• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改善精神病患者的服务获取:实施等待时间目标是否有影响。

Improving access to services for psychotic patients: does implementing a waiting time target make a difference.

机构信息

Department of Health Care Management, Technical University of Berlin, Strasse des 17. Juni 135, 10623, Berlin, Germany.

Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Alcuin College, York, YO105DD, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Jul;21(5):703-716. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01165-0. Epub 2020 Feb 25.

DOI:10.1007/s10198-020-01165-0
PMID:32100156
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7366592/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In April 2015, the English National Health Service started implementing the first waiting time targets in mental health care. This study aims to investigate the effect of the 14-day waiting time target for early intervention in psychosis (EIP) services after the first six months of its implementation.

STUDY DESIGN

We analyse a cohort of first-episode psychosis patients from the English administrative Mental Health and Learning Disabilities Dataset 2011 to 2015. We compare patients being treated by EIP services (treatment) with those receiving care from standard community mental health services (control). We combine non-parametric matching with a difference-in-difference approach to account for observed and unobserved group differences. We analyse the probability of waiting below target and look at different percentiles of the waiting time distribution.

RESULTS

EIP patients had an 11.6-18.4 percentage point higher chance of waiting below target post-policy compared to standard care patients. However, post-policy trends at different percentiles of the waiting time distribution were not different between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Mental health providers seem to respond to waiting time targets in a similar way as physical health providers. The increased proportion waiting below target did not, however, result in an overall improvement across the waiting time distribution.

摘要

目的

2015 年 4 月,英国国民保健署开始实施精神卫生保健领域的首个等待时间目标。本研究旨在调查在实施早期精神病干预(EIP)服务 14 天等待时间目标后的头六个月的效果。

研究设计

我们分析了 2011 年至 2015 年英国行政心理健康和学习障碍数据集的首发精神病患者队列。我们将接受 EIP 服务治疗的患者(治疗组)与接受标准社区心理健康服务治疗的患者(对照组)进行比较。我们结合非参数匹配和差异中的差异方法来考虑观察到的和未观察到的组间差异。我们分析了低于目标的等待概率,并研究了等待时间分布的不同百分位数。

结果

与标准护理患者相比,EIP 患者在政策后等待时间低于目标的可能性高 11.6-18.4 个百分点。然而,在等待时间分布的不同百分位数上,两组之间的政策后趋势没有差异。

结论

精神卫生服务提供者似乎以与身体保健服务提供者类似的方式对等待时间目标做出反应。然而,等待时间低于目标的比例增加并没有导致整个等待时间分布的总体改善。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb98/7366592/3a5c67019cc8/10198_2020_1165_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb98/7366592/9a35823d617a/10198_2020_1165_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb98/7366592/c6d564347d1a/10198_2020_1165_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb98/7366592/3a5c67019cc8/10198_2020_1165_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb98/7366592/9a35823d617a/10198_2020_1165_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb98/7366592/c6d564347d1a/10198_2020_1165_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb98/7366592/3a5c67019cc8/10198_2020_1165_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Improving access to services for psychotic patients: does implementing a waiting time target make a difference.改善精神病患者的服务获取:实施等待时间目标是否有影响。
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Jul;21(5):703-716. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01165-0. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
2
Implementing the access and waiting time standard for early intervention in psychosis in the United Kingdom: An evaluation of referrals and post-assessment outcomes over the first year of operation.在英国实施精神病早期干预的就诊及等待时间标准:对运营第一年转诊及评估后结果的评估
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2018 Oct;12(5):979-986. doi: 10.1111/eip.12548. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
3
Economic impact of early intervention in psychosis services: results from a longitudinal retrospective controlled study in England.早期干预精神病服务的经济影响:来自英国一项纵向回顾性对照研究的结果。
BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 20;6(10):e012611. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012611.
4
The impact of waiting time on patient outcomes: Evidence from early intervention in psychosis services in England.等待时间对患者结局的影响:来自英格兰精神病早期干预服务的证据。
Health Econ. 2018 Nov;27(11):1772-1787. doi: 10.1002/hec.3800. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
5
Waiting time variation in Early Intervention Psychosis services: longitudinal evidence from the SEPEA naturalistic cohort study.早期干预精神病服务中的等待时间差异:来自SEPEA自然队列研究的纵向证据。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2017 May;52(5):563-574. doi: 10.1007/s00127-017-1343-7. Epub 2017 Feb 18.
6
Using epidemiological evidence to forecast population need for early treatment programmes in mental health: a generalisable Bayesian prediction methodology applied to and validated for first-episode psychosis in England.利用流行病学证据预测心理健康早期治疗计划的人口需求:一种可推广的贝叶斯预测方法,应用于并验证了英格兰的首发精神病。
Br J Psychiatry. 2021 Jul;219(1):383-391. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2021.18. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
7
Disparities in Access to Early Psychosis Intervention Services: Comparison of Service Users and Nonusers in Health Administrative Data.早期精神病干预服务获取方面的差异:健康管理数据中服务使用者与非使用者的比较。
Can J Psychiatry. 2018 Jun;63(6):395-403. doi: 10.1177/0706743718762101. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
8
A contingency management intervention to reduce cannabis use and time to relapse in early psychosis: the CIRCLE RCT.一项旨在减少早期精神病患者大麻使用和复发时间的权变管理干预措施:CIRCLE RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Aug;23(45):1-108. doi: 10.3310/hta23450.
9
Socioeconomic inequalities in duration of untreated psychosis: evidence from administrative data in England.社会经济地位对未治疗精神病持续时间的不平等影响:来自英国行政数据的证据。
Psychol Med. 2018 Apr;48(5):822-833. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717002197. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
10
An exploration of what service users value about early intervention in psychosis services.对服务使用者认为精神病早期干预服务有价值之处的探索。
Psychol Psychother. 2015 Dec;88(4):468-80. doi: 10.1111/papt.12051. Epub 2015 Jan 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Associations between rural/urban status, duration of untreated psychosis and mode of onset of psychosis: a mental health electronic clinical records analysis in the East of England, UK.农村/城市状况、未治疗精神病持续时间与精神病发病方式之间的关联:英国英格兰东部的一项心理健康电子临床记录分析
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2024 Sep 9. doi: 10.1007/s00127-024-02758-3.
2
Early intervention in psychosis services: A systematic review and narrative synthesis of barriers and facilitators to seeking access.精神病早期干预服务:寻求介入障碍和促进因素的系统评价和叙述性综合。
Eur Psychiatry. 2023 Nov 6;66(1):e92. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.2465.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Early intervention services are effective and must be defended.早期干预服务是有效的,必须加以维护。
World Psychiatry. 2017 Oct;16(3):272-274. doi: 10.1002/wps.20452.
2
Improving outcomes of first-episode psychosis: an overview.改善首发精神病的治疗效果:综述
World Psychiatry. 2017 Oct;16(3):251-265. doi: 10.1002/wps.20446.
3
Waiting time variation in Early Intervention Psychosis services: longitudinal evidence from the SEPEA naturalistic cohort study.早期干预精神病服务中的等待时间差异:来自SEPEA自然队列研究的纵向证据。
Sociodemographic and clinical predictors of delay to and length of stay with early intervention for psychosis service: findings from the CRIS-FEP study.
社会人口学和临床因素预测精神分裂症早期干预服务的延迟和住院时间:CRIS-FEP 研究结果。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2024 Jan;59(1):25-36. doi: 10.1007/s00127-023-02522-z. Epub 2023 Jun 23.
4
A Delphi study to explore clinician and lived experience perspectives on setting priorities in eating disorder services.德尔菲研究探索临床医生和患者生活体验在饮食障碍服务中的优先事项设定。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun 17;22(1):788. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08170-4.
5
Assessing implementation fidelity in the First Episode Rapid Early Intervention for Eating Disorders service model.评估饮食失调症首次发作快速早期干预服务模式中的实施保真度。
BJPsych Open. 2021 May 7;7(3):e98. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2021.51.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2017 May;52(5):563-574. doi: 10.1007/s00127-017-1343-7. Epub 2017 Feb 18.
4
Economic impact of early intervention in psychosis services: results from a longitudinal retrospective controlled study in England.早期干预精神病服务的经济影响:来自英国一项纵向回顾性对照研究的结果。
BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 20;6(10):e012611. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012611.
5
Fifteen years on - early intervention for a new generation.十五年过去了——为新一代提供早期干预。
Br J Psychiatry. 2016 Sep;209(3):186-8. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.115.170035.
6
Global economic burden of schizophrenia: a systematic review.精神分裂症的全球经济负担:一项系统综述。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016 Feb 16;12:357-73. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S96649. eCollection 2016.
7
Implementation and development of early intervention in psychosis services in Italy: a national survey promoted by the Associazione Italiana Interventi Precoci nelle Psicosi.意大利精神病早期干预服务的实施与发展:由意大利精神病早期干预协会推动的一项全国性调查。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;12(1):37-44. doi: 10.1111/eip.12277. Epub 2015 Sep 29.
8
Early intervention for psychosis: a Canadian perspective.精神病的早期干预:加拿大视角
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2015 May;203(5):356-64. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000288.
9
Why We Should Not Be Indifferent to Specification Choices for Difference-in-Differences.为何我们不应忽视双重差分法中的设定选择
Health Serv Res. 2015 Aug;50(4):1211-35. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12270. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
10
Duration of untreated psychosis as predictor of long-term outcome in schizophrenia: systematic review and meta-analysis.未治疗精神病持续时间对精神分裂症长期结局的预测作用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Psychiatry. 2014 Aug;205(2):88-94. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.113.127753. Epub 2014 Aug 1.