Clinimetry and Technological Development in Therapeutic Exercise Research Group (CLIDET), Department of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Diabetes y Enfermedades Metabólicas Asociadas (CIBERDEM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2024 Jun;26(6):411-419. doi: 10.1089/dia.2023.0535.
This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of Dexcom G6 (DG6) and FreeStyle Libre-2 (FSL2) during aerobic training and high-intensity interval training (HIIT) in individuals with type 1 diabetes. Twenty-six males (mean age 29.3 ± 6.3 years and mean duration of diabetes 14.9 ± 6.1 years) participated in this study. Interstitial glucose levels were measured using DG6 and FSL2, while plasma glucose levels were measured every 10 min using YSI 2500 as the reference for glucose measurements in this study. The measurements began 20 min before the start of exercise and continued for 20 min after exercise. Seven measurements were taken for each subject and exercise. Both DG6 and FSL2 devices showed significant differences compared to YSI glucose data for both aerobic and HIIT exercises. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices exhibited superior performance during HIIT than aerobic training, with DG6 showing a mean absolute relative difference of 14.03% versus 31.98%, respectively. In the comparison between the two devices, FSL2 demonstrated significantly higher effectiveness in aerobic training, yet its performance was inferior to DG6 during HIIT. According to the 40/40 criteria, both sensors performed similarly, with marks over 93% for all ranges and both exercises, and above 99% for HIIT and in the >180 mg/dL range, which is in accordance with FDA guidelines. The findings suggest that the accuracy of DG6 and FSL2 deteriorates during and immediately after exercise but remains acceptable for both devices during HIIT. However, accuracy is compromised with DG6 during aerobic exercise. This study is the first to compare the accuracy of two CGMs, DG6, and FSL2, during two exercise modalities, using plasma glucose YSI measurements as the gold standard for comparisons. It was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06080542).
本研究旨在评估 Dexcom G6(DG6)和 FreeStyle Libre-2(FSL2)在 1 型糖尿病患者进行有氧运动和高强度间歇训练(HIIT)时的准确性。26 名男性(平均年龄 29.3±6.3 岁,糖尿病病程 14.9±6.1 年)参与了本研究。使用 DG6 和 FSL2 测量间质葡萄糖水平,同时使用 YSI 2500 每 10 分钟测量一次血浆葡萄糖水平,作为本研究中葡萄糖测量的参考。测量从运动开始前 20 分钟开始,持续到运动后 20 分钟。每个受试者和运动进行 7 次测量。与 YSI 葡萄糖数据相比,DG6 和 FSL2 设备在有氧运动和 HIIT 运动中均显示出显著差异。与有氧运动相比,连续血糖监测(CGM)设备在 HIIT 中表现出更好的性能,DG6 的平均绝对相对差异分别为 14.03%和 31.98%。在两种设备的比较中,FSL2 在有氧运动中的有效性明显更高,但在 HIIT 中其性能不如 DG6。根据 40/40 标准,两种传感器的性能相似,所有范围和两种运动的标记均超过 93%,HIIT 和>180mg/dL 范围的标记均超过 99%,这符合 FDA 指南。研究结果表明,DG6 和 FSL2 在运动中和运动后立即的准确性会下降,但两种设备在 HIIT 中仍具有可接受的准确性。然而,在有氧运动中,DG6 的准确性会受到影响。本研究首次使用血浆葡萄糖 YSI 测量作为比较的金标准,比较了两种 CGM 设备,DG6 和 FSL2 在两种运动方式下的准确性。该研究已在 clinicaltrials.gov 注册(NCT06080542)。