Department of Family Medicine, Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Int J Public Health. 2023 Nov 14;68:1606453. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2023.1606453. eCollection 2023.
A tripartite public-private partnership was established between GPs' practices, public health authorities and a university department of family medicine, to develop multidisciplinary teams and integrate nurses into GPs' practices. The present paper describes the points of view of the GPs involved in this collaboration. We conducted a qualitative study, with data coming from eight interviews with GPs, one from each practice. We also used the facilitator's project diary to complete the discussion. The principal issue discussed was the financial aspects of the collaboration. GPs are generally satisfied, but time spent coordinating with nurses and transferring activities made them fear financial losses. Secondly, the partnership with public health authorities was well appreciated, but not clear enough. Some aspects of the partnership, such as referring patient to the nurse should have been better defined et controlled. The last aspect was the academic support. It allowed reducing GPs' workload in training nurses and supporting the project implementation within the GPs' practice. GPs have a positive point of view of such public-private partnership and saw an opportunity to be involved in developing public health policies.
三方公私合作伙伴关系在全科医生诊所、公共卫生当局和家庭医学系之间建立,以发展多学科团队并将护士纳入全科医生诊所。本文介绍了参与这一合作的全科医生的观点。我们进行了一项定性研究,数据来自对每家诊所的一位全科医生的八次访谈。我们还使用协调员的项目日记来完成讨论。讨论的主要问题是合作的财务方面。全科医生普遍满意,但与护士协调和转移活动所花费的时间使他们担心会出现财务损失。其次,与公共卫生当局的伙伴关系受到高度赞赏,但不够明确。伙伴关系的某些方面,如将患者转介给护士,本应得到更好的定义和控制。最后一个方面是学术支持。它允许减少全科医生在培训护士和支持护士在全科医生诊所内实施项目方面的工作量。全科医生对这种公私合作伙伴关系持积极态度,并认为这是参与制定公共卫生政策的一个机会。