Johnson C A, Hansen W B, Collins L M, Graham J W
J Behav Med. 1986 Oct;9(5):439-52. doi: 10.1007/BF00845132.
This study compared two strategies for preventing cigarette smoking among high-school students. One strategy emphasized social-pressure resistance skills, while the other focused on education about health concerns which are relevant to high-school students. Additionally, the use of same-age peer leaders and the use of familiar models in media presentations were investigated. The results suggest that social-influences resistance training was efficacious in reducing transitions to higher use by those who had previously experimented with cigarettes. Health education was most effective in preventing initial experimentation among those who had not smoked prior to the beginning of the study. Neither program was effective in limiting transitions among those who had gone beyond the experimental stage of smoking, and neither had any effect on encouraging cessation. There were no differences which could be attributed to peer leaders or to familiar media models. During later adolescence, a combined health education and social skills training approach is advocated. It is suggested that while there are some gains by implementing programs during late adolescence, prevention programs targeted at younger students may be more effective generally.
本研究比较了两种预防高中生吸烟的策略。一种策略强调抗社会压力技能,另一种则侧重于与高中生相关的健康问题教育。此外,还研究了同龄同伴领袖的使用以及在媒体展示中使用熟悉榜样的情况。结果表明,社会影响抵抗训练对于减少那些之前曾尝试吸烟的人向更高吸烟频率转变是有效的。健康教育在预防研究开始前未吸烟的人初次尝试吸烟方面最为有效。两个项目对于限制那些已超过吸烟试验阶段的人的转变均无效,且对鼓励戒烟均无任何效果。在同龄同伴领袖或熟悉的媒体榜样方面没有可归因的差异。在青春期后期,提倡采用健康教育与社交技能训练相结合的方法。研究表明,虽然在青春期后期实施项目有一些成效,但总体而言,针对更年轻学生的预防项目可能更有效。