Xu Yongkang, Fu Shumin, Liu Kan, Mao Ye, Wu Jianbing
Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, People's Republic of China.
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2023 Oct 24;19:853-863. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S420371. eCollection 2023.
To evaluate the clinical outcomes of lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitors (LP) and regorafenib (R) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after sorafenib failure.
From June 2018 to September 2021, 68 patients from a single center who received lenvatinib combined with PD-1 inhibitors or regorafenib after sorafenib treatment failure were analyzed. The tumor response and survival outcomes were compared between the LP group and R group. Prognostic factors for OS and PFS were determined using Cox proportional hazard regression models.
The ORR increased in the LP group (19.5% vs 7.4%, p =0.294), and the DCR was better in the R group (73.2% vs 44.4%, p =0.017). Additionally, median PFS and OS were not significantly different between the LP group and R two groups in survival analysis (PFS: 5.3 months vs 3.0 months, p =0.633; OS: 11.8 months vs 8.0 months, p =0.699). The common adverse events (≥grade 3) were hand-foot skin reactions (13.1%). In multivariate analyses, AFP≥400 ng/mL and ECOG PS 2 were independent risk factors for poor prognosis.
The LP group appeared to have a trend of greater tumor response and a higher disease control rate than the R group among patients with sorafenib-resistant HCC, although PFS and OS did not differ significantly between the two groups.
评估乐伐替尼联合PD - 1抑制剂(LP)和瑞戈非尼(R)用于索拉非尼治疗失败的晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的临床疗效。
对2018年6月至2021年9月间来自单一中心的68例索拉非尼治疗失败后接受乐伐替尼联合PD - 1抑制剂或瑞戈非尼治疗的患者进行分析。比较LP组和R组的肿瘤反应及生存结局。采用Cox比例风险回归模型确定总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)的预后因素。
LP组的客观缓解率(ORR)有所升高(19.5%对7.4%,p = 0.294),R组的疾病控制率(DCR)更高(73.2%对44.4%,p = 0.017)。此外,生存分析中LP组和R组的中位PFS和OS无显著差异(PFS:5.3个月对3.0个月,p = 0.633;OS:11.8个月对8.0个月,p = 0.699)。常见的≥3级不良事件为手足皮肤反应(13.1%)。多因素分析中,甲胎蛋白(AFP)≥400 ng/mL和东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)体能状态评分为2是预后不良的独立危险因素。
在索拉非尼耐药的HCC患者中,LP组似乎比R组有更高的肿瘤反应趋势和疾病控制率,尽管两组之间的PFS和OS无显著差异。