Wilson B, Cockburn J, Halligan P
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987 Feb;68(2):98-102.
The Rivermead Behavioral Inattention Test (RBIT), consisting of nine items sampling activities of daily living, was administered to 28 patients after unilateral right (20) or left (8) cerebrovascular accidents, and to 14 non-brain-damaged controls. All patients were tested on two parallel forms of the RBIT with order of presentation balanced and on at least two of six conventional tests of visual neglect. Control subjects were tested on either form 1 or form 2 of the RBIT. Interrater reliability of scoring was tested on seven subjects chosen at random. Using control scores to determine the cutoff point between visual inattention and noninattention, 14 patients (50%) showed evidence of visuospatial neglect on the RBIT. Correlation between the two forms of the test was 0.83. The RBIT also correlated well with five of the conventional tests. Interrater reliability was 100%. The RBIT appears to be a valid and reliable test of visuospatial neglect and one which is likely to provide more information about everyday problems than existing measures of neglect.
里弗米德行为疏忽测验（RBIT）由九项取样于日常生活活动的项目组成，该测验对28例单侧右侧（20例）或左侧（8例）脑血管意外患者以及14名无脑损伤的对照者进行了测试。所有患者均接受了两种平行形式的RBIT测试，测试顺序保持平衡，并且至少接受了六项常规视觉疏忽测试中的两项。对照者接受了RBIT的1号或2号形式的测试。对随机选择的七名受试者进行了评分者间信度测试。使用对照分数来确定视觉疏忽与无疏忽之间的临界点，14名患者（50%）在RBIT上表现出视觉空间疏忽的迹象。两种形式的测试之间的相关性为0.83。RBIT与五项常规测试的相关性也很好。评分者间信度为100%。RBIT似乎是一种有效且可靠的视觉空间疏忽测试，并且可能比现有的疏忽测量方法提供更多关于日常问题的信息。
