• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Youtube 视频中关于性发育障碍信息的质量。

Quality of information in Youtube videos on disorder of sexual development.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Hatay Education and Research Hospital, Hatay, Turkey.

Department of Urology, Baskent University Adana Dr. Turgut Noyan Research and Medical Center, Adana, Turkey.

出版信息

Int J Impot Res. 2024 Nov;36(7):765-769. doi: 10.1038/s41443-023-00800-7. Epub 2023 Nov 30.

DOI:10.1038/s41443-023-00800-7
PMID:38036636
Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and quality of the videos published on YouTube on the subject of disorder of sexual development. The search was performed by using term 'disorder of sexual development', 'differences in sex development', 'variations in sex development' and 'intersex' on YouTube. Videos in languages other than English and whose sound or image quality was poor were excluded from the study. The videos were evaluated in terms of source, content, intended audience, commercial bias, and accuracy of information. Video features were recorded. Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) criteria, modified DISCERN scale and Global Quality Score (GQS) were used for quality evaluation. A total of 150 videos were evaluated. The source of 30% of the videos was medical education sites, the content of 43.3% was general information and the target audience of 40.6% was patients/society. Accuracy of information rate was 90% and commercial bias rate was 7.3%. The median JAMA, GQS and Modified DISCERN score were 1 (IQR value:2, range:0-2), 3 (IQR value:2, range:2-4) and 3 (IQR value:2, range:1-3) respectively. These scores were correlated with each other (rho = 0.834-0.909 p < 0.001). Scores of the videos whose source was academic journal/university were higher compared to other videos (p < 0.001). The median duration of the videos with good quality was longer (p < 0.001). A negative correlation was found between all scoring systems and number of views/likes/comments, view/comment per day and days since upload date (rho = -0.332, rho = -0.273, rho = -0.382, rho = -0.249, rho = -0.323 rho = -0.285 respectively; p < 0.05). YouTube is a good platform to learn about disorder of sexual development, but the quality may vary depending on the video source.

摘要

本研究旨在评估 YouTube 上有关性发育障碍主题的视频的准确性和质量。使用术语“性发育障碍”、“性别发育差异”、“性别发育变异”和“间性”在 YouTube 上进行了搜索。排除了非英语语言和声音或图像质量较差的视频。从来源、内容、目标受众、商业偏见和信息准确性等方面对视频进行了评估。记录了视频特征。使用《美国医学会杂志》(JAMA)标准、改良 DISCERN 量表和全球质量评分(GQS)进行质量评估。共评估了 150 个视频。30%的视频来源是医学教育网站,43.3%的内容是一般信息,40.6%的目标受众是患者/社会。信息准确率为 90%,商业偏见率为 7.3%。JAMA、GQS 和改良 DISCERN 评分中位数分别为 1(IQR 值:2,范围:0-2)、3(IQR 值:2,范围:2-4)和 3(IQR 值:2,范围:1-3)。这些评分相互相关(rho=0.834-0.909,p<0.001)。来源为学术期刊/大学的视频评分高于其他视频(p<0.001)。评分较高的视频质量较好,其视频时长也较长(p<0.001)。所有评分系统与观看次数/点赞数/评论数、每日观看次数/评论次数和上传日期后的天数之间均呈负相关(rho=-0.332,rho=-0.273,rho=-0.382,rho=-0.249,rho=-0.323,rho=-0.285;p<0.05)。YouTube 是了解性发育障碍的良好平台,但视频质量可能因视频来源而异。

相似文献

1
Quality of information in Youtube videos on disorder of sexual development.Youtube 视频中关于性发育障碍信息的质量。
Int J Impot Res. 2024 Nov;36(7):765-769. doi: 10.1038/s41443-023-00800-7. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
2
Analysis of videos about vesicoureteral reflux on YouTube.YouTube上关于膀胱输尿管反流的视频分析。
J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Dec;17(6):858.e1-858.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.10.006. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
3
YouTube as a source of information on fibromyalgia.YouTube 作为纤维肌痛信息来源。
Int J Rheum Dis. 2021 Feb;24(2):197-202. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.14043. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
4
A quality analysis of nocturnal enuresis videos on YouTube.YouTube 上遗尿症视频的质量分析。
J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Aug;17(4):449.e1-449.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.03.014. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
5
Quality of online video resources concerning patient education for neck pain: A YouTube-based quality-control study.基于 YouTube 的视频质量控制研究:在线视频资源在颈椎病患者教育中的质量。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 21;10:972348. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.972348. eCollection 2022.
6
The Quality of Short Videos as a Source of Coronary Heart Disease Information on TikTok: Cross-Sectional Study.短视频质量作为 TikTok 冠心病信息来源的研究:横断面研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Sep 3;8:e51513. doi: 10.2196/51513.
7
YouTube as a Source of Information for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Stroke: A Quality, Reliability and Accuracy Analysis.YouTube 作为脑卒中患者经颅磁刺激的信息来源:一项质量、可靠性和准确性分析。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Dec;29(12):105309. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105309. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
8
Quality Assessment of YouTube Videos as an Information Source for Testicular Torsion.YouTube 视频作为睾丸扭转信息来源的质量评估。
Front Public Health. 2022 May 18;10:905609. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.905609. eCollection 2022.
9
Quality analysis of testicular cancer videos on YouTube.YouTube 上睾丸癌视频的质量分析。
Andrologia. 2021 Sep;53(8):e14118. doi: 10.1111/and.14118. Epub 2021 May 19.
10
Quality of Online Video Resources Concerning Patient Education for the Meniscus: A YouTube-Based Quality-Control Study.基于 YouTube 的半月板患者教育在线视频资源质量控制研究:一项质量控制研究。
Arthroscopy. 2020 Jan;36(1):233-238. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.07.033.

引用本文的文献

1
YouTube as a source of information on retrograde ejaculation: insights into content reliability.YouTube作为逆行射精信息来源:对内容可靠性的见解
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Jul 2. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01124-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality Assessment of YouTube Videos as an Information Source for Testicular Torsion.YouTube 视频作为睾丸扭转信息来源的质量评估。
Front Public Health. 2022 May 18;10:905609. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.905609. eCollection 2022.
2
Analysis of quality information provided by "Dr. YouTube" on Phimosis.分析“Dr. YouTube”上提供的关于包茎的质量信息。
Int J Impot Res. 2023 Jun;35(4):398-403. doi: 10.1038/s41443-022-00557-5. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
3
Analysis of videos about vesicoureteral reflux on YouTube.YouTube上关于膀胱输尿管反流的视频分析。
J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Dec;17(6):858.e1-858.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.10.006. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
4
Quality analysis of testicular cancer videos on YouTube.YouTube 上睾丸癌视频的质量分析。
Andrologia. 2021 Sep;53(8):e14118. doi: 10.1111/and.14118. Epub 2021 May 19.
5
YouTube as a source of information on gout: a quality analysis.YouTube 作为痛风信息来源的质量分析。
Rheumatol Int. 2021 Jul;41(7):1321-1328. doi: 10.1007/s00296-021-04813-7. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
6
Evaluation of educational value of YouTube videos addressing robotic pyeloplasty in children.评估针对儿童机器人肾盂成形术的 YouTube 视频的教育价值。
J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Jun;17(3):390.e1-390.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.12.025. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
7
YouTube as a source of information on fibromyalgia.YouTube 作为纤维肌痛信息来源。
Int J Rheum Dis. 2021 Feb;24(2):197-202. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.14043. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
8
Analysis of the YouTube videos on pelvic floor muscle exercise training in terms of their reliability and quality.对YouTube上有关盆底肌肉锻炼训练视频的可靠性和质量进行分析。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2021 Jan;53(1):1-6. doi: 10.1007/s11255-020-02620-w. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
9
Can YouTube English Videos Be Recommended as an Accurate Source for Learning About Testicular Self-examination?YouTube 英文视频可否被推荐为学习睾丸自查的准确来源?
Urology. 2020 Nov;145:181-189. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.06.082. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
10
Consulting "Dr. YouTube": an objective evaluation of hypospadias videos on a popular video-sharing website.咨询“Dr. YouTube”:对热门视频分享网站上的尿道下裂视频的客观评估。
J Pediatr Urol. 2020 Feb;16(1):70.e1-70.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.11.011. Epub 2019 Dec 4.