• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过野外监测和种群统计学模型估计狼的种群规模及动态变化:对管理和保护工作的启示

Estimating Wolf Population Size and Dynamics by Field Monitoring and Demographic Models: Implications for Management and Conservation.

作者信息

Merli Enrico, Mattioli Luca, Bassi Elena, Bongi Paolo, Berzi Duccio, Ciuti Francesca, Luccarini Siriano, Morimando Federico, Viviani Viviana, Caniglia Romolo, Galaverni Marco, Fabbri Elena, Scandura Massimo, Apollonio Marco

机构信息

Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy.

Wildlife Service, Tuscany Region, 50127 Florence, Italy.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2023 May 24;13(11):1735. doi: 10.3390/ani13111735.

DOI:10.3390/ani13111735
PMID:37889658
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10252110/
Abstract

We estimated the current size and dynamics of the wolf population in Tuscany and investigated the trends and demographic drivers of population changes. Estimates were obtained by two different approaches: (i) mixed-technique field monitoring (from 2014 to 2016) that found the minimum observed pack number and estimated population size, and (ii) an individual-based model (run by Vortex software v. 10.3.8.0) with demographic inputs derived from a local intensive study area and historic data on population size. Field monitoring showed a minimum population size of 558 wolves (SE = 12.005) in 2016, with a density of 2.74 individuals/100 km. The population model described an increasing trend with an average annual rate of increase λ = 1.075 (SE = 0.014), an estimated population size of about 882 individuals (SE = 9.397) in 2016, and a density of 4.29 wolves/100 km. Previously published estimates of wolf population were as low as 56.2% compared to our field monitoring estimation and 34.6% in comparison to our model estimation. We conducted sensitivity tests to analyze the key parameters driving population changes based on juvenile and adult mortality rates, female breeding success, and litter size. Mortality rates played a major role in determining intrinsic growth rate changes, with adult mortality accounting for 62.5% of the total variance explained by the four parameters. Juvenile mortality was responsible for 35.8% of the variance, while female breeding success and litter size had weak or negligible effects. We concluded that reliable estimates of population abundance and a deeper understanding of the role of different demographic parameters in determining population dynamics are crucial to define and carry out appropriate conservation and management strategies to address human-wildlife conflicts.

摘要

我们估算了托斯卡纳地区狼种群的当前规模和动态,并调查了种群变化的趋势及人口统计学驱动因素。估算通过两种不同方法得出:(i)混合技术野外监测(2014年至2016年),该方法得出了观察到的最小狼群数量并估算了种群规模;(ii)基于个体的模型(由Vortex软件v. 10.3.8.0运行),其人口统计学输入数据来自当地一个密集研究区域以及种群规模的历史数据。野外监测显示,2016年狼的最小种群规模为558只(标准误 = 12.005),密度为每100平方公里2.74只。种群模型描述了一种增长趋势,平均年增长率λ = 1.075(标准误 = 0.014),2016年估算的种群规模约为882只(标准误 = 9.397),密度为每100平方公里4.29只。与我们的野外监测估算相比,之前发表的狼种群估算值低至56.2%,与我们的模型估算相比则低至34.6%。我们进行了敏感性测试,以分析基于幼崽和成年死亡率、雌性繁殖成功率以及窝仔数驱动种群变化的关键参数。死亡率在决定内在增长率变化方面起主要作用,成年死亡率占四个参数解释的总方差的62.5%。幼崽死亡率占方差的35.8%,而雌性繁殖成功率和窝仔数的影响较弱或可忽略不计。我们得出结论,可靠的种群丰度估算以及对不同人口统计学参数在决定种群动态中所起作用的更深入理解,对于定义和实施适当的保护及管理策略以解决人兽冲突至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1ff/10252110/a997d94cad52/animals-13-01735-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1ff/10252110/64a3c4dd75f8/animals-13-01735-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1ff/10252110/7d3372daf95d/animals-13-01735-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1ff/10252110/7bdfec4950ba/animals-13-01735-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1ff/10252110/a997d94cad52/animals-13-01735-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1ff/10252110/64a3c4dd75f8/animals-13-01735-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1ff/10252110/7d3372daf95d/animals-13-01735-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1ff/10252110/7bdfec4950ba/animals-13-01735-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1ff/10252110/a997d94cad52/animals-13-01735-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Estimating Wolf Population Size and Dynamics by Field Monitoring and Demographic Models: Implications for Management and Conservation.通过野外监测和种群统计学模型估计狼的种群规模及动态变化:对管理和保护工作的启示
Animals (Basel). 2023 May 24;13(11):1735. doi: 10.3390/ani13111735.
2
Integrating basic and applied research to estimate carnivore abundance.整合基础研究与应用研究以估算食肉动物数量。
Ecol Appl. 2022 Dec;32(8):e2714. doi: 10.1002/eap.2714. Epub 2022 Oct 2.
3
Estimation of pack density in grey wolf () by applying spatially explicit capture-recapture models to camera trap data supported by genetic monitoring.通过将空间明确的捕获-再捕获模型应用于由基因监测支持的相机陷阱数据来估计灰狼()的种群密度。
Front Zool. 2018 Oct 3;15:38. doi: 10.1186/s12983-018-0281-x. eCollection 2018.
4
Can occupancy-abundance models be used to monitor wolf abundance?占有率-丰度模型可用于监测狼的数量吗?
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 23;9(7):e102982. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102982. eCollection 2014.
5
Non-invasive genetic monitoring involving citizen science enables reconstruction of current pack dynamics in a re-establishing wolf population.涉及公民科学的非侵入性基因监测能够重建正在重新建立的狼群当前的群体动态。
BMC Ecol. 2017 Dec 19;17(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12898-017-0154-8.
6
Camera Traps on Wildlife Crossing Structures as a Tool in Gray Wolf (Canis lupus) Management - Five-Years Monitoring of Wolf Abundance Trends in Croatia.野生动物通道结构上的相机陷阱作为灰狼(Canis lupus)管理工具——克罗地亚灰狼数量趋势的五年监测
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 21;11(6):e0156748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156748. eCollection 2016.
7
Social and demographic effects of anthropogenic mortality: a test of the compensatory mortality hypothesis in the red wolf.人为死亡率的社会和人口统计学影响:对红狼中补偿性死亡率假设的检验。
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20868. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020868. Epub 2011 Jun 23.
8
Estimating distribution and abundance of wide-ranging species with integrated spatial models: Opportunities revealed by the first wolf assessment in south-central Italy.利用综合空间模型估计广泛分布物种的分布和丰度:意大利中南部首次狼评估揭示的机遇
Ecol Evol. 2024 May 13;14(5):e11285. doi: 10.1002/ece3.11285. eCollection 2024 May.
9
A multidisciplinary approach to estimating wolf population size for long-term conservation.采用多学科方法估计狼群数量,以实现长期保护。
Conserv Biol. 2023 Dec;37(6):e14132. doi: 10.1111/cobi.14132. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
10
Ecosystem scale declines in elk recruitment and population growth with wolf colonization: a before-after-control-impact approach.狼的迁入导致生态系统尺度上麋鹿补充率和种群增长下降:一种前后对照影响研究方法
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 16;9(7):e102330. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102330. eCollection 2014.

本文引用的文献

1
Wolf Dispersal Patterns in the Italian Alps and Implications for Wildlife Diseases Spreading.意大利阿尔卑斯山的狼扩散模式及其对野生动物疾病传播的影响。
Animals (Basel). 2022 May 13;12(10):1260. doi: 10.3390/ani12101260.
2
An Integrated, Tentative Remote-Sensing Approach Based on NDVI Entropy to Model Canine Distemper Virus in Wildlife and to Prompt Science-Based Management Policies.一种基于归一化植被指数(NDVI)熵的综合、初步遥感方法,用于模拟野生动物中的犬瘟热病毒并推动基于科学的管理政策。
Animals (Basel). 2022 Apr 18;12(8):1049. doi: 10.3390/ani12081049.
3
Patterns and determinants of dispersal in grey wolves (Canis lupus).
灰狼(Canis lupus)的扩散模式与决定因素。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2022 Apr;97(2):466-480. doi: 10.1111/brv.12807. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
4
A critical appraisal of population viability analysis.种群生存力分析的批判性评价。
Conserv Biol. 2020 Feb;34(1):26-40. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13414. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
5
Estimation of pack density in grey wolf () by applying spatially explicit capture-recapture models to camera trap data supported by genetic monitoring.通过将空间明确的捕获-再捕获模型应用于由基因监测支持的相机陷阱数据来估计灰狼()的种群密度。
Front Zool. 2018 Oct 3;15:38. doi: 10.1186/s12983-018-0281-x. eCollection 2018.
6
Finding wolf homesites: improving the efficacy of howl surveys to study wolves.寻找狼的栖息地:提高嚎叫调查研究狼的效率。
PeerJ. 2018 Sep 28;6:e5629. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5629. eCollection 2018.
7
Co-Adaptation Is Key to Coexisting with Large Carnivores.共同适应是与大型食肉动物共存的关键。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2016 Aug;31(8):575-578. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2016.05.006. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
8
Decoding Group Vocalizations: The Acoustic Energy Distribution of Chorus Howls Is Useful to Determine Wolf Reproduction.解码群体发声:合唱嗥叫的声能分布有助于确定狼的繁殖情况。
PLoS One. 2016 May 4;11(5):e0153858. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153858. eCollection 2016.
9
Wolf Lethal Control and Livestock Depredations: Counter-Evidence from Respecified Models.狼的致命控制和牲畜侵害:重新指定模型的反证据。
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 11;11(2):e0148743. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148743. eCollection 2016.
10
Multimethod, multistate Bayesian hierarchical modeling approach for use in regional monitoring of wolves.用于狼的区域监测的多方法、多状态贝叶斯层次建模方法。
Conserv Biol. 2016 Aug;30(4):883-93. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12685. Epub 2016 May 4.