Lehrich Brandon M, Zhang Josephine, Monga Satdarshan P, Dhanasekaran Renumathy
Department of Pathology and Pittsburgh Liver Institute, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine and University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Staford, CA, 94303, USA.
J Hepatol. 2024 Mar;80(3):515-530. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2023.11.030. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
The diagnosis and management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have improved significantly in recent years. With the introduction of immunotherapy-based combination therapy, there has been a notable expansion in treatment options for patients with unresectable HCC. Simultaneously, innovative molecular tests for early detection and management of HCC are emerging. This progress prompts a key question: as liquid biopsy techniques rise in prominence, will they replace traditional tissue biopsies, or will both techniques remain relevant? Given the ongoing challenges of early HCC detection, including issues with ultrasound sensitivity, accessibility, and patient adherence to surveillance, the evolution of diagnostic techniques is more relevant than ever. Furthermore, the accurate stratification of HCC is limited by the absence of reliable biomarkers which can predict response to therapies. While the advantages of molecular diagnostics are evident, their potential has not yet been fully harnessed, largely because tissue biopsies are not routinely performed for HCC. Liquid biopsies, analysing components such as circulating tumour cells, DNA, and extracellular vesicles, provide a promising alternative, though they are still associated with challenges related to sensitivity, cost, and accessibility. The early results from multi-analyte liquid biopsy panels are promising and suggest they could play a transformative role in HCC detection and management; however, comprehensive clinical validation is still ongoing. In this review, we explore the challenges and potential of both tissue and liquid biopsy, highlighting that these diagnostic methods, while distinct in their approaches, are set to jointly reshape the future of HCC management.
近年来,肝细胞癌(HCC)的诊断和管理有了显著改善。随着基于免疫疗法的联合治疗的引入,不可切除HCC患者的治疗选择有了显著扩展。同时,用于HCC早期检测和管理的创新分子检测方法也不断涌现。这一进展引发了一个关键问题:随着液体活检技术日益突出,它们会取代传统组织活检吗?还是这两种技术都将继续发挥作用?鉴于早期HCC检测仍面临诸多挑战,包括超声敏感性、可及性以及患者对监测的依从性等问题,诊断技术的发展比以往任何时候都更加重要。此外,由于缺乏能够预测治疗反应的可靠生物标志物,HCC的准确分层受到限制。虽然分子诊断的优势显而易见,但其潜力尚未得到充分发挥,这在很大程度上是因为HCC通常不进行组织活检。液体活检通过分析循环肿瘤细胞、DNA和细胞外囊泡等成分提供了一种有前景的替代方法,尽管它们仍面临与敏感性、成本和可及性相关的挑战。多分析物液体活检 panel 的早期结果很有前景,表明它们可能在HCC检测和管理中发挥变革性作用;然而,全面的临床验证仍在进行中。在本综述中,我们探讨了组织活检和液体活检的挑战与潜力,强调这些诊断方法虽然途径不同,但将共同重塑HCC管理的未来。