• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人感音神经性听力损失(SNHL)的颈前庭诱发肌源性电位(cVEMP)发现:500Hz 短声刺激与窄带 CE-Chirp 刺激的比较。

Cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) findings in adults with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL): comparisons between 500 Hz tone burst and narrowband CE-Chirp stimuli.

机构信息

Audiology Programme, School of Health Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 21;13(1):22842. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48810-1.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-48810-1
PMID:38129442
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10739870/
Abstract

There has been a growing interest in studying the usefulness of chirp stimuli in recording cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) waveforms. Nevertheless, the study outcomes are debatable and require verification. In view of this, the aim of the present study was to compare cVEMP results when elicited by 500 Hz tone burst and narrowband (NB) CE-Chirp stimuli in adults with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). Fifty adults with bilateral SNHL (aged 20-65 years) underwent the cVEMP testing based on the established protocol. The 500 Hz tone burst and NB CE-Chirp (centred at 500 Hz) stimuli were presented to each ear at an intensity level of 120.5 dB peSPL. P1 latency, N1 latency, and P1-N1 amplitude values were analysed accordingly. The NB CE-Chirp stimulus produced significantly shorter P1 and N1 latencies (p < 0.001) with large effect sizes (d > 0.80). In contrast, both stimuli elicited cVEMP responses with P1-N1 amplitude values that were not statistically different from one another (p = 0.157, d = 0.15). Additionally, age and hearing level were found to be significantly correlated (r = 0.56, p < 0.001), as were age and cVEMP amplitude for each stimulus (p < 0.001). To conclude, since both stimuli were presented at an equivalent intensity level (in dB peSPL), the shorter P1 and N1 latencies of cVEMP produced by the NB CE-Chirp stimulus (centred at 500 Hz) were unlikely due to enhanced saccular stimulation. Another more sensible reason is the temporal adjustment of the chirp stimulus.

摘要

人们对研究啁啾刺激在记录颈性前庭诱发肌源性电位(cVEMP)方面的有用性越来越感兴趣。然而,研究结果存在争议,需要验证。鉴于此,本研究旨在比较在患有感音神经性听力损失(SNHL)的成年人中,由 500 Hz 短音和窄带(NB)CE-Chirp 刺激引发的 cVEMP 结果。50 名双侧 SNHL 成人(年龄 20-65 岁)按照既定方案接受 cVEMP 测试。500 Hz 短音和 NB CE-Chirp(中心频率为 500 Hz)刺激以 120.5 dB peSPL 的强度水平分别呈现给每只耳朵。相应地分析 P1 潜伏期、N1 潜伏期和 P1-N1 幅度值。NB CE-Chirp 刺激产生的 P1 和 N1 潜伏期明显缩短(p<0.001),效应量较大(d>0.80)。相比之下,两种刺激均产生 cVEMP 反应,P1-N1 幅度值彼此之间无统计学差异(p=0.157,d=0.15)。此外,年龄和听力水平呈显著相关(r=0.56,p<0.001),每个刺激的年龄和 cVEMP 幅度也呈显著相关(p<0.001)。总之,由于两种刺激均以等效强度水平(dB peSPL)呈现,因此 NB CE-Chirp 刺激(中心频率为 500 Hz)产生的较短的 P1 和 N1 潜伏期不太可能是由于增强的球囊刺激所致。另一个更合理的原因是啁啾刺激的时间调整。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eae8/10739870/96bae5fc18cc/41598_2023_48810_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eae8/10739870/26cc80e10478/41598_2023_48810_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eae8/10739870/96bae5fc18cc/41598_2023_48810_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eae8/10739870/26cc80e10478/41598_2023_48810_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eae8/10739870/96bae5fc18cc/41598_2023_48810_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) findings in adults with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL): comparisons between 500 Hz tone burst and narrowband CE-Chirp stimuli.成人感音神经性听力损失(SNHL)的颈前庭诱发肌源性电位(cVEMP)发现:500Hz 短声刺激与窄带 CE-Chirp 刺激的比较。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 21;13(1):22842. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48810-1.
2
The Narrowband CE-Chirp Stimulus Does Not Necessarily Produce More Robust Cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential.窄带 CE-Chirp 刺激不一定能产生更可靠的颈前庭诱发肌源性电位。
Ear Hear. 2024;45(4):1010-1018. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001497. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
3
A meta-analysis comparing the performance of narrowband CE-Chirp and 500 Hz tone burst stimuli in recording cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP).一项比较窄带 CE-Chirp 和 500Hz 啁啾刺激在记录颈性前庭诱发肌源性电位(cVEMP)方面性能的荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 26;14(1):14707. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64402-z.
4
Comparison of Compressed High-Intensity Radar Pulse and Tone Burst Stimulation in Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials in Acute Peripheral Vestibular System Pathologies.比较急性外周前庭系统病变中压缩高强度雷达脉冲和啁啾刺激在前庭诱发肌源性电位中的应用。
J Int Adv Otol. 2023 Mar;19(2):130-139. doi: 10.5152/iao.2023.21560.
5
Can Narrow Band Chirp Stimulus Shake the Throne of 500 Hz Tone Burst Stimulus for Cervical Vestibular Myogenic Potentials?窄带啁啾刺激能否撼动500赫兹短纯音刺激在颈前庭肌源性电位检测中的主导地位?
J Audiol Otol. 2021 Apr;25(2):98-103. doi: 10.7874/jao.2020.00486. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
6
Cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential with chirp sounds.声刺激颈前庭诱发肌源性电位。
J Vestib Res. 2020;30(3):153-158. doi: 10.3233/VES-200704.
7
Cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential: A comparison of narrowband chirp, broadband chirp, tone burst and click stimulation.颈源性和眼源性前庭诱发肌源性电位:窄带啁啾、宽带啁啾、短声刺激和 click 刺激的比较。
Int J Audiol. 2023 Jun;62(6):579-586. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2022.2064924. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
8
Differences in bone conduction ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials to 500 Hz narrow band chirp stimulus and 500 Hz tone burst.500赫兹窄带啁啾刺激和500赫兹短纯音诱发的骨传导性眼前庭诱发肌源性电位的差异。
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2021 Aug;48(4):590-593. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2020.11.008. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
9
Comparison of cervical and ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential responses between tone burst versus chirp stimulation.比较短纯音刺激与啁啾刺激对颈肌和眼肌前庭诱发肌源性电位反应的影响。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 May;279(5):2339-2343. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-06936-w. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
10
Comparison of chirp versus click and tone pip stimulation for cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials.用于颈前庭诱发肌源性电位的啁啾声与短声及短纯音刺激的比较。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Dec;271(12):3139-46. doi: 10.1007/s00405-013-2724-5. Epub 2013 Nov 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Compressed High-Intensity Radar Pulse and Tone Burst Stimulation in Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials in Acute Peripheral Vestibular System Pathologies.比较急性外周前庭系统病变中压缩高强度雷达脉冲和啁啾刺激在前庭诱发肌源性电位中的应用。
J Int Adv Otol. 2023 Mar;19(2):130-139. doi: 10.5152/iao.2023.21560.
2
Comparison of Multifrequency Narrow-Band CE-Chirp and Tone Burst Evoked Cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials.多频窄带CE-啁啾与短纯音诱发的颈性前庭诱发肌源性电位的比较
J Am Acad Audiol. 2023 Mar;34(3-04):56-64. doi: 10.1055/a-2036-0510. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
3
Effects of Age and Middle Ear on the Frequency Tuning of the cVEMP and oVEMP.
年龄和中耳对 cVEMP 和 oVEMP 频率调谐的影响。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2022 May;33(5):259-269. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1747910. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
4
Cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential: A comparison of narrowband chirp, broadband chirp, tone burst and click stimulation.颈源性和眼源性前庭诱发肌源性电位:窄带啁啾、宽带啁啾、短声刺激和 click 刺激的比较。
Int J Audiol. 2023 Jun;62(6):579-586. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2022.2064924. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
5
Earlier Peak Latencies May Not Fully Reflect the Robustness of Cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential to CE-Chirp Stimulus.较早的峰潜伏期可能无法完全反映颈前庭诱发肌源性电位对CE-啁啾刺激的稳健性。
J Audiol Otol. 2022 Apr;26(2):108-109. doi: 10.7874/jao.2021.00458. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
6
Using Narrow Band CE-Chirps to Elicit Cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials.采用窄带 CE-Chirps 引出颈前庭诱发肌源性电位。
Ear Hear. 2022 May/Jun;43(3):941-948. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001146.
7
Comparison of cervical and ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential responses between tone burst versus chirp stimulation.比较短纯音刺激与啁啾刺激对颈肌和眼肌前庭诱发肌源性电位反应的影响。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 May;279(5):2339-2343. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-06936-w. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
8
Can Narrow Band Chirp Stimulus Shake the Throne of 500 Hz Tone Burst Stimulus for Cervical Vestibular Myogenic Potentials?窄带啁啾刺激能否撼动500赫兹短纯音刺激在颈前庭肌源性电位检测中的主导地位?
J Audiol Otol. 2021 Apr;25(2):98-103. doi: 10.7874/jao.2020.00486. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
9
Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in practice: Methods, pitfalls and clinical applications.实践中的前庭诱发肌源性电位:方法、陷阱与临床应用
Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2019 Feb 26;4:47-68. doi: 10.1016/j.cnp.2019.01.005. eCollection 2019.
10
Calibration of brief stimuli for the recording of evoked responses from the human auditory pathway.用于记录人类听觉通路诱发反应的简短刺激校准
J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 Jan;141(1):466. doi: 10.1121/1.4974145.