Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, UK.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Dec 15;23(1):1420. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10428-4.
Caregivers of children with developmental disabilities (DDs) in Ethiopia experience stigma and exclusion. Due to limited existing services and substantial barriers to accessing care, they often lack support. Caregiver empowerment could help address injustices that hinder their capacity to support their child as they would like. The aim of this study was to explore the meaning and potential role of empowerment for caregivers raising a child with a DD and how empowerment was situated in relation to other priorities in service development.
This was a qualitative phenomenological study. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in Amharic and English with caregivers of children with a DD (n = 15), clinicians (n = 11), community-based health extension workers (n = 5), representatives of non-governmental organisations working with families with DDs (n = 17), and representatives of local authorities in health, education, and social care (n = 15). Data were analysed thematically.
Three main themes were developed: "Barriers to exercising caregivers' agency"; "Whose decision is it to initiate empowerment?"; and "Supporting caregivers through support groups". Caregiver capacity to do what they thought was best for their child was undermined by poverty, a sense of hopelessness, experience of domestic abuse and multiple burdens experienced by those who were single mothers. Caregivers were nonetheless active in seeking to bring about change for their children. Caregivers and professionals considered support groups to be instrumental in facilitating empowerment. Participants reflected that caregiver-focused interventions could contribute to increasing caregivers' capacity to exercise their agency. A tension existed between a focus on individualistic notions of empowerment from some professionals compared to a focus on recognising expertise by experience identified as vital by caregivers. Power dynamics in the context of external funding of empowerment programmes could paradoxically disempower.
Caregivers of children with DDs in Ethiopia are disempowered through poverty, stigma, and poor access to information and resources. Shifting power to caregivers and increasing their access to opportunities should be done on their own terms and in response to their prioritised needs.
在埃塞俄比亚,照顾发育障碍儿童(DD)的照料者经历污名化和排斥。由于现有的服务有限,而且获得护理的障碍很大,他们往往得不到支持。赋予照顾者权力可以帮助解决阻碍他们发挥能力以支持孩子的不公正现象。本研究旨在探讨赋权对照顾发育障碍儿童的照料者的意义和潜在作用,以及赋权在服务发展的其他优先事项中的定位。
这是一项定性现象学研究。使用阿姆哈拉语和英语对半残疾儿童的照顾者(n=15)、临床医生(n=11)、社区卫生推广工作者(n=5)、与残疾家庭合作的非政府组织代表(n=17)以及当地卫生、教育和社会照顾当局的代表(n=15)进行了半结构化访谈。数据进行了主题分析。
制定了三个主要主题:“行使照顾者代理权的障碍”;“谁决定启动赋权?”;“通过支持小组支持照顾者”。贫困、绝望感、遭受家庭虐待以及单亲母亲所承受的多重负担,削弱了照顾者为孩子做他们认为最好的事情的能力。然而,照顾者仍积极寻求为孩子带来改变。照顾者和专业人员认为支持小组对于促进赋权至关重要。参与者反映,以照顾者为中心的干预措施可以有助于增强照顾者行使代理权的能力。一些专业人员关注个人主义的赋权观念,而另一些专业人员则关注通过经验识别专业知识,这两者之间存在紧张关系,这是照顾者认为至关重要的。在赋权计划外部资金的背景下,权力动态可能会适得其反地削弱权力。
埃塞俄比亚发育障碍儿童的照顾者因贫困、污名化和缺乏信息和资源而被剥夺权力。应该根据他们自己的条件和回应他们的优先需求,将权力转移给照顾者并增加他们获得机会的机会。