Law School, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian, China.
Sci Prog. 2023 Oct-Dec;106(4):368504231191994. doi: 10.1177/00368504231191994.
The imminent discharge of Fukushima-contaminated water into the ocean would result in severe controversies and disputes concerning marine environment pollution in Japan and the neighboring countries. This paper argues that high similarities can be found between the disputes arising from the imminent discharge and those subject to compulsory conciliation under the dispute settlement mechanism of the law of the sea. Together with the advantages of compulsory conciliation in settling disputes related to the exercise of discretion by states, it is asserted that compulsory conciliation could become the best choice to settle the potential disputes arising from the imminent discharge between Japan and the neighboring countries. This article also draws attention to some essential issues related to the application of compulsory conciliation, including the establishment of jurisdiction and authorities of the conciliation commission, and the implementation of the conciliation report.
福岛核污染水排海在即,将引发日本及周边国家在海洋环境污染方面的严重争议和纠纷。本文认为,即将发生的排放事件所引发的争议,与海洋法争端解决机制下强制调解所涉及的争议存在高度相似性。结合强制调解在解决国家行使自由裁量权相关争议方面的优势,可以断言,强制调解可能成为解决日本与邻国之间因即将发生的排放事件而产生的潜在争议的最佳选择。本文还提请注意与强制调解的应用相关的一些重要问题,包括调解委员会的管辖权和权限的建立,以及调解报告的执行。