• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区医院中库尔特S-Plus V三分群血细胞分析仪的评估,包括其使用标准。

Evaluation of the Coulter S-Plus V three-part differential in a community hospital, including criteria for its use.

作者信息

Kalish R J, Becker K

出版信息

Am J Clin Pathol. 1986 Dec;86(6):751-5. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/86.6.751.

DOI:10.1093/ajcp/86.6.751
PMID:3788862
Abstract

The Coulter S-Plus V three-part differential was evaluated for its precision, correlation with 100-cell manual differentials, ability to process routine specimens without flagging, and ability to detect abnormalities as defined by manual differential. The instrument's precision is markedly greater than that of manual methods, especially in the mononuclear category. Correlation with manual differential lymphocyte, mononuclear, and granulocyte percentages was 0.91, 0.54, and 0.94, respectively. Eighty-four percent of routine samples could be processed by the instrument without further review. With the use of a combination of S-Plus V-generated flags and preset laboratory criteria, only 9% of abnormal manual differentials would have been undetected. Three-fourths of these undetected cases involved low-frequency abnormalities of questionable clinical significance. The three-part differential should be able to decrease the number of manual differentials that are performed, which would result in a cost savings to the laboratory.

摘要

对库尔特S-Plus V三分群血细胞分析仪进行了评估,内容包括其精密度、与100个细胞手工分类计数的相关性、处理常规标本而无需标记的能力以及检测手工分类计数所定义的异常的能力。该仪器的精密度明显高于手工方法,尤其是在单核细胞类别中。与手工分类计数的淋巴细胞、单核细胞和粒细胞百分比的相关性分别为0.91、0.54和0.94。84%的常规样本可由该仪器处理而无需进一步复查。使用S-Plus V生成的标记和预设的实验室标准相结合的方法,只有9%的异常手工分类计数会未被检测到。这些未被检测到的病例中有四分之三涉及临床意义存疑的低频异常。三分群血细胞分析仪应该能够减少所进行的手工分类计数的数量,这将为实验室节省成本。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the Coulter S-Plus V three-part differential in a community hospital, including criteria for its use.社区医院中库尔特S-Plus V三分群血细胞分析仪的评估,包括其使用标准。
Am J Clin Pathol. 1986 Dec;86(6):751-5. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/86.6.751.
2
Automated three-part leukocyte differential counts in the preoperative evaluation of ambulatory surgery patients.门诊手术患者术前评估中的自动三分群白细胞分类计数
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1987 Dec;111(12):1155-7.
3
Evaluation of the Coulter S-Plus IV three-part differential in an acute care hospital.在一家急症医院对库尔特S-Plus IV三分群血细胞分析仪的评估
Am J Clin Pathol. 1985 Jul;84(1):49-57. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/84.1.49.
4
Evaluation of Coulter S-Plus three-part differential in population with a high prevalence of abnormalities.在异常高患病率人群中对库尔特S-Plus三分群血细胞分析仪进行评估。
Am J Clin Pathol. 1985 Nov;84(5):620-6. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/84.5.620.
5
Evaluation of the Coulter Counter model S-Plus IV.库尔特计数器S-Plus IV型的评估。
Am J Clin Pathol. 1985 Sep;84(3):297-306. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/84.3.297.
6
Evaluation of the Beckman Coulter AcT 5 diff AL hematology analyzer in a hospital setting.贝克曼库尔特AcT 5 diff AL血液分析仪在医院环境中的评估
Lab Hematol. 2003;9(3):167-74.
7
Laboratory evaluation of the Coulter "three-part electronic differential".库尔特“三分群电子血细胞分析仪”的实验室评估
Am J Clin Pathol. 1985 May;83(5):547-54. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/83.5.547.
8
Evaluation and performance of the Coulter STKS.库尔特STKS的评估与性能
Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1993 Mar;31(3):179-86.
9
Evaluation of the Coulter S-Plus IV three-part differential as a screening tool in a tertiary care hospital.评估库尔特S-Plus IV三分类法作为三级医院筛查工具的性能。
Am J Clin Pathol. 1987 Jun;87(6):745-51. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/87.6.745.
10
Review of Coulter JR Interpretive Report and manual blood film assessment.
Can J Med Technol. 1990;52(4):220-7.