• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国健康研究人员对其数据密集型实践的环境影响的考虑及其与健康不平等的关系。

UK health researchers' considerations of the environmental impacts of their data-intensive practices and its relevance to health inequities.

机构信息

Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, King's College London, London, Strand, UK.

出版信息

BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Oct 27;24(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00973-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12910-023-00973-2
PMID:37891541
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10612270/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The health sector aims to improve health outcomes and access to healthcare. At the same time, the sector relies on unsustainable environmental practices that are increasingly recognised to be catastrophic threats to human health and health inequities. As such, a moral imperative exists for the sector to address these practices. While strides are currently underway to mitigate the environmental impacts of healthcare, less is known about how health researchers are addressing these issues, if at all.

METHODS

This paper uses an interview methodology to explore the attitudes of UK health researchers using data-intensive methodologies about the adverse environmental impacts of their practices, and how they view the importance of these considerations within wider health goals.

RESULTS

Interviews with 26 researchers showed that participants wanted to address the environmental and related health harms associated with their research and they reflected on how they could do so in alignment with their own research goals. However, when tensions emerged, their own research was prioritised. This was related to their own desires as researchers and driven by the broader socio-political context of their research endeavours.

CONCLUSION

To help mitigate the environmental and health harms associated with data-intensive health research, the socio-political context of research culture must be addressed.

摘要

背景

卫生部门旨在改善健康结果和获得医疗保健的机会。与此同时,该部门依赖于不可持续的环境实践,这些实践正日益被认为对人类健康和健康不平等构成灾难性威胁。因此,卫生部门有责任解决这些做法。虽然目前正在采取措施减轻医疗保健对环境的影响,但人们对健康研究人员是否在解决这些问题,以及如何解决这些问题知之甚少。

方法

本文使用访谈方法,探讨了英国使用数据密集型方法的健康研究人员对其实践的不利环境影响的态度,以及他们如何看待这些考虑因素在更广泛的健康目标中的重要性。

结果

对 26 名研究人员的访谈表明,参与者希望解决与其研究相关的环境和相关健康危害,并思考如何在符合自身研究目标的情况下解决这些问题。然而,当出现紧张局势时,他们自己的研究被优先考虑。这与他们作为研究人员的自身愿望有关,并受到他们研究工作的更广泛社会政治背景的驱动。

结论

为了帮助减轻与数据密集型健康研究相关的环境和健康危害,必须解决研究文化的社会政治背景。

相似文献

1
UK health researchers' considerations of the environmental impacts of their data-intensive practices and its relevance to health inequities.英国健康研究人员对其数据密集型实践的环境影响的考虑及其与健康不平等的关系。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Oct 27;24(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00973-2.
2
Responsibility for the Environmental Impact of Data-Intensive Research: An Exploration of UK Health Researchers.数据密集型研究的环境影响责任:对英国健康研究人员的探索。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2024 Jul 25;30(4):33. doi: 10.1007/s11948-024-00495-z.
3
Smart homes, private homes? An empirical study of technology researchers' perceptions of ethical issues in developing smart-home health technologies.智能家居,私人住宅?一项关于技术研究人员对开发智能家居健康技术中伦理问题认知的实证研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Apr 4;18(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0183-z.
4
Health researchers' attitudes towards public involvement in health research.健康研究人员对公众参与健康研究的态度。
Health Expect. 2009 Jun;12(2):209-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00532.x. Epub 2009 Apr 22.
5
Drivers and constraints to environmental sustainability in UK-based biobanking: balancing resource efficiency and future value.英国生物库中环境可持续性的驱动因素和制约因素:平衡资源效率和未来价值。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Jun 1;24(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00908-x.
6
Issues in methodological research: perspectives from researchers and commissioners.方法学研究中的问题:来自研究者和委托方的观点
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(8):1-57. doi: 10.3310/hta5080.
7
"About sixty per cent I want to do it": Health researchers' attitudes to, and experiences of, patient and public involvement (PPI)-A qualitative interview study.“约60%的人表示愿意参与”:健康领域研究人员对患者及公众参与(PPI)的态度与经历——一项定性访谈研究
Health Expect. 2019 Aug;22(4):721-730. doi: 10.1111/hex.12883. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
8
Twenty years since Ottawa and Epp: researchers' reflections on challenges, gains and future prospects for reducing health inequities in Canada.自渥太华会议和埃普报告发布二十年来:研究人员对加拿大减少健康不平等方面的挑战、成果及未来前景的反思
Health Promot Int. 2007 Dec;22(4):337-45. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dam031. Epub 2007 Oct 31.
9
The environmental impact of data-driven precision medicine initiatives.数据驱动的精准医学计划对环境的影响。
Camb Prism Precis Med. 2022 Sep 26;1:e1. doi: 10.1017/pcm.2022.1. eCollection 2023.
10
Biomedical Data Sharing and Reuse: Attitudes and Practices of Clinical and Scientific Research Staff.生物医学数据共享与再利用:临床与科研人员的态度及实践
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 24;10(6):e0129506. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129506. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Addressing environmental harms in the health sector: environmentality as a lens to expose (neglected) sites of knowledge/power.应对卫生部门中的环境危害:以环境性为视角揭示(被忽视的)知识/权力场所。
Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2025;12(1):963. doi: 10.1057/s41599-025-05307-8. Epub 2025 Jul 1.
2
UK Public Focus Groups on Healthcare's Environmental Impacts: A Critical Analysis of Co-Benefits Approaches.英国医疗保健环境影响公众焦点小组:对协同效益方法的批判性分析
Sociol Health Illn. 2025 Jun;47(5):e70058. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.70058.
3
Consideration of Sustainability When Approving Human Medical Research-A Scoping Review.批准人类医学研究时对可持续性的考量——一项范围综述
J Bioeth Inq. 2025 Mar;22(1):213-219. doi: 10.1007/s11673-024-10365-9. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
4
Understanding the financial aspects of digital pathology: A dynamic customizable return on investment calculator for informed decision-making.了解数字病理学的财务状况:一个用于明智决策的动态可定制投资回报率计算器。
J Pathol Inform. 2024 Apr 10;15:100376. doi: 10.1016/j.jpi.2024.100376. eCollection 2024 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Universities claim to value community-engaged scholarship: So why do they discourage it?大学声称重视社区参与型学术研究:那么它们为何又对此加以阻挠呢?
Public Underst Sci. 2023 Apr;32(3):304-321. doi: 10.1177/09636625221118779. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
2
Reimagining research ethics to include environmental sustainability: a principled approach, including a case study of data-driven health research.重新构想研究伦理,将环境可持续性纳入其中:一种有原则的方法,包括对数据驱动的健康研究的案例研究。
J Med Ethics. 2023 Jun;49(6):428-433. doi: 10.1136/jme-2022-108489. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
3
Analysis: the biodiversity footprint of the University of Oxford.分析:牛津大学的生物多样性足迹。
Nature. 2022 Apr;604(7906):420-424. doi: 10.1038/d41586-022-01034-1.
4
Climate crisis and ecological emergency: Why they concern (neuro)scientists, and what we can do.气候危机与生态紧急情况:它们为何关乎(神经)科学家,以及我们能做些什么。
Brain Neurosci Adv. 2022 Feb 28;6:23982128221075430. doi: 10.1177/23982128221075430. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
5
The Carbon Footprint of Bioinformatics.生物信息学的碳足迹。
Mol Biol Evol. 2022 Mar 2;39(3). doi: 10.1093/molbev/msac034.
6
The critical role of funders in shrinking the carbon footprint of research.资助者在减少研究碳足迹方面的关键作用。
Lancet Planet Health. 2022 Jan;6(1):e4-e6. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00276-X.
7
Reaching net zero carbon emissions in health systems.实现卫生系统的净零碳排放。
Lancet. 2021 Nov 27;398(10315):1953-1954. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02642-8. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
8
Plastic waste release caused by COVID-19 and its fate in the global ocean.新冠疫情引发的塑料垃圾排放及其在全球海洋中的归宿。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Nov 23;118(47). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2111530118.
9
The real climate and transformative impact of ICT: A critique of estimates, trends, and regulations.信息通信技术的实际气候与变革性影响:对估算、趋势及监管的批判
Patterns (N Y). 2021 Sep 10;2(9):100340. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2021.100340.
10
Ten simple rules to make your computing more environmentally sustainable.让你的计算更具环境可持续性的十条简单规则。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Sep 20;17(9):e1009324. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009324. eCollection 2021 Sep.