• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神病早期干预服务:寻求介入障碍和促进因素的系统评价和叙述性综合。

Early intervention in psychosis services: A systematic review and narrative synthesis of barriers and facilitators to seeking access.

机构信息

1School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

2Psychology Department, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.

出版信息

Eur Psychiatry. 2023 Nov 6;66(1):e92. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.2465.

DOI:10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.2465
PMID:37929296
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10755576/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) continues to be a global priority. Early intervention services were established to reduce treatment delays but have had limited impact. This systematic review examines barriers and facilitators to seeking access to these services, to identify targets for service level change.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of relevant databases (PsychINFO, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PsychARTICLES) using pre-defined search terms for and Given the majority of qualitative studies, a thematic synthesis rather than meta-analysis was indicated.

RESULTS

The search yielded 10 studies. Mental health stigma and discrimination predict DUP, compounded by structural barriers which limit the impact of early intervention services on timely access to recommended treatments. Synthesis of the qualitative studies generated three themes: , and Lack of knowledge, absence of supportive relationships (social and professional), and self-stigma constitute significant barriers to seeking access to early intervention services.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first review of the barriers and facilitators to seeking access to early intervention services. The findings highlight public health and secondary care service targets to expedite access to recommended treatments and thereby reduce the DUP.

摘要

背景

未治疗的精神病期(DUP)持续是全球的重点。早期干预服务的设立是为了减少治疗延误,但效果有限。本系统评价检查了寻求获得这些服务的障碍和促进因素,以确定服务水平变化的目标。

方法

我们使用预先定义的搜索词,对相关数据库(PsychINFO、MEDLINE、CINAHL 和 PsychARTICLES)进行了系统评价,由于大多数定性研究表明,需要进行主题综合分析而不是 meta 分析。

结果

搜索结果产生了 10 项研究。心理健康污名和歧视预测 DUP,加上结构障碍限制了早期干预服务对及时获得推荐治疗的影响。对定性研究的综合分析产生了三个主题:对精神疾病的误解和恐惧、服务获取的障碍、缺乏知识、缺乏支持性关系(社会和专业)和自我污名是寻求获得早期干预服务的重大障碍。

结论

这是首次对寻求获得早期干预服务的障碍和促进因素进行的评价。研究结果突出了公共卫生和二级保健服务的目标,以加快获得推荐的治疗,从而减少 DUP。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a63/10755576/34959ca18d96/S0924933823024653_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a63/10755576/dc7ca3614b3f/S0924933823024653_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a63/10755576/34959ca18d96/S0924933823024653_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a63/10755576/dc7ca3614b3f/S0924933823024653_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a63/10755576/34959ca18d96/S0924933823024653_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Early intervention in psychosis services: A systematic review and narrative synthesis of barriers and facilitators to seeking access.精神病早期干预服务:寻求介入障碍和促进因素的系统评价和叙述性综合。
Eur Psychiatry. 2023 Nov 6;66(1):e92. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.2465.
2
Mental health-related stigma and pathways to care for people at risk of psychotic disorders or experiencing first-episode psychosis: a systematic review.精神健康相关污名与精神病高危人群或首发精神病患者的治疗途径:系统综述。
Psychol Med. 2017 Aug;47(11):1867-1879. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717000344. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
3
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
4
Barriers and facilitators to access mental health services among refugee women in high-income countries: a systematic review.高收入国家难民女性获得心理健康服务的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 6;11(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-01936-1.
5
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
6
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
7
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
8
Barriers and facilitators to implementation of evidence-based task-sharing mental health interventions in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review using implementation science frameworks.在中低收入国家实施基于证据的任务分担精神卫生干预措施的障碍和促进因素:使用实施科学框架的系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2022 Jan 12;17(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01179-z.
9
Early Intervention in Psychosis services: A systematic review and narrative synthesis of the barriers and facilitators to implementation.精神病早期干预服务:实施障碍和促进因素的系统评价和叙述性综合。
Eur Psychiatry. 2021 Dec 16;65(1):e2. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.2260.
10
Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.影响重症成人和儿童机械通气撤机方案使用的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 4;10(10):CD011812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011812.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of COVID-19 on emergency department visits for individuals with psychotic disorders in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada: A longitudinal study.COVID-19对加拿大纽芬兰与拉布拉多省精神病患者急诊科就诊情况的影响:一项纵向研究。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Aug 7;5(8):e0004836. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004836. eCollection 2025.
2
Psychiatric antecedents in young patients with first episode psychosis: what relevance for clinical outcomes?首发精神病的年轻患者的精神病史:对临床结局有何关联?
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2025 Feb 28. doi: 10.1007/s00406-025-01981-6.
3
Barriers and facilitators to engagement in psychological therapy in first episode psychosis: A meta-ethnography and qualitative comparative analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Early Intervention in Psychosis services: A systematic review and narrative synthesis of the barriers and facilitators to implementation.精神病早期干预服务:实施障碍和促进因素的系统评价和叙述性综合。
Eur Psychiatry. 2021 Dec 16;65(1):e2. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.2260.
2
Lessons from an aborted controlled trial on the impact of befriending in an early intervention in psychosis population.从一项关于在精神病早期干预中友伴关系影响的中止对照试验中吸取的教训。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2022 Apr;16(4):453-455. doi: 10.1111/eip.13190. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
3
Males and Mental Health Stigma.
首发精神病患者参与心理治疗的障碍与促进因素:一项元民族志和定性比较分析
Psychol Psychother. 2025 Jun;98(2):232-255. doi: 10.1111/papt.12576. Epub 2025 Feb 3.
4
Early intervention in eating disorders: introducing the chronopathogram.饮食失调的早期干预:引入时间病理图。
Eat Weight Disord. 2025 Jan 23;30(1):9. doi: 10.1007/s40519-025-01715-6.
男性与心理健康污名化。
Am J Mens Health. 2020 Jul-Aug;14(4):1557988320949322. doi: 10.1177/1557988320949322.
4
Engagement in specialized early intervention services for psychosis as an interplay between personal agency and critical structures: A qualitative study.参与精神病的专业化早期干预服务:个人能动性与关键结构的相互作用:一项定性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Aug;108:103583. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103583. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
5
Improving access to services for psychotic patients: does implementing a waiting time target make a difference.改善精神病患者的服务获取:实施等待时间目标是否有影响。
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Jul;21(5):703-716. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01165-0. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
6
Is adult attachment associated with engagement with services? A systematic literature review.成人依恋与服务参与度有关联吗?一项系统的文献综述。
J Ment Health. 2021 Oct;30(5):607-618. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2019.1608922. Epub 2019 May 14.
7
Service users' and carers' experiences of engaging with early intervention services: A meta-synthesis review.服务使用者和照顾者参与早期干预服务的体验:元综合综述。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2020 Feb;14(1):26-36. doi: 10.1111/eip.12803. Epub 2019 Mar 26.
8
Reflexivity in Qualitative Research.质化研究中的反身性。
J Hum Lact. 2019 May;35(2):220-222. doi: 10.1177/0890334419830990. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
9
Stigma and access to care in first-episode psychosis.首发精神病患者的污名化与获得治疗机会。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2019 Oct;13(5):1208-1213. doi: 10.1111/eip.12756. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
10
Survey of the European Psychiatric Association on the European status and perspectives in early detection and intervention in at-risk mental state and first-episode psychosis.欧洲精神病学协会关于欧洲在高危精神状态和首发精神病的早期检测和干预方面的现状和展望的调查。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2019 Aug;13(4):853-858. doi: 10.1111/eip.12682. Epub 2018 Jun 8.