Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Sciences, University of Molise, via De Sanctis, I-86100 Campobasso, Italy.
Medical Research Council (MRC) Centre for Environment and Health, Environmental Research Group, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
J Hazard Mater. 2024 Feb 15;464:132991. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.132991. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
Literature about the occurrence of microplastic in biological tissues has increased over the last few years. This review aims to synthesis the evidence on the preparation of biological tissues, chemical identification of microplastic and accumulation in tissues. Several microplastic's extraction approaches from biological tissues emerged (i.e., alkaline, acids, oxidizing and enzymatic). However, criteria used for the selection of the extraction method have yet to be clarified. Similarly, analytical methodologies for chemical identification often does not align with the size of particles. Furthermore, sizes of microplastics found in biological tissues are likely to be biologically implausible, due to the size of the biological barriers. From this review, it emerged that further assessment are required to determine whether microplastic particles were truly internalized, were in the vasculature serving these organs, or were an artefact of the methodological process. The importance of a standardisation of quality control/quality assurance emerged. Findings arose from this review could have a broad implication, and could be used as a basis for further investigations, to reduce artifact results and clearly assess the fate of microplastics in biological tissues.
近年来,有关生物组织中微塑料出现的文献有所增加。本综述旨在综合有关生物组织中微塑料的制备、化学鉴定和积累的证据。已经出现了几种从生物组织中提取微塑料的方法(例如,碱性、酸性、氧化和酶)。然而,用于选择提取方法的标准尚待澄清。同样,用于化学鉴定的分析方法通常与颗粒的大小不一致。此外,由于生物屏障的大小,在生物组织中发现的微塑料的大小可能在生物学上是不合理的。从本综述中可以看出,需要进一步评估,以确定微塑料颗粒是否真的被内吞,是否存在于为这些器官提供服务的脉管系统中,或者是否是方法学过程的人为产物。需要对质量控制/质量保证进行标准化。本综述产生的结果可能具有广泛的影响,并可作为进一步研究的基础,以减少人为结果并清楚地评估微塑料在生物组织中的命运。