Mohsenpour Amir, Biddle Louise, Bozorgmehr Kayvan
Department of Population Medicine and Health Services Research, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Section for Health Equity Studies and Migration, Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Dec 27;3(12):e0001755. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001755. eCollection 2023.
Asylum seekers and refugees (ASR) in Germany are dispersed quasi-randomly to state-provided, collective accommodation centres. We aimed to analyse contextual effects of post-migration housing environment on their mental health. We drew a balanced random sample of 54 from 1 938 accommodation centres with 70 634 ASR in Germany's 3rd largest federal state. Individual-level data on depression and anxiety as well as sociodemographic- and asylum-related covariates, were collected and linked to contextual geo-referenced data on housing environment ('Small-area Housing Environment Deterioration' index, number of residents, remoteness, urbanity, and German Index of Multiple Deprivation). We fitted two-level random-intercept models to exploratively estimate adjusted contextual effects. Of 411 surveyed participants, 45.53% and 44.83%, respectively, reported symptoms of depression or anxiety. 52.8% lived in centres with highest deterioration, 46.2% in centres with > = 50 residents, 76.9% in urban, and 56% in deprived districts. 7.4% of centres were remote. We found statistically significant clustering in reporting anxiety on the level of accommodation centres. The model resulted in an intraclass correlation of 0.16 which translated into a median odds ratio of 2.10 for the accommodation-level effects. No significant clustering was found for symptoms of depression. The highest degree of deterioration, large accommodation size, remoteness, and district urbanity showed higher, but statistically not significant, odds for reporting anxiety or depression. District deprivation demonstrated higher odds for anxiety and lower odds for depression yet remained statistically insignificant for both. Evidence for contextual effects of housing environment on mental health of ASR could not be established but residual confounding by length of stay in the accommodation centre cannot be ruled out. Confirmatory analyses with prior power calculations are needed to complement these exploratory estimates.
德国的寻求庇护者和难民被近乎随机地安置到国家提供的集体收容中心。我们旨在分析移民后居住环境对其心理健康的背景影响。我们从德国第三大联邦州的1938个收容中心(其中有70634名寻求庇护者和难民)中随机抽取了54个样本,组成一个均衡样本。收集了个体层面关于抑郁和焦虑的数据,以及社会人口统计学和与庇护相关的协变量,并将其与关于居住环境的地理参考背景数据(“小区域住房环境恶化”指数、居民数量、偏远程度、城市化程度和德国多重贫困指数)相联系。我们拟合了两级随机截距模型,以探索性地估计调整后的背景影响。在411名接受调查的参与者中,分别有45.53%和44.83%的人报告有抑郁或焦虑症状。52.8%的人居住在恶化程度最高的中心,46.2%的人居住在居民人数≥50人的中心,76.9%的人居住在城市地区,56%的人居住在贫困地区。7.4%的中心地处偏远。我们发现在收容中心层面,报告焦虑存在统计学上显著的聚集性。该模型得出的组内相关系数为0.16,这转化为收容层面影响的中位数优势比为2.10。未发现抑郁症状存在显著的聚集性。最高程度的恶化、较大的收容规模、偏远程度和地区城市化程度显示出报告焦虑或抑郁的几率较高,但在统计学上不显著。地区贫困显示出焦虑几率较高而抑郁几率较低,但两者在统计学上均不显著。虽然无法确定居住环境对寻求庇护者和难民心理健康的背景影响,但不能排除在收容中心停留时间的残余混杂因素。需要进行带有事先功效计算的验证性分析来补充这些探索性估计。