Audiology Programme, School of Health Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 21;13(1):22842. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48810-1.
There has been a growing interest in studying the usefulness of chirp stimuli in recording cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) waveforms. Nevertheless, the study outcomes are debatable and require verification. In view of this, the aim of the present study was to compare cVEMP results when elicited by 500 Hz tone burst and narrowband (NB) CE-Chirp stimuli in adults with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). Fifty adults with bilateral SNHL (aged 20-65 years) underwent the cVEMP testing based on the established protocol. The 500 Hz tone burst and NB CE-Chirp (centred at 500 Hz) stimuli were presented to each ear at an intensity level of 120.5 dB peSPL. P1 latency, N1 latency, and P1-N1 amplitude values were analysed accordingly. The NB CE-Chirp stimulus produced significantly shorter P1 and N1 latencies (p < 0.001) with large effect sizes (d > 0.80). In contrast, both stimuli elicited cVEMP responses with P1-N1 amplitude values that were not statistically different from one another (p = 0.157, d = 0.15). Additionally, age and hearing level were found to be significantly correlated (r = 0.56, p < 0.001), as were age and cVEMP amplitude for each stimulus (p < 0.001). To conclude, since both stimuli were presented at an equivalent intensity level (in dB peSPL), the shorter P1 and N1 latencies of cVEMP produced by the NB CE-Chirp stimulus (centred at 500 Hz) were unlikely due to enhanced saccular stimulation. Another more sensible reason is the temporal adjustment of the chirp stimulus.
人们对研究啁啾刺激在记录颈性前庭诱发肌源性电位(cVEMP)方面的有用性越来越感兴趣。然而,研究结果存在争议,需要验证。鉴于此,本研究旨在比较在患有感音神经性听力损失(SNHL)的成年人中,由 500 Hz 短音和窄带(NB)CE-Chirp 刺激引发的 cVEMP 结果。50 名双侧 SNHL 成人(年龄 20-65 岁)按照既定方案接受 cVEMP 测试。500 Hz 短音和 NB CE-Chirp(中心频率为 500 Hz)刺激以 120.5 dB peSPL 的强度水平分别呈现给每只耳朵。相应地分析 P1 潜伏期、N1 潜伏期和 P1-N1 幅度值。NB CE-Chirp 刺激产生的 P1 和 N1 潜伏期明显缩短(p<0.001),效应量较大(d>0.80)。相比之下,两种刺激均产生 cVEMP 反应,P1-N1 幅度值彼此之间无统计学差异(p=0.157,d=0.15)。此外,年龄和听力水平呈显著相关(r=0.56,p<0.001),每个刺激的年龄和 cVEMP 幅度也呈显著相关(p<0.001)。总之,由于两种刺激均以等效强度水平(dB peSPL)呈现,因此 NB CE-Chirp 刺激(中心频率为 500 Hz)产生的较短的 P1 和 N1 潜伏期不太可能是由于增强的球囊刺激所致。另一个更合理的原因是啁啾刺激的时间调整。