Suppr超能文献

社会流动与心理健康:系统综述和荟萃分析。

Social mobility and mental health: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, 425 S. University Ave, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2024 Jan;340:116340. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116340. Epub 2023 Nov 15.

Abstract

Socioeconomic status (SES) is a robust correlate of mental health, and emerging research indicates that life course trajectories of SES (i.e., social mobility) may be more predictive for health outcomes than point-in-time SES assessments. This paper presents five primary meta-analyses to determine how mental health differs between social mobility groups. We conducted a systematic review of PsycINFO, Web of Science, and PubMed for studies of social mobility and mental health. We used random-effects multilevel meta-analyses to compare mental health problems between individuals who experienced upward mobility, downward mobility, stable high SES, and stable low SES. We included data from 21 studies and 157,763 unique participants yielding 105 effect sizes. Upwardly mobile participants experienced more mental health problems than stable high SES participants (d = 0.11), fewer mental health problems than stable low SES participants (d = -0.24), and fewer mental health problems than downwardly mobile participants (d = -0.17). Downwardly mobile individuals experienced more mental health problems than stable high SES participants (d = 0.26) and fewer mental health problems than stable low SES participants (d = -0.10). Subgroup analyses revealed that the magnitude of effects did not differ by continent of study, type of generational mobility (intergenerational vs. intragenerational), or SES indicator. Meta-regressions with continuous moderators (age, gender, race, study quality) were also non-significant. Taken together, these results indicate that both upwardly and downwardly mobile individuals experience more mental health problems than those who are persistently advantaged, and they both experience fewer mental health problems than those who are persistently disadvantaged. Our findings suggest that while current SES has a stronger association with adult mental health than childhood SES, it is important to also consider the impact of early life and prior generation SES to account for lingering effects of early disadvantage.

摘要

社会经济地位(SES)是心理健康的一个强有力的相关因素,新兴研究表明,SES 的生活轨迹(即社会流动)可能比 SES 的时点评估更能预测健康结果。本文提出了五个主要的元分析,以确定心理健康在社会流动群体之间的差异。我们对 PsycINFO、Web of Science 和 PubMed 进行了系统的文献回顾,以研究社会流动和心理健康。我们使用随机效应多层次元分析来比较经历向上流动、向下流动、稳定的高 SES 和稳定的低 SES 的个体之间的心理健康问题。我们纳入了 21 项研究和 157763 名独特参与者的数据,产生了 105 个效应量。向上流动的参与者比稳定的高 SES 参与者经历更多的心理健康问题(d=0.11),比稳定的低 SES 参与者经历更少的心理健康问题(d=-0.24),比向下流动的参与者经历更少的心理健康问题(d=-0.17)。向下流动的个体比稳定的高 SES 参与者经历更多的心理健康问题(d=0.26),比稳定的低 SES 参与者经历更少的心理健康问题(d=-0.10)。亚组分析表明,效应的大小不因研究所在的大陆、代际流动的类型(代际与同代)或 SES 指标而有所不同。带有连续调节变量(年龄、性别、种族、研究质量)的元回归也不显著。综上所述,这些结果表明,向上和向下流动的个体都比持续处于优势地位的个体经历更多的心理健康问题,他们都比持续处于劣势地位的个体经历更少的心理健康问题。我们的研究结果表明,虽然当前的 SES 与成人心理健康的关联比儿童时期的 SES 更强,但重要的是还要考虑早期生活和前一代 SES 的影响,以解释早期劣势的持久影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验