Suppr超能文献

步行上班:工作场所周边的适宜步行性在荷兰成年通勤人群中的作用。

Walking to work: The role of walkability around the workplace in a Dutch adult commuting population.

作者信息

Osmënaj Tea, Lam Thao Minh, Wagtendonk Alfred J, den Braver Nicolette R

机构信息

Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Epidemiology and Data Science, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

The National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands.

出版信息

SSM Popul Health. 2023 Dec 10;25:101578. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101578. eCollection 2024 Mar.

Abstract

Current evidence on neighborhood walkability and active commuting focuses on residential rather than workplace environment. This cross-sectional study investigated whether higher workplace walkability (WW) was associated with commute walking, both independently and together with residential walkability, using data from 6769 respondents of the 2017 Dutch national travel survey. In a fully adjusted logistic regression model, 10% increase in WW was associated with 32% higher odds of commute walking (Odds ratio (OR): 1.31, 95% Confidence Interval (CI: 1.27-1.36). The estimates were stronger in rural dwellers than urban residents, (OR 1.49, 95%CI: 1.34-1.64 vs OR. 1.19, 95%CI: 1.13-1.26). In participants with both high residential walkability and WW, we observed 215% higher odds (OR 3.15, 95% CI: 2.48-3.99) of commute walking compared to those with low walkability in both. Our study indicated the importance and complementary nature of walkable residence and workplace in contribution to physical activity of working individuals through active commuting.

摘要

目前关于邻里步行便利性和主动通勤的证据主要集中在居住环境而非工作场所环境。这项横断面研究利用2017年荷兰全国旅行调查中6769名受访者的数据,调查了较高的工作场所步行便利性(WW)是否与通勤步行有关,以及它与居住步行便利性单独或共同的关系。在一个完全调整的逻辑回归模型中,WW提高10%与通勤步行的几率高出32%相关(优势比(OR):1.31,95%置信区间(CI):1.27 - 1.36)。农村居民的估计结果比城市居民更强(OR 1.49,95%CI:1.34 - 1.64 对比 OR 1.19,95%CI:1.13 - 1.26)。在居住步行便利性和WW都高的参与者中,与两者步行便利性都低的人相比,我们观察到通勤步行的几率高出215%(OR 3.15,95%CI:2.48 - 3.99)。我们的研究表明,适宜步行的居住和工作场所对于通过主动通勤促进在职人员身体活动具有重要性和互补性。

相似文献

1
Walking to work: The role of walkability around the workplace in a Dutch adult commuting population.
SSM Popul Health. 2023 Dec 10;25:101578. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101578. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Does Environmental Walkability Matter? The Role of Walkable Environment in Active Commuting.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 15;17(4):1261. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041261.
3
Associations between neighborhood walkability and walking following residential relocation: Findings from Alberta's Tomorrow Project.
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 16;10:1116691. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1116691. eCollection 2022.
7
Correlates of non-concordance between perceived and objective measures of walkability.
Ann Behav Med. 2009 Apr;37(2):228-38. doi: 10.1007/s12160-009-9098-3. Epub 2009 Apr 25.
9
Commuting by public transit and physical activity: where you live, where you work, and how you get there.
J Phys Act Health. 2011 Jan;8 Suppl 1:S72-82. doi: 10.1123/jpah.8.s1.s72.
10
Development of an objectively measured walkability index for the Netherlands.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022 May 2;19(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12966-022-01270-8.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Development of an objectively measured walkability index for the Netherlands.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022 May 2;19(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12966-022-01270-8.
2
Development of a neighborhood drivability index and its association with transportation behavior in Toronto.
Environ Int. 2022 May;163:107182. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107182. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
4
Associations between the built environment and obesity: an umbrella review.
Int J Health Geogr. 2021 Feb 1;20(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12942-021-00260-6.
7
Active Commuting and Physical Fitness: A Systematic Review.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 15;17(8):2721. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082721.
9
Active Commuting and Multiple Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Sports Med. 2019 Mar;49(3):437-452. doi: 10.1007/s40279-018-1023-0.
10
Sedentariness and Health: Is Sedentary Behavior More Than Just Physical Inactivity?
Front Public Health. 2018 Sep 10;6:258. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00258. eCollection 2018.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验