Poizner H, Tallal P
Brain Lang. 1987 Jan;30(1):52-62. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(87)90027-7.
The auditory and visual modalities differ in their capacities for temporal analysis, and speech relies on more rapid temporal contrasts than does sign language. We examined whether congenitally deaf signers show enhanced or diminished capacities for processing rapidly varying visual signals in light of the differences in sensory and language experience of deaf and hearing individuals. Four experiments compared rapid temporal analysis in deaf signers and hearing subjects at three different levels: sensation, perception, and memory. Experiment 1 measured critical flicker frequency thresholds and Experiment 2, two-point thresholds to a flashing light. Experiments 3-4 investigated perception and memory for the temporal order of rapidly varying nonlinguistic visual forms. In contrast to certain previous studies, specifically those investigating the effects of short-term sensory deprivation, no significant differences between deaf and hearing subjects were found at any level. Deaf signers do not show diminished capacities for rapid temporal analysis, in comparison to hearing individuals. The data also suggest that the deficits in rapid temporal analysis reported previously for children with developmental language delay cannot be attributed to lack of experience with speech processing and production.
听觉和视觉通道在时间分析能力上存在差异,并且与手语相比,言语依赖于更快的时间对比。鉴于聋人和听力正常个体在感官和语言体验上的差异,我们研究了先天性失聪的手语使用者在处理快速变化的视觉信号方面的能力是增强还是减弱。四项实验在三个不同层面——感觉、知觉和记忆——比较了聋人手语使用者和听力正常受试者的快速时间分析能力。实验1测量了临界闪烁频率阈值,实验2测量了对闪烁光的两点阈值。实验3至4研究了对快速变化的非语言视觉形式的时间顺序的知觉和记忆。与之前的某些研究,特别是那些调查短期感觉剥夺影响的研究不同,在任何层面上,聋人和听力正常受试者之间均未发现显著差异。与听力正常个体相比,失聪的手语使用者在快速时间分析方面并未表现出能力减弱。数据还表明,先前报道的发育性语言迟缓儿童在快速时间分析方面的缺陷不能归因于缺乏言语处理和生成方面的经验。