Rallis Kathrine S, Makker Shania, Ghose Aruni, Sideris Michail
Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, U.K.
Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, U.K.
Cancer Diagn Progn. 2024 Jan 3;4(1):1-8. doi: 10.21873/cdp.10278. eCollection 2024 Jan-Feb.
In the past decade, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have entered the treatment landscape of non-small-cell lung cancer, signalling a paradigm shift within the field characterized by significant survival benefits for patients with advanced and metastatic disease, and especially those with non-targetable genetic oncogenic driver mutations. However, the shift towards immune-based treatments has created new challenges in oncology. Atypical immunotherapy response patterns, including pseudo-progression and hyperprogressive disease, as well as immune-related adverse events have generated the need for new methods to predict patient response to treatment. Hence, new versions of the traditional Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors (RECIST) have emerged to help characterise with better accuracy radiological findings concerning patient response classification to immunotherapy. This review discusses response evaluation criteria relevant to unique radiological findings observed in patients treated with immunotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer.
在过去十年中,免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)已进入非小细胞肺癌的治疗领域,标志着该领域的范式转变,其特点是晚期和转移性疾病患者,尤其是那些具有不可靶向的基因致癌驱动突变的患者的生存率显著提高。然而,向基于免疫的治疗方法的转变在肿瘤学领域带来了新的挑战。非典型免疫治疗反应模式,包括假性进展和超进展性疾病,以及免疫相关不良事件,催生了预测患者治疗反应的新方法的需求。因此,传统实体瘤疗效评价标准(RECIST)的新版本应运而生,以更准确地描述与免疫治疗患者反应分类相关的放射学检查结果。本综述讨论了与非小细胞肺癌免疫治疗患者中观察到的独特放射学检查结果相关的疗效评价标准。