Suppr超能文献

在一家三级体重管理中心,对新冠疫情之前和期间使用抗肥胖药物的减肥效果进行比较。

A comparison between weight loss outcomes with anti-obesity medications before and during Covid-19 pandemic at a tertiary weight management center.

作者信息

De la Rosa Alan, Ghusn Wissam, Sacoto Daniel, Campos Alejandro, Cifuentes Lizeth, Feris Fauzi, Busebee Bradley, Calderon Gerardo, Acosta Andres, Hurtado Maria D

机构信息

Precision Medicine for Obesity Program, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism & Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.

出版信息

Obes Pillars. 2022 Dec 1;4:100046. doi: 10.1016/j.obpill.2022.100046. eCollection 2022 Dec.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

/Objectives: Obesity is a risk factor for COVID-19 infection severity and mortality. Anti-obesity medications (AOM) are effective for weight loss. However, weight loss outcomes with AOM during the COVID-19 pandemic are yet to be described.

SUBJECTS

/Methods: Between January 1, 2016, and June 30, 2021, a total of 966 patients were prescribed long-term FDA-approved AOMs at the Mayo Clinic. From these patients, 711 patients did not meet inclusion criteria. A total of 255 patients were included.

INTERVENTIONS/METHODS: We performed a retrospective systematic review of electronic medical records and included patients who started a long-term FDA-approved AOM. We excluded patients with history of bariatric procedure, AOM prescription with lorcaserin, orlistat, semaglutide (approved for weight loss after the pandemic), or phentermine (short-term AOM), those taking ≥2 AOMs, <3 months of prescribed AOM, and/or pregnancy. Analysis was divided by 1)preCOVID-19: those who started an AOM before COVID-19 restrictions, 2)COVID-19: those who started an AOM during first quarter of 2020 after the establishment of COVID-19 restrictions. Our primary endpoint was the total body weight loss percentage (%TBWL) at 3, 6, and 12 months after AOM initiation.

RESULTS

There was a statistical difference in TBWL% between the preCOVID-19 and COVID-19 group: 5.3 ± 3.5% vs 4 ± 3.0% (95% CI -2.4 to -0.2; p = 0.02) and 9.7 ± 7.2% vs 6.2 ± 4.7% (95% CI -5.7 to -1.3; p = 0.002) at 3 and 12 months, respectively. At 6 months, the TBWL% was 7.1 for the preCOVID-19 group compared to 6.2% for the COVID-19 (95% CI -2.5 to 0.7; p = 0.25).

CONCLUSION

With the possible exception of liraglutide, this study shows that weight loss outcomes to AOMs were inferior when prescribed during the routine clinical practice throughout COVID-19 pandemic, compared to the outcomes observed prior to the COVID-19 pandemic.

摘要

背景

/目的:肥胖是新冠病毒感染严重程度和死亡率的一个风险因素。抗肥胖药物(AOM)对减肥有效。然而,新冠疫情期间使用AOM的减肥效果尚未得到描述。

研究对象

/方法:在2016年1月1日至2021年6月30日期间,梅奥诊所共有966名患者被开具了美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的长期AOM。在这些患者中,711名患者不符合纳入标准。共纳入255名患者。

干预措施/方法:我们对电子病历进行了回顾性系统评价,纳入开始使用FDA批准的长期AOM的患者。我们排除了有减肥手术史、使用氯卡色林、奥利司他、司美格鲁肽(疫情后批准用于减肥)或苯丁胺(短期AOM)进行AOM处方的患者,服用≥2种AOM的患者、AOM处方时间<3个月的患者和/或孕妇。分析分为两组:1)新冠疫情前:在新冠疫情限制措施实施前开始使用AOM的患者;2)新冠疫情期间:在2020年第一季度新冠疫情限制措施实施后开始使用AOM的患者。我们的主要终点是开始使用AOM后3个月、6个月和12个月时的总体重减轻百分比(%TBWL)。

结果

新冠疫情前组和新冠疫情期间组的%TBWL存在统计学差异:3个月时分别为5.3±3.5%和4±3.0%(95%CI -2.4至-0.2;p=0.02),12个月时分别为9.7±7.2%和6.2±4.7%(95%CI -5.7至-1.3;p=0.002)。6个月时,新冠疫情前组的%TBWL为7.1%,而新冠疫情期间组为6.2%(95%CI -2.5至0.7;p=0.25)。

结论

除利拉鲁肽外,本研究表明,与新冠疫情前观察到的结果相比,在整个新冠疫情期间的常规临床实践中开具AOM时,其减肥效果较差。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a366/10662055/68105d261b72/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验