Jautz Sabine, Graf Eva-Maria, Fleischhacker Melanie, Dionne Frédérick
Department of English, Faculty of Arts and Humanities, University of Siegen, Siegen, Germany.
Department of English, Faculty of Humanities and Education, University of Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt, Austria.
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 9;14:1232090. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1232090. eCollection 2023.
Agenda-setting is a central communicative task for professionals and a joint activity of all participants particularly at the onset of helping interactions such as coaching. Agreeing on goal(s) and assigning tasks alongside establishing a trustful bond prepare the ground for the success of the interaction. The professional agent initiates and sets the agenda as part of their professional role and responsibility, i.e., based on their professional epistemic and deontic authority. Concurrently, by orienting to clients' epistemic authority and by yielding power, control, and agency to clients to co-manage the ensuing interaction, agenda-setting is the first opportunity for client-centeredness, which is a central characteristic and success factor for the working alliance in coaching.
We take first steps in filling a research gap by providing a first analysis of the interactional unfolding of agenda-setting in coaching and by showcasing that and how agenda-setting as a joint activity of coach and client contributes to their working alliance. More precisely, we investigate agenda-management practices in five first sessions of business coaching to (1) document and analyze how the joint activity 'agenda-setting' is implemented via various (coach-initiated) social actions, (2) detail their contribution to establishing the working alliance, and (3) to interpret the emerging practices of agenda-management against the concept of 'client-centeredness'. For the analysis, we draw on conceptual and methodological resources from interactional linguistics alongside linguistic pragmatics and conversation analysis.
We found 117 instances of 'agenda-setting' in our data which can be assigned to the seven social actions "Delivering Agenda Information", "Requesting Agenda Information", "Requesting Agenda Agreement", "Requesting Agenda Action", "Suggesting Agenda Action", "Offering Agenda Action" and "Proposing Agenda Action".
The social actions display that agenda-setting serves to establish a common ground regarding goals, tasks and the relational bond of coach and client, and (after this has been achieved) to negotiate future coaching actions. Thus, the joint activity of 'doing' agenda-setting can be shown to be 'doing' working alliance at the same time.
议程设置是专业人士的一项核心沟通任务,也是所有参与者的共同活动,尤其是在诸如辅导等帮助性互动开始时。就目标达成一致并分配任务,同时建立信任关系,为互动的成功奠定基础。专业人员作为其专业角色和职责的一部分发起并设定议程,即基于他们的专业认知和道义权威。同时,通过尊重客户的认知权威,并将权力、控制权和自主权交给客户以共同管理后续互动,议程设置是以客户为中心的首次契机,这是辅导工作联盟的核心特征和成功因素。
我们通过对辅导中议程设置的互动展开进行首次分析,并展示议程设置作为教练和客户的共同活动如何促进他们的工作联盟,从而初步填补研究空白。更确切地说,我们调查了商业辅导前五节课程中的议程管理实践,以(1)记录和分析“议程设置”这一共同活动是如何通过各种(由教练发起的)社会行为来实施的,(2)详细说明它们对建立工作联盟的贡献,以及(3)根据“以客户为中心”的概念来解读出现的议程管理实践。为了进行分析,我们借鉴了互动语言学以及语言语用学和会话分析的概念和方法资源。
我们在数据中发现了117个“议程设置”实例,这些实例可归为七种社会行为,即“提供议程信息”“请求议程信息”“请求议程同意”“请求议程行动”“建议议程行动”“提供议程行动”和“提议议程行动”。
这些社会行为表明,议程设置有助于在目标、任务以及教练和客户的关系纽带方面建立共同基础,并且(在达成这一点之后)就未来的辅导行动进行协商。因此,可以证明“进行”议程设置的共同活动同时也是“建立”工作联盟。