Borkovec T D, Grayson J B, O'Brien G T, Weerts T C
J Appl Behav Anal. 1979 Spring;12(1):37-54. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1979.12-37.
Twenty-nine insomniacs underwent four consecutive sleep laboratory evaluations before and after receiving tension-release relaxation training, no-tension-release relaxation training, or no-treatment. On the basis of the discrepancy between subjective and EEG-defined measures of latency to sleep onset, subjects were classified as pseudoinsomniacs or idiopathic insomniacs. As predicted, tension-release relaxation was significancy more effective than the other two conditions on subjective sleep measures, regardless of insomnia subtype and on objective sleep measures only for idiopathic insomniacs. Subjective improvement was maintained at 12-month followup. Numerous differences between the two subtypes emerged on pretherapy and during-therapy measures distinct from the latency measures, but changes on those variables were unrelated to outcome improvement.
29名失眠症患者在接受放松训练、非放松训练或不接受治疗前后,连续接受了四次睡眠实验室评估。根据主观测量和脑电图定义的入睡潜伏期之间的差异,将受试者分为假性失眠症患者或特发性失眠症患者。正如预期的那样,无论失眠亚型如何,放松训练在主观睡眠测量方面比其他两种情况更有效,而仅对特发性失眠症患者的客观睡眠测量有效。主观改善在12个月的随访中得以维持。在治疗前和治疗期间的测量中,除潜伏期测量外,两种亚型之间出现了许多差异,但这些变量的变化与结果改善无关。