Sports Science School of Rio Maior-Polytechnic Institute of Santarém, 2040-413 Rio Maior, Portugal.
Life Quality Research Centre (CIEQV), Complexo Andaluz, Apartado, 2040-413 Rio Maior, Portugal.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Dec 13;59(12):2156. doi: 10.3390/medicina59122156.
: Research on female soccer players that analyzes playing status is scarce and has previously only examined load monitoring, while other markers, such as physical (i.e., strength, power, and agility), physiological (i.e., maximal oxygen uptake), and body composition (i.e., body fat mass, fat-free mass, body water, and phase angle) markers, warrant further investigation. Thus, the study aims were to (a) compare physical, physiological, body composition, and load markers between starters and non-starters; (b) compare measurements pre- and post-training intervention (five weeks); and (c) analyze any relationships between physical, physiological, body composition, and load markers in an elite female soccer team. : Fourteen first-team players participated in the study (age 23.29 ± 3.19 years, weight 59.14 ± 6.87 kg, height 1.66 ± 0.08 m). Several physical ( = 15), physiological ( = 1), body composition ( = 11), and load markers ( = 14) were collected. In addition, participants were sub-divided into starters ( = 7) and non-starters ( = 7). : No differences were revealed between starters and non-starters in any of the examined variables. Moreover, following the training intervention, a significantly lower value was found for total body water/fat-free mass ratio (p = 0.043; ES = 0.582). In addition, there were several correlations detected between load and physical/physiological markers ( = 28); load and body composition markers ( = 6); physical/physiological and body composition markers ( = 34); and physical and physiological markers ( = 42). In conclusion, only a slight tendency of higher load values for starters than non-starters was observed. In addition, no differences in physical, physiological, and body composition markers were found between starters and non-starters, possibly suggesting that five weeks were not enough to improve such variables. Finally, the present results provide novel information assessing the effects of the pre-season in elite female Portuguese soccer players and contribute to a better understanding of the associations between different types of measurements.
：对分析女性足球运动员比赛状态的研究很少，以前只检查了负荷监测，而其他标志物，如身体（即力量、力量和敏捷性）、生理（即最大摄氧量）和身体成分（即体脂肪量、去脂体重、身体水分和相位角）标志物，需要进一步研究。因此，研究目的是：(a)比较首发球员和非首发球员的身体、生理、身体成分和负荷标志物；(b)比较训练干预前后（五周）的测量值；(c)分析精英女子足球队中身体、生理、身体成分和负荷标志物之间的任何关系。：14 名一线队球员参加了这项研究（年龄 23.29 ± 3.19 岁，体重 59.14 ± 6.87 公斤，身高 1.66 ± 0.08 米）。收集了多项身体（= 15）、生理（= 1）、身体成分（= 11）和负荷标志物（= 14）。此外，参与者被分为首发球员（= 7）和非首发球员（= 7）。：在任何检查变量中，首发球员和非首发球员之间均未显示出差异。此外，在训练干预后，全身水/去脂体重比的数值明显降低（p = 0.043；ES = 0.582）。此外，还检测到负荷与身体/生理标志物之间的几个相关性（= 28）；负荷与身体成分标志物之间的相关性（= 6）；身体/生理和身体成分标志物之间的相关性（= 34）；以及身体和生理标志物之间的相关性（= 42）。综上所述，只观察到首发球员的负荷值略高于非首发球员。此外，首发球员和非首发球员之间在身体、生理和身体成分标志物方面没有差异，这可能表明五周的时间不足以改善这些变量。最后，本研究结果提供了评估葡萄牙精英女足足球运动员赛前赛季影响的新信息，并有助于更好地理解不同类型测量之间的关系。
