Richards Dylan K, Waddell Jack T
Center on Alcohol, Substance use, And Addictions (CASAA), University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Addict Res Theory. 2023;31(5):313-320. doi: 10.1080/16066359.2022.2161529. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
The aim of the present study was to conduct a preliminary investigation of the associations between facets of impulsivity and alcohol outcomes through motives for drinking responsibly described by self-determination theory among college students. Participants (N=2,808) were part of a multisite investigation of college student drinking across 10 universities in 8 states in the U.S. who reported past-month drinking. Results of a structural equation model testing all possible indirect associations simultaneously indicated that one-third (20 out of 60) of the indirect associations were statistically significant (<.01). Facets with higher scores representing higher impulsivity (negative/positive urgency) were negatively associated with more internalized motives (autonomous motivation and introjected regulation) and positively associated with less internalized motives (external regulation and amotivation) for drinking responsibly. Facets with higher scores representing lower impulsivity (perseverance and premeditation) demonstrated opposite patterns of associations with motives for drinking responsibly. In turn, more internalized motives were related to higher frequency of protective behavioral strategies use, lower alcohol use severity, and fewer negative alcohol-related consequences; less internalized motives demonstrated an opposite pattern of associations with these alcohol outcomes. The present findings should be replicated using experimental and longitudinal studies for appropriately testing mediation but offer support for a novel hypothesis for motivational pathways from impulsivity to alcohol outcomes that may provide insight into intervention targets.
本研究的目的是通过自我决定理论所描述的负责任饮酒动机,对冲动性各方面与酒精相关结果之间的关联进行初步调查。参与者(N = 2808)是美国8个州10所大学的大学生饮酒多地点调查的一部分,他们报告了过去一个月内饮酒情况。同时测试所有可能间接关联的结构方程模型结果表明,三分之一(60个中的20个)间接关联具有统计学意义(<.01)。代表较高冲动性(消极/积极紧迫性)的高分方面与更多内化动机(自主动机和内摄调节)呈负相关,与较少内化动机(外部调节和无动机)呈正相关,这些动机与负责任饮酒有关。代表较低冲动性(坚持性和预谋性)的高分方面与负责任饮酒动机呈现相反的关联模式。反过来,更多内化动机与更高频率的保护性行为策略使用、更低的酒精使用严重程度以及更少的与酒精相关的负面后果相关;较少内化动机与这些酒精相关结果呈现相反的关联模式。本研究结果应通过实验性和纵向研究进行重复验证,以适当检验中介作用,但为从冲动性到酒精相关结果的动机途径这一新假设提供了支持,这可能为干预目标提供见解。