Department of Behavioral Science and Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, 845 Angliana Avenue, Room 204, Lexington, KY 40508, USA.
Substance Use Research Priority Area, University of Kentucky, 845 Angliana Avenue, Room 121, Lexington, KY 40508, USA.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2022 Mar 1;232:109336. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109336. Epub 2022 Jan 29.
Research on the impact of Medicaid expansion on buprenorphine utilization has largely focused on the Medicaid program. Less is known about its associations with total buprenorphine utilization and non-Medicaid payers.
Monthly prescription data (June 2013-May 2018) for proprietary and generic sublingual as well as buccal buprenorphine products were purchased from IQVIA®. Population-adjusted state-level utilization measures were constructed for Medicaid, commercial insurance, Medicare, cash, and total utilization. A difference-in-differences (DID) approach with population weights estimated the association between Medicaid expansion and buprenorphine utilization, while controlling for treatment capacity.
Monthly total buprenorphine prescriptions increased by 68% overall and increased 283% for Medicaid, 30% for commercial insurance, and 143% for Medicare. Cash prescriptions decreased by 10%. The DID estimate for Medicaid expansion was not statistically significant for total utilization (-19.780, 95% CI = -45.118, 5.558, p = .123). For Medicaid buprenorphine utilization, there was a significant increase of 27.120 prescriptions per 100,000 total state residents (95% CI = 9.458, 44.782, p = .003) in expansion states versus non-expansion states post-Medicaid expansion. Medicaid expansion had a negative effect on commercial insurance (DID estimate = -37.745, 95% CI = -62.946, -12.544, p = .004), cash utilization (DID estimate = -6.675, 95% CI = -12.627, -0.723, p = .029), and Medicare utilization (DID estimate = -1.855, 95% CI = -3.697, -0.013, p = .048).
The associations between Medicaid expansion and buprenorphine utilization varied across different types of payers, such that the overall impact of Medicaid expansion on buprenorphine utilization was not significant.
关于医疗补助计划扩大对丁丙诺啡使用影响的研究主要集中在医疗补助计划上。对于其与丁丙诺啡总使用量和非医疗补助支付者之间的关系,人们了解较少。
从 IQVIA®购买了专有和通用舌下和颊用丁丙诺啡产品的月度处方数据(2013 年 6 月至 2018 年 5 月)。根据人口调整了州级使用率衡量标准,包括医疗补助、商业保险、医疗保险、现金和总使用率。采用差异-差异(DID)方法,并使用人口权重估计医疗补助计划扩大与丁丙诺啡使用率之间的关联,同时控制治疗能力。
总体而言,每月丁丙诺啡总处方增加了 68%,其中医疗补助增加了 283%,商业保险增加了 30%,医疗保险增加了 143%。现金处方减少了 10%。DID 估计值对于总利用率没有统计学意义(-19.780,95%CI=-45.118,5.558,p=0.123)。对于医疗补助丁丙诺啡使用率,在医疗补助计划扩大后,扩张州与非扩张州相比,每 10 万总人口的丁丙诺啡使用量增加了 27.120 张处方(95%CI=9.458,44.782,p=0.003)。医疗补助计划扩大对商业保险(DID 估计值=-37.745,95%CI=-62.946,-12.544,p=0.004)、现金使用率(DID 估计值=-6.675,95%CI=-12.627,-0.723,p=0.029)和医疗保险使用率(DID 估计值=-1.855,95%CI=-3.697,-0.013,p=0.048)有负面影响。
医疗补助计划扩大与丁丙诺啡使用率之间的关联因不同类型的支付者而异,因此医疗补助计划扩大对丁丙诺啡使用率的总体影响并不显著。