• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重复进行新冠病毒快速抗原检测对流行率边界性能和漏诊的影响

The Impact of Repeating COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Tests on Prevalence Boundary Performance and Missed Diagnoses.

作者信息

Kost Gerald J

机构信息

Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.

Point-of-Care Testing Center for Teaching and Research (POCT•CTR), Knowledge Optimization, Davis, CA 95616, USA.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Oct 16;13(20):3223. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13203223.

DOI:10.3390/diagnostics13203223
PMID:37892044
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10606553/
Abstract

A prevalence boundary (PB) marks the point in prevalence in which the false omission rate, R = FN/(TN + FN), exceeds the tolerance limit for missed diagnoses. The objectives were to mathematically analyze rapid antigen test (RAgT) performance, determine why PBs are breeched, and evaluate the merits of testing three times over five days, now required by the US Food and Drug Administration for asymptomatic persons. Equations were derived to compare test performance patterns, calculate PBs, and perform recursive computations. An independent July 2023 FDA-NIH-university-commercial evaluation of RAgTs provided performance data used in theoretical calculations. Tiered sensitivity/specificity comprise the following: tier (1) 90%, 95%; tier (2) 95%, 97.5%; and tier (3) 100%, ≥99%. Repeating a T2 test improves the PB from 44.6% to 95.2% (R 5%). In the FDA-NIH-university-commercial evaluation, RAgTs generated a sensitivity of 34.4%, which improved to 55.3% when repeated, and then improved to 68.5% with the third test. With R = 5%, PBs are 7.37/10.46/14.22%, respectively. PB analysis suggests that RAgTs should achieve a clinically proven sensitivity of 91.0-91.4%. When prevalence exceeds PBs, missed diagnoses can perpetuate virus transmission. Repeating low-sensitivity RAgTs delays diagnosis. In homes, high-risk settings, and hotspots, PB breaches may prolong contagion, defeat mitigation, facilitate new variants, and transform outbreaks into endemic disease. Molecular diagnostics can help avoid these potential vicious cycles.

摘要

流行率边界(PB)标志着流行率达到这样一个点,即假漏诊率R = FN/(TN + FN)超过漏诊诊断的容忍限度。目的是对快速抗原检测(RAgT)性能进行数学分析,确定PB被突破的原因,并评估美国食品药品监督管理局目前要求无症状者在五天内进行三次检测的优点。推导了方程以比较检测性能模式、计算PB并进行递归计算。2023年7月美国食品药品监督管理局、美国国立卫生研究院、大学和商业机构对RAgT进行的独立评估提供了用于理论计算的性能数据。分级灵敏度/特异性包括以下几种:第(1)级90%,95%;第(2)级95%,97.5%;第(3)级100%,≥99%。重复进行T2检测可将PB从44.6%提高到95.2%(R为5%)。在美国食品药品监督管理局、美国国立卫生研究院、大学和商业机构的评估中,RAgT的灵敏度为34.4%,重复检测时提高到55.3%,第三次检测时提高到68.5%。当R = 5%时,PB分别为7.37%/10.46%/14.22%。PB分析表明,RAgT应达到经临床验证的91.0 - 91.4%的灵敏度。当流行率超过PB时,漏诊诊断可能会使病毒传播持续下去。重复进行低灵敏度的RAgT会延迟诊断。在家庭、高风险场所和热点地区,PB被突破可能会延长传染期、破坏缓解措施、助长新变种出现并将疫情转变为地方病。分子诊断有助于避免这些潜在的恶性循环。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b958/10606553/acbedf910ba6/diagnostics-13-03223-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b958/10606553/9618273979ff/diagnostics-13-03223-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b958/10606553/8c8211dc05c9/diagnostics-13-03223-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b958/10606553/acbedf910ba6/diagnostics-13-03223-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b958/10606553/9618273979ff/diagnostics-13-03223-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b958/10606553/8c8211dc05c9/diagnostics-13-03223-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b958/10606553/acbedf910ba6/diagnostics-13-03223-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The Impact of Repeating COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Tests on Prevalence Boundary Performance and Missed Diagnoses.重复进行新冠病毒快速抗原检测对流行率边界性能和漏诊的影响
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Oct 16;13(20):3223. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13203223.
2
The Coronavirus Disease 2019 Spatial Care Path: Home, Community, and Emergency Diagnostic Portals.2019年冠状病毒病空间护理路径:家庭、社区和紧急诊断门户。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 May 12;12(5):1216. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12051216.
3
The Impact of Increasing Disease Prevalence, False Omissions, and Diagnostic Uncertainty on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Test Performance.不断增加的疾病流行率、假阴性漏报和诊断不确定性对 2019 冠状病毒病(COVID-19)检测性能的影响。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2021 Jul 1;145(7):797-813. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2020-0716-SA.
4
Diagnostic Strategies for Endemic Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).地方性 2019 冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的诊断策略。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2022 Jan 1;146(1):16-25. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2021-0386-SA.
5
Designing and Interpreting Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Diagnostics: Mathematics, Visual Logistics, and Low Prevalence.设计和解读 2019 冠状病毒病(COVID-19)诊断学:数学、可视化物流和低流行率。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2021 Mar 1;145(3):291-307. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2020-0443-SA.
6
[Evaluation of the Diagnostic Performance of SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Tests in COVID-19 Patients].[评估新冠病毒快速抗原检测在新冠肺炎患者中的诊断性能]
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2022 Apr;56(2):251-262. doi: 10.5578/mb.20229805.
7
Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断的快速、即时抗原检测。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 22;7(7):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub3.
8
Performance of an Antigen-Based Test for Asymptomatic and Symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Testing at Two University Campuses - Wisconsin, September-October 2020.基于抗原的无症状和有症状 SARS-CoV-2 检测在两个大学校园的表现 - 威斯康星州,2020 年 9 月至 10 月。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Jan 1;69(5152):1642-1647. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm695152a3.
9
Evaluation of Abbott BinaxNOW Rapid Antigen Test for SARS-CoV-2 Infection at Two Community-Based Testing Sites - Pima County, Arizona, November 3-17, 2020.亚利桑那州皮马县 2020 年 11 月 3 日至 17 日在两个社区检测点评估 Abbott BinaxNOW 快速抗原检测对 SARS-CoV-2 感染的效果。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Jan 22;70(3):100-105. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7003e3.
10
Agreement between diagnostic methods for SARS-CoV-2 infection in children seen at the Emergency Department of a children's hospital.儿童急诊科就诊儿童的 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断方法的一致性。
Arch Argent Pediatr. 2022 Oct;120(5):325-331. doi: 10.5546/aap.2022.eng.325. Epub 2022 Aug 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Geospatial Point-of-Care Testing Strategies for COVID-19 Resilience in Resource-Poor Settings: Rural Cambodia Field Study.面向资源匮乏环境下 COVID-19 韧性的地理空间即时检测策略:柬埔寨农村实地研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Aug 27;10:e47416. doi: 10.2196/47416.

本文引用的文献

1
Diagnostic accuracy of Panbio™ rapid antigen test for SARS-CoV-2 in paediatric population.Panbio™ 快速抗原检测试剂盒用于儿童人群中 SARS-CoV-2 的诊断准确性。
BMC Pediatr. 2023 Aug 29;23(1):433. doi: 10.1186/s12887-023-04201-z.
2
Antigen concentration, viral load, and test performance for SARS-CoV-2 in multiple specimen types.多种标本类型中 SARS-CoV-2 的抗原浓度、病毒载量和检测性能。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 19;18(7):e0287814. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287814. eCollection 2023.
3
Performance of Rapid Antigen Tests to Detect Symptomatic and Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection : A Prospective Cohort Study.
快速抗原检测对有症状和无症状 SARS-CoV-2 感染的检测性能:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2023 Jul;176(7):975-982. doi: 10.7326/M23-0385. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
4
Comparing SARS-CoV-2 testing positivity rates and COVID-19 impact among different isolation strategies: a rapid systematic review and a modelling study.比较不同隔离策略下的新冠病毒检测阳性率及新冠疫情影响:一项快速系统综述与建模研究
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Jul;61:102058. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102058. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
5
Daily SARS-CoV-2 Nasal Antigen Tests Miss Infected and Presumably Infectious People Due to Viral Load Differences among Specimen Types.由于标本类型中病毒载量的差异,每日 SARS-CoV-2 鼻拭子抗原检测会漏检感染和可能具有传染性的人群。
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Aug 17;11(4):e0129523. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01295-23. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
6
Design and implementation of a digital site-less clinical study of serial rapid antigen testing to identify asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection.用于识别无症状SARS-CoV-2感染的系列快速抗原检测数字无现场临床研究的设计与实施
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 May 10;7(1):e120. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.540. eCollection 2023.
7
Rapid antigen-based and rapid molecular tests for the detection of SARS-CoV-2: a rapid review with network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.基于抗原的快速检测和快速分子检测用于 SARS-CoV-2 的检测:一项针对诊断检测准确性研究的快速综述与网络荟萃分析。
BMC Med. 2023 Mar 29;21(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-02810-0.
8
Development of loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assays using five primers reduces the false-positive rate in COVID-19 diagnosis.开发使用五条引物的环介导等温扩增 (LAMP) 检测方法可降低 COVID-19 诊断中的假阳性率。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 28;13(1):5066. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31760-z.
9
A comparison of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen testing with realtime RT-PCR among symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals.SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测与有症状和无症状个体实时 RT-PCR 的比较。
BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Feb 9;23(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07969-0.
10
The Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines on the Diagnosis of COVID-19: Antigen Testing (January 2023).美国传染病学会关于 COVID-19 诊断的指南:抗原检测(2023 年 1 月)。
Clin Infect Dis. 2024 Jun 27;78(7):e350-e384. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad032.