Institut für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Studiengang Physiotherapie, Pain and Exercise Research Luebeck (P.E.R.L), Universität zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Deutschland.
Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health, Safety and Society, Furtwangen University, Furtwangen, Germany.
J Headache Pain. 2023 Dec 1;24(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s10194-023-01697-9.
Cutaneous allodynia is highly prevalent among migraineurs and is associated with a poor prognosis. The Allodynia Symptom Checklist (ASC-12) is a comprehensive questionnaire to identify the presence and severity of allodynia. Our aim was to translate and adapt the ASC-12 to German and evaluate its measurement properties.
Following the COSMIN guidelines, 80 migraine patients were enrolled in the study to evaluate the stages of translation (n=30) and measurement propriety assessment (n=50), respectively. After reaching a final version, the German ASC-12 was assessed for structural validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct validity and absolute agreement, using mechanical and thermal pain thresholds as reference method.
The German version of the ASC-12 presented an adequate structural validity compatible with the original version of the questionnaire. Its internal consistency ranged from 0.70 to 0.80 considering the total score and the thermic, static and dynamic mechanic subdomains. The total score presented excellent reliability (ICC: 0.85) with a standard error of measurement of 1.15 points and smallest detectable change of 3.40 points. ASC-12 total scores were correlated with headache intensity (r=0.38, p=0.004), headache disability (r=0.37, p=0.004) and cold pain thresholds (r=0.28, p=0.025). The thermic allodynia ASC-12 scores were correlated with cold (r=0.36, p=0.005) and heat (r=-0.30, p=0.010) pain thresholds, while the static mechanical allodynia ASC-12 scores correlated with mechanical pain threshold (r=0.29, p=0.019) and with mechanical pain sensitivity (r=0.24 to 0.28, p< 0.045). Despite no significant bias between methods, quantitative sensory testing (QST) results and ASC-12 scores tend to disagree.
The German version of the ASC-12 is available for research and clinical settings and presented adequate measurement proprieties, as the original version. Despite the correlation between the ASC-12 and QST, one method cannot be replaced by the other.
皮肤痛觉过敏在偏头痛患者中非常普遍,且与不良预后相关。痛觉过敏症状检查表(ASC-12)是一种全面的问卷,用于识别痛觉过敏的存在和严重程度。我们的目的是将 ASC-12 翻译并改编为德语,并评估其测量特性。
根据 COSMIN 指南,分别纳入 80 名偏头痛患者进行翻译阶段(n=30)和测量特性评估(n=50)。达成最终版本后,使用机械和热痛阈值作为参考方法,评估德国 ASC-12 的结构效度、内部一致性、重测信度、结构效度和绝对一致性。
德国版 ASC-12 具有与问卷原始版本相匹配的适当结构效度。其内部一致性在考虑总分和温热、静态和动态力学子域时,范围为 0.70 至 0.80。总分具有极好的可靠性(ICC:0.85),测量误差为 1.15 点,最小可检测变化为 3.40 点。ASC-12 总分与头痛强度(r=0.38,p=0.004)、头痛残疾(r=0.37,p=0.004)和冷痛阈值(r=0.28,p=0.025)相关。温热痛觉过敏 ASC-12 评分与冷(r=0.36,p=0.005)和热(r=-0.30,p=0.010)痛阈值相关,而静态机械痛觉过敏 ASC-12 评分与机械痛阈值(r=0.29,p=0.019)和机械痛敏(r=0.24 至 0.28,p<0.045)相关。尽管两种方法之间没有显著的偏差,但定量感觉测试(QST)结果和 ASC-12 评分之间存在差异。
德国版 ASC-12 可用于研究和临床环境,具有与原始版本相同的适当测量特性。尽管 ASC-12 与 QST 相关,但一种方法不能替代另一种方法。