Scott D L, Dawes P T, Fowler P D, Shadforth M F
Clin Rheumatol. 1986 Dec;5(4):445-9.
We examined two methods of calculating radiological progression in rheumatoid arthritis using hand and wrist radiographs scored by Larsen's method. Progression over 12 months was calculated in two ways: absolute change in score; relative change in score. The two methods of scoring progression were investigated in two studies. In the first 173 patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with a variety of non-steroidal and slow-acting anti-rheumatic drugs were evaluated. There were different results using absolute and relative changes in score. Relative changes gave more meaningful results. The second study looked at 80 rheumatoid patients treated with slow-acting drugs for 6 months; patients with a persistently high ESR had significantly more progression assessed by relative change but not by absolute change. Evaluating the progression of joint damage by methods employing a scoring system must be interpreted with caution. Relative change may provide a more valuable measure than absolute change.
我们使用经拉森方法评分的手部和腕部X光片,研究了两种计算类风湿性关节炎放射学进展的方法。12个月内的进展通过两种方式计算:分数的绝对变化;分数的相对变化。在两项研究中对这两种评分进展的方法进行了调查。在第一项研究中,评估了173名接受各种非甾体和慢效抗风湿药物治疗的类风湿性关节炎患者。使用分数的绝对变化和相对变化得出了不同的结果。相对变化给出了更有意义的结果。第二项研究观察了80名接受慢效药物治疗6个月的类风湿患者;红细胞沉降率持续较高的患者,通过相对变化评估的进展明显更多,但通过绝对变化评估则不然。采用评分系统的方法评估关节损伤的进展时必须谨慎解读。相对变化可能比绝对变化提供更有价值的衡量标准。