University of Warwick, PAIS Building, Coventry, CV47AL, UK.
Med Health Care Philos. 2024 Mar;27(1):107-119. doi: 10.1007/s11019-023-10188-2. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
Contributions to COVID-19 vaccination programmes promise valuable collective goods. They can support public and individual health by creating herd immunity and taking the pressure off overwhelmed public health services; support freedom of movement by enabling governments to remove restrictive lockdown policies; and improve economic and social well-being by allowing businesses, schools, and other essential public services to re-open. The vaccinated can contribute to the production of these goods. The unvaccinated, who benefit from, but who do not contribute to these goods can be morally criticised as free-riders. In this paper defends the claim that in the case of COVID-19, the unvaccinated are unfair free-riders. I defend the claim against two objections. First, that they are not unfair free-riders because they lack the subjective attitudes and intentions of free-riders; second, that although the unvaccinated may be free-riders, their free-riding is not unfair.
对 COVID-19 疫苗接种计划的贡献有望带来有价值的集体利益。通过建立群体免疫和减轻不堪重负的公共卫生服务的压力,它们可以支持公共和个人健康;通过使政府能够取消限制封锁政策,支持行动自由;通过允许企业、学校和其他基本公共服务重新开放,提高经济和社会福利。接种疫苗的人可以为这些商品的生产做出贡献。那些受益但没有为这些商品做出贡献的未接种疫苗的人可以被指责为搭便车者。本文为 COVID-19 情况下未接种疫苗的人是不公平的搭便车者这一说法辩护。我针对两个反对意见为这一说法辩护。首先,他们不是不公平的搭便车者,因为他们缺乏搭便车者的主观态度和意图;其次,尽管未接种疫苗的人可能是搭便车者,但他们的搭便车行为并不不公平。