• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用代达罗斯计划在控制新冠病毒传播的同时优化社会和经济活动。

Optimizing social and economic activity while containing SARS-CoV-2 transmission using DAEDALUS.

作者信息

Haw David J, Forchini Giovanni, Doohan Patrick, Christen Paula, Pianella Matteo, Johnson Robert, Bajaj Sumali, Hogan Alexandra B, Winskill Peter, Miraldo Marisa, White Peter J, Ghani Azra C, Ferguson Neil M, Smith Peter C, Hauck Katharina D

机构信息

MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis & WHO Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Modelling, Jameel Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.

USBE, Umeå Universitet, Umeå, Sweden.

出版信息

Nat Comput Sci. 2022 Apr;2(4):223-233. doi: 10.1038/s43588-022-00233-0. Epub 2022 Apr 28.

DOI:10.1038/s43588-022-00233-0
PMID:38177553
Abstract

To study the trade-off between economic, social and health outcomes in the management of a pandemic, DAEDALUS integrates a dynamic epidemiological model of SARS-CoV-2 transmission with a multi-sector economic model, reflecting sectoral heterogeneity in transmission and complex supply chains. The model identifies mitigation strategies that optimize economic production while constraining infections so that hospital capacity is not exceeded but allowing essential services, including much of the education sector, to remain active. The model differentiates closures by economic sector, keeping those sectors open that contribute little to transmission but much to economic output and those that produce essential services as intermediate or final consumption products. In an illustrative application to 63 sectors in the United Kingdom, the model achieves an economic gain of between £161 billion (24%) and £193 billion (29%) compared to a blanket lockdown of non-essential activities over six months. Although it has been designed for SARS-CoV-2, DAEDALUS is sufficiently flexible to be applicable to pandemics with different epidemiological characteristics.

摘要

为了研究大流行管理中经济、社会和健康结果之间的权衡,代达罗斯将SARS-CoV-2传播的动态流行病学模型与多部门经济模型相结合,反映了传播中的部门异质性和复杂的供应链。该模型确定了缓解策略,这些策略在限制感染的同时优化经济生产,以使医院容量不被超过,同时允许包括大部分教育部门在内的基本服务保持运转。该模型按经济部门区分关闭措施,让那些对传播贡献小但对经济产出贡献大的部门以及那些生产基本服务作为中间或最终消费产品的部门保持开放。在对英国63个部门的一个示例应用中,与对非必要活动进行为期六个月的全面封锁相比,该模型实现了1610亿英镑(24%)至1930亿英镑(29%)的经济收益。尽管代达罗斯是为SARS-CoV-2设计的,但它具有足够的灵活性,可应用于具有不同流行病学特征的大流行。

相似文献

1
Optimizing social and economic activity while containing SARS-CoV-2 transmission using DAEDALUS.利用代达罗斯计划在控制新冠病毒传播的同时优化社会和经济活动。
Nat Comput Sci. 2022 Apr;2(4):223-233. doi: 10.1038/s43588-022-00233-0. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
2
The potential health and economic value of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination alongside physical distancing in the UK: a transmission model-based future scenario analysis and economic evaluation.英国新冠病毒疫苗接种与保持社交距离相结合的潜在健康和经济价值:基于传播模型的未来情景分析与经济评估
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Jul;21(7):962-974. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00079-7. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
3
Optimal timing and effectiveness of COVID-19 outbreak responses in China: a modelling study.中国 COVID-19 疫情应对的最佳时机和效果:建模研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Apr 7;22(1):679. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12659-2.
4
Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review.学校为遏制新冠疫情而采取的措施:一项范围综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 17;12(12):CD013812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013812.
5
SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and Construction Industry: insights from Italian data.SARS-CoV-2 大流行与建筑行业:来自意大利数据的洞察。
Acta Biomed. 2022 Jul 1;93(3):e2022233. doi: 10.23750/abm.v93i3.12265.
6
Assessing COVID-19 pandemic policies and behaviours and their economic and educational trade-offs across US states from Jan 1, 2020, to July 31, 2022: an observational analysis.评估 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 7 月 31 日美国各州的 COVID-19 大流行政策和行为及其经济和教育方面的权衡取舍:一项观察性分析。
Lancet. 2023 Apr 22;401(10385):1341-1360. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00461-0. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
7
Epidemiological and economic impact of COVID-19 in the US.新冠疫情对美国的流行病学和经济影响。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 14;11(1):20451. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99712-z.
8
Quantifying economic-social-environmental trade-offs and synergies of water-supply constraints: An application to the capital region of China.量化供水限制的经济-社会-环境权衡与协同效应:以中国首都地区为例。
Water Res. 2021 May 1;195:116986. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2021.116986. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
9
Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic.学校为控制 COVID-19 疫情而采取的措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 17;1(1):CD015029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015029.
10
COVID-19 cluster size and transmission rates in schools from crowdsourced case reports.基于众包病例报告的学校 COVID-19 聚集规模和传播率。
Elife. 2022 Oct 21;11:e76174. doi: 10.7554/eLife.76174.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimal pandemic control strategies and cost-effectiveness of COVID-19 non-pharmaceutical interventions in the United States.美国新冠疫情的最佳防控策略及非药物干预措施的成本效益
BMC Glob Public Health. 2025 Sep 12;3(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s44263-025-00189-z.
2
Changes in self-reported physical and mental health, behaviour and economic status among adults by known seropositivity and sociodemographic factors before and after the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak in Ischgl, Austria.奥地利伊施格尔新冠疫情爆发前后,按已知血清阳性情况及社会人口学因素划分的成年人自我报告的身心健康、行为及经济状况变化。
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 2;13:1488108. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1488108. eCollection 2025.
3
From node to network: weaving a global perspective on efficacy and costs of non-pharmaceutical interventions.
从节点到网络:构建关于非药物干预措施的效果和成本的全球视角。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 22;15(1):2844. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-87566-8.
4
The peculiar characteristics and advancement in diagnostic methodologies of influenza A virus.甲型流感病毒的独特特征及诊断方法的进展
Front Microbiol. 2025 Jan 7;15:1435384. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1435384. eCollection 2024.
5
The interaction of disease transmission, mortality, and economic output over the first 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic.2019冠状病毒病大流行头两年中疾病传播、死亡率和经济产出之间的相互作用。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 13;19(6):e0301785. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301785. eCollection 2024.
6
Optimal social distancing in epidemic control: cost prioritization, adherence and insights into preparedness principles.疫情控制中的最佳社交距离:成本优先、遵循和对准备原则的洞察。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 22;14(1):4365. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54955-4.
7
Promoting healthy populations as a pandemic preparedness strategy: a simulation study from Mexico.将促进人群健康作为大流行防范策略:来自墨西哥的一项模拟研究
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Feb 2;30:100682. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100682. eCollection 2024 Feb.
8
The societal value of SARS-CoV-2 booster vaccination in Indonesia.SARS-CoV-2 加强针接种在印度尼西亚的社会价值。
Vaccine. 2023 Mar 10;41(11):1885-1891. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.01.068. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
9
'Dynamic zero-COVID' policy and viral clearance during an omicron wave in Tianjin, China: a city-wide retrospective observational study.中国天津奥密克戎疫情期间的“动态清零”政策与病毒清除:全市回顾性观察研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 15;12(12):e066359. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066359.
10
Data needs for integrated economic-epidemiological models of pandemic mitigation policies.大流行缓解政策的综合经济-流行病学模型的数据需求。
Epidemics. 2022 Dec;41:100644. doi: 10.1016/j.epidem.2022.100644. Epub 2022 Nov 1.