Terblanche Nicky H D
University of Stellenbosch Business School Cape Town South Africa.
Hum Resour Dev Q. 2022 Nov 30. doi: 10.1002/hrdq.21490.
The chaotic initial stages of the Covid-19 pandemic severely challenged organizations. Economies shut down and millions of people were confined to their homes. Human resource practitioners turned to organizational coaching, a trusted human resource development intervention for help, however, to remain relevant during the crisis coaches had to adapt their praxis. The working alliance describes the mutual bond, goal, and task alignment between coach and client and is an indication of coaching efficacy. This study investigates to what extent organizational coaches' praxis adaptation at the start of the pandemic maintained a working alliance that still served the human resource development (HRD) paradigms of learning, performance, and meaningful work. Interviews with 26 organizational coaches from USA, UK, Australia, and South Africa recorded during the first general lockdown (April 2020) were inductively analyzed using thematic analysis and deductively interpreted through the working alliance theory and desired HRD outcome paradigms. Findings reveal seven organizational coaching praxis adaptations judged to support all three working alliance components, with "task" and "goal" more prominent than "bond," suggesting a pragmatist preference reminiscent of crisis management. Praxis adaptation also seems to promote all three HRD paradigms of learning, performance, and meaningful work on individual and/or organizational levels. This study strengthens the already well-established link between HRD and coaching by positing that coaching is a dynamic, pragmatic, self-adaptive intervention that supports HRD during a crisis. Understanding coaches' praxis adaptation during the volatile initial stages of a crisis is important for HRD theory and practice given HRDs increasing reliance on coaching.
新冠疫情初期的混乱局面给各组织带来了严峻挑战。经济停摆,数百万人被困家中。人力资源从业者求助于组织教练,这是一种值得信赖的人力资源开发干预手段。然而,为了在危机期间保持相关性,教练们不得不调整他们的实践方法。工作联盟描述了教练与客户之间的相互关系、目标和任务一致性,是教练效能的一个指标。本研究调查了在疫情初期组织教练的实践方法调整在多大程度上维持了一种仍服务于学习、绩效和有意义工作等人力资源开发范式的工作联盟。对2020年4月首次全面封锁期间来自美国、英国、澳大利亚和南非的26名组织教练进行的访谈,采用主题分析法进行归纳分析,并通过工作联盟理论和期望的人力资源开发成果范式进行演绎解读。研究结果揭示了七种被认为支持工作联盟所有三个组成部分的组织教练实践方法调整,其中“任务”和“目标”比“关系”更为突出,这表明存在一种类似于危机管理的实用主义偏好。实践方法调整似乎也在个人和/或组织层面上促进了学习、绩效和有意义工作这三种人力资源开发范式。本研究通过提出教练是一种在危机期间支持人力资源开发的动态、务实且自我适应的干预手段,加强了人力资源开发与教练之间已确立的紧密联系。鉴于人力资源开发对教练的依赖日益增加,了解危机动荡初期教练的实践方法调整对人力资源开发理论和实践具有重要意义。