• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工智能预测模型的五个关键质量标准。

Five critical quality criteria for artificial intelligence-based prediction models.

机构信息

Department of General Practice & Nursing Science, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 2023 Dec 7;44(46):4831-4834. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad727.

DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad727
PMID:37897346
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10702458/
Abstract

To raise the quality of clinical artificial intelligence (AI) prediction modelling studies in the cardiovascular health domain and thereby improve their impact and relevancy, the editors for digital health, innovation, and quality standards of the European Heart Journal propose five minimal quality criteria for AI-based prediction model development and validation studies: complete reporting, carefully defined intended use of the model, rigorous validation, large enough sample size, and openness of code and software.

摘要

为提高心血管健康领域临床人工智能 (AI) 预测模型研究的质量,从而提高其影响力和相关性,《欧洲心脏杂志》数字健康、创新和质量标准编辑提出了五项基于 AI 的预测模型开发和验证研究的最低质量标准:完整报告、仔细定义模型的预期用途、严格验证、足够大的样本量以及代码和软件的开放性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72f3/10702458/9225fe12ab6a/ehad727_ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72f3/10702458/9225fe12ab6a/ehad727_ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72f3/10702458/9225fe12ab6a/ehad727_ga1.jpg

相似文献

1
Five critical quality criteria for artificial intelligence-based prediction models.人工智能预测模型的五个关键质量标准。
Eur Heart J. 2023 Dec 7;44(46):4831-4834. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad727.
2
Critical appraisal of artificial intelligence-based prediction models for cardiovascular disease.人工智能在心血管疾病预测模型中的应用评价。
Eur Heart J. 2022 Aug 14;43(31):2921-2930. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac238.
3
Artificial intelligence, big data and heart transplantation: Actualities.人工智能、大数据与心脏移植:现状
Int J Med Inform. 2023 Aug;176:105110. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105110. Epub 2023 May 25.
4
Integrating Artificial and Human Intelligence: A Partnership for Responsible Innovation in Biomedical Engineering and Medicine.人工智能与人类智能的融合:生物医学工程和医学领域负责任创新的合作伙伴关系。
OMICS. 2020 May;24(5):247-263. doi: 10.1089/omi.2019.0038. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
5
Assessment of Radiology Artificial Intelligence Software: A Validation and Evaluation Framework.放射学人工智能软件评估:一个验证与评估框架。
Can Assoc Radiol J. 2023 May;74(2):326-333. doi: 10.1177/08465371221135760. Epub 2022 Nov 6.
6
Evaluation of Risk of Bias in Neuroimaging-Based Artificial Intelligence Models for Psychiatric Diagnosis: A Systematic Review.基于神经影像学的人工智能模型在精神疾病诊断中的偏倚风险评估:系统综述。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e231671. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.1671.
7
A Hybrid Stacked CNN and Residual Feedback GMDH-LSTM Deep Learning Model for Stroke Prediction Applied on Mobile AI Smart Hospital Platform.基于移动 AI 智能医院平台的应用,采用混合堆叠 CNN 和残差反馈 GMDH-LSTM 深度学习模型进行中风预测。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Mar 27;23(7):3500. doi: 10.3390/s23073500.
8
Development and evaluation of a live birth prediction model for evaluating human blastocysts from a retrospective study.从回顾性研究中评估人类囊胚的活产预测模型的开发和评估。
Elife. 2023 Feb 22;12:e83662. doi: 10.7554/eLife.83662.
9
Changes in software as a medical device based on artificial intelligence technologies.人工智能技术驱动的软件医疗器械的变化。
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2022 Oct;17(10):1969-1977. doi: 10.1007/s11548-022-02669-1. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
10
Artificial intelligence for prediction of treatment outcomes in breast cancer: Systematic review of design, reporting standards, and bias.人工智能在乳腺癌治疗效果预测中的应用:系统综述设计、报告标准和偏倚。
Cancer Treat Rev. 2022 Jul;108:102410. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2022.102410. Epub 2022 May 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Lines of Time: The Evolution of Glabellar Wrinkles over a Century.时间线:一个世纪以来眉间皱纹的演变
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Aug 25. doi: 10.1007/s00266-025-05131-0.
2
Generative artificial intelligence for general practice; new potential ahead, but are we ready?用于全科医疗的生成式人工智能:前景可期,但我们准备好了吗?
Eur J Gen Pract. 2025 Dec;31(1):2511645. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2025.2511645. Epub 2025 Jun 6.
3
State of the Art of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Electrophysiology in 2025: A Scientific Statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), and the ESC Working Group on E-Cardiology.

本文引用的文献

1
There is no such thing as a validated prediction model.没有经过验证的预测模型这种东西。
BMC Med. 2023 Feb 24;21(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-02779-w.
2
CODE-EHR best practice framework for the use of structured electronic healthcare records in clinical research.用于临床研究中使用结构化电子健康记录的 CODE-EHR 最佳实践框架。
Eur Heart J. 2022 Oct 7;43(37):3578-3588. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac426.
3
Critical appraisal of artificial intelligence-based prediction models for cardiovascular disease.人工智能在心血管疾病预测模型中的应用评价。
2025年临床心脏电生理学人工智能发展现状:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)旗下欧洲心律协会(EHRA)、心律学会(HRS)及ESC电子心脏病学工作组的科学声明
Europace. 2025 May 7;27(5). doi: 10.1093/europace/euaf071.
4
The Heart of Transformation: Exploring Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Disease.变革的核心:探索心血管疾病中的人工智能
Biomedicines. 2025 Feb 10;13(2):427. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13020427.
5
AI for IMPACTS Framework for Evaluating the Long-Term Real-World Impacts of AI-Powered Clinician Tools: Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.用于评估人工智能驱动的临床医生工具长期现实世界影响的AI for IMPACTS框架:系统评价与叙述性综合分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 5;27:e67485. doi: 10.2196/67485.
6
Prediction of cardiovascular markers and diseases using retinal fundus images and deep learning: a systematic scoping review.利用视网膜眼底图像和深度学习预测心血管标志物及疾病:一项系统性综述
Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2024 Sep 10;5(6):660-669. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztae068. eCollection 2024 Nov.
7
Prediction of sudden cardiac death using artificial intelligence: Current status and future directions.使用人工智能预测心源性猝死:现状与未来方向。
Heart Rhythm. 2025 Mar;22(3):756-766. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.09.003. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
8
Prediction of incident atrial fibrillation using deep learning, clinical models, and polygenic scores.使用深度学习、临床模型和多基因评分预测房颤发病情况。
Eur Heart J. 2024 Dec 7;45(46):4920-4934. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae595.
9
Identification of avoidable patients at triage in a Paediatric Emergency Department: a decision support system using predictive analytics.在儿科急诊分诊中识别可避免的患者:使用预测分析的决策支持系统。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Aug 18;24(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01029-3.
10
Unveiling the black box: imperative for explainable AI in cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention-author reply.揭开黑匣子:心血管疾病(CVD)预防中可解释人工智能的必要性——作者回复
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2024 Jul 11;48:101146. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101146. eCollection 2024 Jul.
Eur Heart J. 2022 Aug 14;43(31):2921-2930. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac238.
4
Generalizability of Cardiovascular Disease Clinical Prediction Models: 158 Independent External Validations of 104 Unique Models.心血管疾病临床预测模型的可推广性:104 个独特模型的 158 个独立外部验证。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2022 Apr;15(4):e008487. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.121.008487. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
5
Do Prediction Models Do More Harm Than Good?预测模型是否弊大于利?
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2022 Apr;15(4):e008667. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.122.008667. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
6
The year in cardiovascular medicine 2021: digital health and innovation.2021 年心血管医学年度报告:数字健康与创新。
Eur Heart J. 2022 Jan 31;43(4):271-279. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab874.
7
Artificial intelligence and cardiology: Current status and perspective.人工智能与心脏病学:现状与展望。
J Cardiol. 2022 Mar;79(3):326-333. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2021.11.017. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
8
Believing in black boxes: machine learning for healthcare does not need explainability to be evidence-based.相信黑盒:医疗保健的机器学习不需要可解释性即可成为基于证据的。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Feb;142:252-257. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.11.001. Epub 2021 Nov 5.
9
The false hope of current approaches to explainable artificial intelligence in health care.当前医疗保健中可解释人工智能方法的虚假希望。
Lancet Digit Health. 2021 Nov;3(11):e745-e750. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00208-9.
10
Risk of bias in studies on prediction models developed using supervised machine learning techniques: systematic review.基于监督机器学习技术开发的预测模型研究中的偏倚风险:系统评价。
BMJ. 2021 Oct 20;375:n2281. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2281.