• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用基因组测序数据评估疾病监测策略。

Leveraging genomic sequencing data to evaluate disease surveillance strategies.

作者信息

Anderson Benjamin, Ouyang Derek, D'Agostino Alexis, Bonin Brandon, Smith Emily, Kraushaar Vit, Rudman Sarah L, Ho Daniel E

机构信息

Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.

County of Santa Clara Public Health Department, San Jose, CA 95126, USA.

出版信息

iScience. 2023 Nov 19;26(12):108488. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.108488. eCollection 2023 Dec 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.isci.2023.108488
PMID:38089591
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10711492/
Abstract

In the face of scarce public health resources, it is critical to understand which disease surveillance strategies are effective, yet such validation has historically been difficult. From May 1 to December 31, 2021, a cohort study was carried out in Santa Clara County, California, in which 10,131 high-quality genomic sequences from COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction tests were merged with disease surveillance data. We measured the informational value, the fraction of sequenced links surfaced that are biologically plausible according to genomic sequence data, of different disease surveillance strategies. Contact tracing appeared more effective than spatiotemporal methods at uncovering nonresidential spread settings, school reporting appeared more fruitful than workplace reporting, and passively retrieved links through survey information presented some promise. Given the rapidly dwindling cost of sequencing, the informational value metric may enable near real-time, readily available evaluation of strategies by public health authorities to fight viral diseases beyond COVID-19.

摘要

面对稀缺的公共卫生资源,了解哪些疾病监测策略有效至关重要,但历史上这种验证一直很困难。2021年5月1日至12月31日,在加利福尼亚州圣克拉拉县进行了一项队列研究,其中将来自新冠病毒聚合酶链反应检测的10131个高质量基因组序列与疾病监测数据合并。我们测量了不同疾病监测策略的信息价值,即根据基因组序列数据在生物学上合理的测序关联比例。在发现非家庭传播场所方面,接触者追踪似乎比时空方法更有效,学校报告似乎比工作场所报告更有成效,并且通过调查信息被动获取的关联显示出一定前景。鉴于测序成本迅速下降,信息价值指标可能使公共卫生当局能够近乎实时、随时对除新冠病毒之外的抗击病毒性疾病的策略进行评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fe6/10711492/c6689da98c11/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fe6/10711492/716cc60a57d1/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fe6/10711492/c6689da98c11/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fe6/10711492/716cc60a57d1/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fe6/10711492/c6689da98c11/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Leveraging genomic sequencing data to evaluate disease surveillance strategies.利用基因组测序数据评估疾病监测策略。
iScience. 2023 Nov 19;26(12):108488. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.108488. eCollection 2023 Dec 15.
2
Rapid Sentinel Surveillance for COVID-19 - Santa Clara County, California, March 2020.COVID-19 快速监测 - 加利福尼亚州圣克拉拉县,2020 年 3 月。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Apr 10;69(14):419-421. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6914e3.
3
Using genomic epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 to support contact tracing and public health surveillance in rural Humboldt County, California.利用 SARS-CoV-2 的基因组流行病学来支持加利福尼亚州洪堡县农村地区的接触者追踪和公共卫生监测。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Mar 7;22(1):456. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12790-0.
4
Introduction, Transmission Dynamics, and Fate of Early Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Lineages in Santa Clara County, California.引言、传播动态以及加利福尼亚州圣克拉拉县早期严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 谱系的命运。
J Infect Dis. 2021 Jul 15;224(2):207-217. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiab199.
5
High-precision and cost-efficient sequencing for real-time COVID-19 surveillance.实时 COVID-19 监测的高精度、低成本测序。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 1;11(1):13669. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93145-4.
6
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.在普通人群中进行 SARS-CoV-2 监测的四种不同策略的有效性和成本效益(CoV-Surv 研究):一项关于集群随机、双因素对照试验的研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 8;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04982-z.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
COVID-19 Variant Surveillance and Social Determinants in Central Massachusetts: Development Study.马萨诸塞州中部的新冠病毒变异监测与社会决定因素:发展研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jun 13;6(6):e37858. doi: 10.2196/37858.
9
Phased Return of Students to 77 Transitional Kindergarten-8th Grade Schools With Cohesive Mitigation Strategies Serving as Protective Factors Against the Increase of COVID-19 Cases in Marin County: September 2020-January 2021.学生分阶段重返马林县77所过渡幼儿园至八年级学校,采用连贯的缓解策略作为预防新冠病毒病例增加的保护因素:2020年9月至2021年1月
Cureus. 2021 Nov 22;13(11):e19821. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19821. eCollection 2021 Nov.
10
COVID-19 surveillance in Democratic Republic of Congo, Nigeria, Senegal and Uganda: strengths, weaknesses and key Lessons.刚果民主共和国、尼日利亚、塞内加尔和乌干达的 COVID-19 监测:优势、劣势和关键经验教训。
BMC Public Health. 2023 May 8;23(1):835. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15708-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of Allocation Schemes of COVID-19 Testing Resources in a Community-Based Door-to-Door Testing Program.社区逐户新冠病毒检测项目中新冠病毒检测资源分配方案的评价。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Aug 27;2(8):e212260. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.2260. eCollection 2021 Aug.
2
Utilizing prospective space-time scan statistics to discover the dynamics of coronavirus disease 2019 clusters in the State of São Paulo, Brazil.利用时空前瞻性扫描统计方法发现巴西圣保罗州 2019 年冠状病毒病聚集性的动态变化。
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2022 Aug 5;55:e0607. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0607-2021. eCollection 2022.
3
Workplaces Most Affected by COVID-19 Outbreaks in California, January 2020-August 2021.
加利福尼亚州 2020 年 1 月至 2021 年 8 月期间受 COVID-19 疫情影响最严重的工作场所。
Am J Public Health. 2022 Aug;112(8):1180-1190. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2022.306862.
4
Effectiveness of contact tracing in the control of infectious diseases: a systematic review.接触者追踪在传染病控制中的效果:系统评价。
Lancet Public Health. 2022 Mar;7(3):e259-e273. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00001-9. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
5
Phylogenetic estimates of SARS-CoV-2 introductions into Washington State.对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)传入华盛顿州的系统发育估计。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2021 Sep;1:100018. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2021.100018. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
6
GISAID's Role in Pandemic Response.全球流感共享数据库(GISAID)在大流行应对中的作用。
China CDC Wkly. 2021 Dec 3;3(49):1049-1051. doi: 10.46234/ccdcw2021.255.
7
The role of viral genomics in understanding COVID-19 outbreaks in long-term care facilities.病毒基因组学在理解长期护理机构中 COVID-19 爆发中的作用。
Lancet Microbe. 2022 Feb;3(2):e151-e158. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00208-1. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
8
Measuring the scientific effectiveness of contact tracing: Evidence from a natural experiment.衡量接触者追踪的科学效果:来自自然实验的证据。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Aug 17;118(33). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2100814118.
9
Genomic surveillance to combat COVID-19: challenges and opportunities.基因组监测应对 COVID-19:挑战与机遇。
Lancet Microbe. 2021 Sep;2(9):e481-e484. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00121-X. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
10
Real time surveillance of COVID-19 space and time clusters during the summer 2020 in Spain.2020 年夏季西班牙 COVID-19 时空聚集的实时监测。
BMC Public Health. 2021 May 21;21(1):961. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10961-z.