3
Factors Associated with Obstetric Violence Implicated in the Development of Postpartum Depression and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: A Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
The Turkish version of the students' perceptions of respectful maternity care scale: An assessment of psychometric properties.学生对尊重产妇护理感知量表的土耳其语版本:心理测量特性评估。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2023 Jul;70:103684. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103684. Epub 2023 Jun 23.
2
Perception of health sciences and feminist medical students about obstetric violence.健康科学感知与女医学生对产科暴力的看法。
Enferm Clin (Engl Ed). 2023 May-Jun;33(3):234-243. doi: 10.1016/j.enfcle.2023.02.007. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
3
Childbirth, trauma and family relationships.
与产后抑郁症和创伤后应激障碍发生相关的产科暴力因素:一项系统综述
Nurs Rep. 2023 Nov 1;13(4):1553-1576. doi: 10.3390/nursrep13040130.
分娩、创伤与家庭关系。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2023;14(1):2157481. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2022.2157481.
4
Obstetric Violence from a Midwife Perspective.从助产士的角度看产科暴力。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 10;20(6):4930. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20064930.
5
A qualitative analysis of obstetric violence in rural Madagascar.马达加斯加农村地区产科暴力的定性分析。
Heliyon. 2023 Feb 23;9(3):e13905. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13905. eCollection 2023 Mar.
6
The incidence of post-traumatic stress disorder following traumatic childbirth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.创伤性分娩后创伤后应激障碍的发生率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023 Jul;162(1):211-221. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14643. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
7
Risk Factors for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder after Childbirth: A Systematic Review.产后创伤后应激障碍的风险因素:一项系统综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Oct 26;12(11):2598. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12112598.
8
Experiences with obstetric violence among healthcare professionals and students in Spain: A constructivist grounded theory study.西班牙医疗保健专业人员和学生遭遇产科暴力的经历:一项建构主义扎根理论研究。
Women Birth. 2023 Mar;36(2):e219-e226. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2022.07.169. Epub 2022 Jul 31.
9
Analysis of the Concept of Obstetric Violence: Scoping Review Protocol.产科暴力概念分析:范围综述方案
J Pers Med. 2022 Jun 30;12(7):1090. doi: 10.3390/jpm12071090.
10
Obstetric violence and associated factors among women during facility based childbirth at Gedeo Zone, South Ethiopia.产科暴力及相关因素在埃塞俄比亚贡德尔地区医疗机构分娩的产妇中的表现
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Jul 14;22(1):565. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04895-6.