Department of Biology, Section for Evolutionary Ecology, Lund University, Ecology Building, SE-223 62 Lund, Sweden.
J Exp Biol. 2023 Dec 15;226(24). doi: 10.1242/jeb.246321. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
Several methods are routinely used to measure avian body temperature, but different methods vary in invasiveness. This may cause stress-induced increases in temperature and/or metabolic rate and, hence, overestimation of both parameters. Choosing an adequate temperature measurement method is therefore key to accurately characterizing an animal's thermal and metabolic phenotype. Using great tits (Parus major) and four common methods with different levels of invasiveness (intraperitoneal, cloacal, subcutaneous, cutaneous), we evaluated the preciseness of body temperature measurements and effects on resting metabolic rate (RMR) over a 40°C range of ambient temperatures. None of the methods caused overestimation or underestimation of RMR compared with un-instrumented birds, and body or skin temperature estimates did not differ between methods in thermoneutrality. However, skin temperature was lower compared with all other methods below thermoneutrality. These results provide empirical guidance for future research that aims to measure body temperature and metabolic rate in small bird models.
有几种常用的方法来测量鸟类的体温,但不同的方法在侵入性上有所不同。这可能导致由于应激引起的体温和/或代谢率升高,从而高估这两个参数。因此,选择合适的体温测量方法是准确描述动物热代谢表型的关键。本研究使用大山雀(Parus major)和四种不同侵入性水平的常见方法(腹腔内、泄殖腔、皮下、皮肤),评估了在 40°C 的环境温度范围内体温测量的精确性及其对静止代谢率(RMR)的影响。与未仪器化的鸟类相比,这些方法均未导致 RMR 的高估或低估,在热中性区,不同方法之间的体温或皮肤温度估计值也没有差异。然而,在热中性区以下,皮肤温度与所有其他方法相比都较低。这些结果为未来旨在测量小型鸟类模型体温和代谢率的研究提供了经验指导。