School of Sport, Rehabilitation and Exercise Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, United Kingdom.
Institute for Sport, Physical Activity and Leisure, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 30;17(6):e0268334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268334. eCollection 2022.
This review aimed to (1) systematically review the scientific literature evaluating the match-play characteristics of women's soccer, (2) determine the methods adopted to quantify match-play characteristics of women's soccer, and (3) present the physical, technical and tactical characteristics of women's soccer match-play across age-groups, playing standards and playing positions. A systematic search of electronic databases was conducted in May 2021; keywords relating to the population, soccer and match-play characteristics were used. Studies which quantified physical, technical or tactical performance of women's soccer players during match-play were included. Excluded studies included adapted match-play formats and training studies. Sixty-nine studies met the eligibility criteria. Studies predominantly quantified match-play characteristics of senior international (n = 27) and domestic (n = 30) women's soccer match-play, with only seven studies reporting youth match-play characteristics. Physical (n = 47), technical (n = 26) and tactical characteristics (n = 2) were reported as whole-match (n = 65), half-match (n = 21), segmental (n = 17) or peak (n = 8) characteristics. Beyond age-groups, playing standard, and playing position, fourteen studies quantified the impact of contextual factors, such as environment or match outcome, on match-play characteristics. Distance was the most commonly reported variable (n = 43), as outfield women's soccer players covered a total distance of 5480-11160 m during match-play. This systematic review highlights that physical match-performance increases between age-groups and playing standards, and differs between playing positions. However, further research is warranted to understand potential differences in technical and tactical match-performance. Coaches and practitioners can use the evidence presented within this review to inform population-specific practices, however, they should be mindful of important methodological limitations within the literature (e.g. inconsistent velocity and acceleration/deceleration thresholds). Future research should attempt to integrate physical, technical and tactical characteristics as opposed to quantifying characteristics in isolation, to gain a deeper and more holistic insight into match-performance.
(1)系统地回顾评估女子足球比赛特征的科学文献,(2)确定用于量化女子足球比赛特征的方法,(3)呈现不同年龄组、比赛水平和比赛位置的女子足球比赛的身体、技术和战术特征。2021 年 5 月,我们进行了系统的电子数据库检索;使用了与研究人群、足球和比赛特征相关的关键词。纳入的研究定量了女子足球运动员在比赛中的身体、技术或战术表现。排除了改编比赛形式和训练研究。符合纳入标准的研究有 69 项。这些研究主要量化了高级国际(n = 27)和国内(n = 30)女子足球比赛的比赛特征,只有 7 项研究报告了青年女子足球比赛特征。报告了身体(n = 47)、技术(n = 26)和战术特征(n = 2)的整体比赛(n = 65)、半场比赛(n = 21)、分段比赛(n = 17)或峰值比赛(n = 8)特征。除了年龄组、比赛水平和比赛位置,还有 14 项研究量化了环境或比赛结果等背景因素对比赛特征的影响。距离是最常报告的变量(n = 43),因为外场女子足球运动员在比赛中总共要跑 5480-11160 米。本系统综述强调,身体比赛表现随着年龄组和比赛水平的提高而增加,并且在不同的比赛位置之间有所不同。然而,需要进一步的研究来了解技术和战术比赛表现方面的潜在差异。教练和从业者可以使用本综述中提供的证据来指导特定人群的实践,但应注意文献中的重要方法学限制(例如,速度和加速度/减速度阈值不一致)。未来的研究应尝试整合身体、技术和战术特征,而不是孤立地量化特征,以更深入和更全面地了解比赛表现。