Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Samsun University Faculty of Medicine, Samsun Training and Research Hospital, Samsun, Turkey.
Department of General Surgery, Samsun University Faculty of Medicine, Samsun Training and Research Hospital, Samsun, Turkey.
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2024 Apr;77(2):255-264. doi: 10.4097/kja.23404. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
BACKGROUND: Open inguinal hernia repair (OIHR) surgery is a common surgical procedure, and ultrasound guided interfascial plane blocks can also be included in current approaches to postoperative multimodal analgesia regimens. This study aimed to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and transversalis fascia plane block (TFPB) in patients undergoing OIHR. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, assessor-blinded comparative study was conducted in the postoperative recovery room and ward of a tertiary hospital. A total of 80 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-III were enrolled and allocated equally to either the ESPB or TFPB group. The patients received standard multimodal analgesia in addition to an ultrasound-guided ESPB or TFPB. During the first 24 h postoperatively, tramadol consumption was assessed and pain levels at rest and during movement were compared using numeric rating scale (NRS) scores at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 h postoperatively. RESULTS: The results showed no difference in NRS scores at any time point between the groups, except for NRS at rest in the third hour. However, tramadol consumption was lower in the TFPB group than in the ESPB group overall (88 ± 75.2 vs. 131 ± 93.7 mg, respectively; P = 0.027, mean difference: -43, 95% CI [-80.82, -5.18]). CONCLUSIONS: The TFPB leads to lower tramadol requirements in the first 24 h postoperatively than the ESPB in patients undergoing OIHR.
背景:开放式腹股沟疝修补术(OIHR)是一种常见的手术,超声引导的筋膜间平面阻滞也可以包含在当前的多模式术后镇痛方案中。本研究旨在比较 OIHR 术后竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)和腹横筋膜平面阻滞(TFPB)的术后镇痛效果。
方法:这是一项在三级医院的术后恢复室和病房进行的前瞻性、随机、评估者盲法比较研究。共纳入 80 名美国麻醉医师协会身体状况 I-III 级的患者,并平均分为 ESPB 或 TFPB 组。患者在接受标准多模式镇痛的基础上,接受超声引导下的 ESPB 或 TFPB。术后 24 小时内,评估曲马多的消耗量,并在术后 1、3、6、9、12、18 和 24 小时使用数字评分量表(NRS)比较静息和运动时的疼痛水平。
结果:结果显示,两组在任何时间点的 NRS 评分均无差异,除了第 3 小时静息时的 NRS 评分。然而,总的来说,TFPB 组的曲马多消耗量低于 ESPB 组(88±75.2 与 131±93.7 mg,分别;P=0.027,平均差异:-43,95%CI[-80.82,-5.18])。
结论:在接受 OIHR 的患者中,TFPB 在术后 24 小时内导致的曲马多需求低于 ESPB。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2022-7-21
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021-7